krypt0nian
Banned
Chromax said:I thought in one of the modes, you could poke them and they reacts. =(
Profile mode I believe. I played with it at WizardWorld Chicago and it rocks. Perfect showpiece for when friends are over. =D
Chromax said:I thought in one of the modes, you could poke them and they reacts. =(
jiggle said:How is there not a virtual pet game, using this camera, is beyond me :/
Chromax said:I thought in one of the modes, you could poke them and they reacts. =(
That mode is still there right?
TJ Spyke said:Are they gonna do the same crap as real TCG publishers? I used to be into the Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG, but they released a new expansion pack every 3 months and it just got too expensive to keep even a decent deck going. Is Sony (or whoever is doing the TCG part of this) gonna do that too?
Broktune said:This game might make me buy a ps3. One thing worries me though.
Do you think that the game will eventually play too slow? Meaning, do you think that watching the animations, monster spawns, battles, etc. will become tiresome? I think back to games like FF and Advance Wars. After awhile, I just skipped past the summon animations and battle animations in both games respectively. Do you think the same thing could happen here? And if so, is the game good enough to warrant the purchase price?
I'm curious to see how this turns out. I remember playing Magic online. I used to love to look at the artwork of the cards and read the little passages. People would then bitch and moan about you taking too long. I'm so intrigued by the idea of this game.
TTP said:Here it is.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqA3SP7goMc
Yousendit file (better res):
http://download.yousendit.com/1E3E7742588EB27D
vdo said:Wow, TTP, that is the most indepth I have seen of the possibilities of interactivity in the Eye camera so far. I did not expect to see the creature tilt with the card or to be able to be bounced up and down on the card by moving your hand up and down. There seems to be more potential for the Eye as an alternative input device than Sony has shown so far. It will be interesting to see if a lot of game ideas are made using this device - even if they are smaller, downloadable ones, they should be able to think up some pretty fun ways of using this.
TTP said:Ah, sure, but that's not really a game mode. More like a showcase stuff where you can see profiles and play around with the creatures.
Respose is istantaneous when you move you hand over a creature but it's not something that sophisticated really. You just trigger some animations and that's it.
When moving cards around on your hand there is a bit of lag but it's still cool to look at a flaming dragon agitating in your hand.
edit: doing a video of this. will youtube in 10 mins.
TTP said:Here it is.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqA3SP7goMc
Yousendit file (better res):
http://download.yousendit.com/1E3E7742588EB27D
Chromax said:You can turn off the battle animation.
TTP said:Here it is.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqA3SP7goMc
Yousendit file (better res):
http://download.yousendit.com/1E3E7742588EB27D
Broktune said:Yes, but do you think the game would still be worth the price of admission? I'm just afraid I'm going to reach that middle ground of liking the card game but getting tired of the animations. And if that is the case, is it worth it to invest in this game?
Kittonwy said:I don't get what they find wrong with the graphics (7.5), are there games in the same genre that look better than this for them to rate it so average? The self-shadowing is there, the lighting/particle effects (when the dragon appears in the video review in the end it lights up the surrending characters on the other spots as well) and animations are there, it's got a nice style to it, what is missing?
MWS Natural said:A bit harsh on the guy for wondering? I've read a couple of reviews where anyone can tell the reviewer couldn't have fully completed the game or done something they claimed in the review. I see nothing wrong with him being a bit skeptical.
Madman said:You know, that's really rude. So what he questioned the credibility of something said in a review. Far too many times have reviews seemed like someone barely played the game or didn't play at all and just drew impressions from other sites/previews. Your own site has had laughable mistakes as recent as The Last Canyon. So please, don't sit there call names and act as though you are somehow better than someone here. You aren't. Thanks.
Core407 said:Can you play online against people?
krypt0nian said:It's not game breaking at all. They only allow x amt of each card by strength in deck. It would be no different than someone buying/trading to get the cards. WotC is not in the habit of building broken game systems.
keyrat said:how fast is the reaction speed to your fingers probing the monsters and such? do you have the eye create software to go along with this?
TTP said:Sam, is that you at 6th place in the EOJ leaderboard?
SamBishop said:Ah, but were someone to set up a database of scanned in cards allowing someone to essentially build a killer deck for free, it would ruin the balance of the game. Yes, there are checks in place (and it's even more obvious when you play the game and see how they've capped certain really powerful spells so they can only be brought out late in a match), but it still ruins the rarities of the cards and whatnot.
Ninja Scooter said:since when is a 7.5 a bad score for graphics? I swear you people want every game you like or are even interested in to get 10s in everything and then complain that reviewers suck.
TTP said:Indeed, but just to be clear, creature isn't really bouncing there. It's more a consequence of the lag in detecting crature position that makes it look like so. Basically, I was moving the card up and down too fast, so by the time the creature was drawn "up", card was already down. Nevertheless, it's cool it can detect distance/inclination as well as orientation.
Besides, I don't think this game uses the "120fps" mode but just the standard one. I'm really curious to see what they come up with in the future.
ElFly said:Then the game was broken in the first place.
how is this different than what's in other ps3 games like skate?Wollan said:Some new video supposedly showing game invites from Eye of Judgment.
I'm not sure if this guy is mistaking it for a feature that's exclusively within the game itself or if it's actually XMB wide but take a look:
http://www.justin.tv/kotaku/40720/Eye_Of_Judgement_Ingame_Invitation
SamBishop said:It was susceptible to cheating from the start, yeah, but then the only difference between this and, say, someone using counterfeit Magic cards is that most of the battles will be played online with scanned-in cards, so you have no way to call someone on their shiz.
Either way, I'll try to get a definitive "yes, you can absolutely copy things" from Ryan when I see those guys tomorrow. Last I'd heard, it didn't work, but apparently further tests proved that wrong. I'll know for sure tomorrow.
ElFly said:Then the game was broken in the first place.
edit: if a killer deck actually exists, and the only safeguard against it is card rarity, it's not a well designed game.
SamBishop said:It's weird; to me it kinda seems like they did build in some kind of detection for rapid changes in height -- or at least it seemed that way to me. One of the first things I did when the game came in was basically do what you did in that video and just mess around with things. I think I was using some of the more humanoid characters like the twin goblins or the assassin and it seemed like they would actually react to being bounced. Even if it was just placebo, it definitely impressed me with being able to fairly quickly recognize angles and rotation and stuff.
It was susceptible to cheating from the start, yeah, but then the only difference between this and, say, someone using counterfeit Magic cards is that most of the battles will be played online with scanned-in cards, so you have no way to call someone on their shiz.
Either way, I'll try to get a definitive "yes, you can absolutely copy things" from Ryan when I see those guys tomorrow. Last I'd heard, it didn't work, but apparently further tests proved that wrong. I'll know for sure tomorrow.
dfyb said:i'm in the same situation and i just thought of something... if i was a real dick, i could buy it on launch day from a store. then i could return the unopened copy from amazon to the store to get my $69 back... any faults with this plan?