"According to a person involved in the deal who was not allowed to speak publicly because he was not authorized by either company, Facebook eventually plans to redesign the Oculus hardware and rebrand it with a Facebook interface and logo."
looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
link: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/26/t...l-reality-headset.html?hpw&rref=business&_r=0
I couldn't imagine anyone in this position truing down an offer like to, to be honest...
Oculus VR went from a 2.4 million dollar crowd funded company, to a 2 billion dollar buy out...
Honestly though, I think 2 billion is undervalued for this company, they spent more on less. I just hope Facebook can give Oculus VR some breathing room to grow on their own.
uh...what? That's like borderline pedophilia accusations right there.
"According to a person involved in the deal who was not allowed to speak publicly because he was not authorized by either company, Facebook eventually plans to redesign the Oculus hardware and rebrand it with a Facebook interface and logo."
looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
link: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/26/t...l-reality-headset.html?hpw&rref=business&_r=0
2 billion is seriously cheap though, that palmer is dumb
5 billion would've been my minimum
Hahahahaha what? How?
"According to a person involved in the deal who was not allowed to speak publicly because he was not authorized by either company, Facebook eventually plans to redesign the Oculus hardware and rebrand it with a Facebook interface and logo."
looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
link: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/26/t...l-reality-headset.html?hpw&rref=business&_r=0
"According to a person involved in the deal who was not allowed to speak publicly because he was not authorized by either company, Facebook eventually plans to redesign the Oculus hardware and rebrand it with a Facebook interface and logo."
looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
link: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/26/t...l-reality-headset.html?hpw&rref=business&_r=0
Context? Wat does that tweet meanCan't believe Cliff actually tweeted that... Damn...
Can someone explain this?
In 10 years they would have been worth so much more.A consumer version hasn't even entered the market. They've put a ton of time into R&D, and got people interested, but 2 billion is an insane amount of money.
A few semi-random thoughts about the news:
1) The Facebook acquisition will cause the business model behind Oculus VR to change. Facebook is built primarily on an advertising business model, so that will inevitably be a part of future Oculus VR offerings.
2) Facebook will still be interested in games, but will push for more social applications that can be monitized.
3) Sony's Morpheus now becomes the pure gaming oriented VR play. Sony has done well with a "core gamer" focus for PS4 and they will continue that focus for Morpheus. If Sony is smart, they will start blanketing AAA and indie developers alike with Morpheus kits and keep reiterating the "gaming first" mantra.
4) Unless Microsoft has been secretly working on VR for the past few years, they may find themselves behind Sony with no easy way (i.e., buying Oculus VR) to catch up. It will be interesting to see if and how Microsoft responds to both Sony and Facebook.
"According to a person involved in the deal who was not allowed to speak publicly because he was not authorized by either company, Facebook eventually plans to redesign the Oculus hardware and rebrand it with a Facebook interface and logo."
link: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/26/t...l-reality-headset.html?hpw&rref=business&_r=0
![]()
holy shit
"Brendan Iribe, a co-founder and the chief executive of Oculus VR, said Facebook would be able to use the technology to allow avatars representing its members to interact with one another perhaps by socializing at online parties."
And I'm out.
That's mighty high of someone, who's sitting on about as much knowledge as I am. Zero.
We are all speculating here. You think VR won't be big enough to be a new mainstay media form. Obviously, other people do. That includes individuals, and entire corporations. We're all hedging our bets, here. If this thing takes off like Facebook wants it to, and Sony sticks with "lucrative" software sales, revisionist history will look back at them as fools for missing out on something much much bigger. The opposite is also true.
Also, marketing to the PC audience doesn't stop them from selling that same exclusive software. Stopping dualshocks from being sold as standard PC controllers doesn't really benefit anyone.
"According to a person involved in the deal who was not allowed to speak publicly because he was not authorized by either company, Facebook eventually plans to redesign the Oculus hardware and rebrand it with a Facebook interface and logo."
looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
link: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/26/t...l-reality-headset.html?hpw&rref=business&_r=0
Ummm... what's rolling on Molly? Google search is linking to sites I don't want to go to. >_>
I saw it just a few minutes ago.Did he delete the tweet?
Did he delete the tweet?
Can't believe Cliff actually tweeted that... Damn...
Ummm... what's rolling on Molly? Google search is linking to sites I don't want to go to. >_>
Ummm... what's rolling on Molly? Google search is linking to sites I don't want to go to. >_>
"According to a person involved in the deal who was not allowed to speak publicly because he was not authorized by either company, Facebook eventually plans to redesign the Oculus hardware and rebrand it with a Facebook interface and logo."
looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
link: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/26/t...l-reality-headset.html?hpw&rref=business&_r=0
Buh... Who else will defend multi-billion dollar companies? The poor things just want to help the future of VR.and those who haven't left it... defend it.... have you guys noticed that?
Like this tweet of Cliffy's. Yep, it will.things come back to haunt you
Ummm... what's rolling on Molly? Google search is linking to sites I don't want to go to. >_>
Did cliffy b just accuse notch of running a rave party for underage teens on drugs?
In 10 years they would have been worth so much more.
This image would be awesome as a gif with Notch morphing into Zuck.
Carmack pulled himself out of the shit, now he's getting pulled back in.
Ummm... what's rolling on Molly? Google search is linking to sites I don't want to go to. >_>
I'm imagining a Facebook / Playstation Home hybrid, which people abandon their real live to participate in. Endless VR "walls" of nonsensical selfies and pats on ones own back. Shoveling cheese puffs into your gullet as you bleed away hours in a VR world built around marketing, commerce, and data collection instead of purely game development. Now, instead of just seeing your "friends" pictures of their newly born child, you can actually see it birthed in this new digital realm, all the while participating in a VR rave chaulk full of virtual MDMA which you can literally buy with real money."Brendan Iribe, a co-founder and the chief executive of Oculus VR, said Facebook would be able to use the technology to allow avatars representing its members to interact with one another — perhaps by socializing at online parties."
And I'm out.
Undervalued how? The product us great but there were literally hundreds of obstacles between them making this a viable product which is embraced by developers which could sustain a real business model outside of donations. They got far more than the value of their company because they had nothing to show that this was a 2 billion dollar company outside of excitement by techy nerds like us.
I see this being the first step in the leap to being able to punch people over the Internet. if so, those girls making duckfaces will be in trouble...Man, Bitstrips in VR!? COUNT ME IN, I can't wait to make millions of fucking comics that take no effort for goddamn amateurs to make!
How about dem selfies? Can't wait to see a girls duck lips one inch away from my face!
Man, if this isn't a 2 billion dollar idea, I don't know what is!