It's like you live in an alternate universe with Sony didn't make the Vita OS. The Vita OS curb stomps the shit out if the 360's and PS3.
I guess I do. Vita? Seriously?
It's like you live in an alternate universe with Sony didn't make the Vita OS. The Vita OS curb stomps the shit out if the 360's and PS3.
If MS was able to do more using less memory, they probably had better OS coders.
So now it is 6GB for games? Is this a legit number or just an assumption?
Edit : nvm
I guess I do. Vita? Seriously?
6GB is sweet.
S¡mon;73210371 said:Show me a 10-line program which eats up 8 GB of RAM, please.
Are you sure you got pissed and blamed Sony?Actually I am pissed Sony are charging for online. However I have no choice, I don't want to game on PC and both nextgen consoles charge for online play, so I have to go for the cheaper option, PSN+ is cheaper than Gold and of course the system is cheaper than Xbox One. I blame Sony for charging for online, but I also blame the people who payed for Gold too.
As a PSN+ subscriber this doesn't affect me, but I can see why people would be pissed (note PSN+ is awesome so dont worry). I am glad Sony didn't go all out by blocking Netflix and etc.
What was that?
I guess I do. Vita? Seriously?
What you quoted doesn't seem to disagree with what he said. He can be pissed about it and have it still not affect him.Are you sure you got pissed and blamed Sony?
I'm going to go with:
- 5.5 dedicated (Game)
- 0.5 flex (Game)
- 1.5 dedicated OS
- 0.5 (reserved - can be freed later on)
3months from release. Would love to see it in action not just concept videos.Yes, seriously. I kind of want to see people attacking that OS's performance, features, responsiveness, and usability (even though there is a non trivial portion of subjectivity there) or at least try to do so.
Same for the actual CPU, RAM setup, and GPU used.
5 GB of GDDR is sufficient for the kind of CPU-GPU the console has.
It's still a better RAM than the one found in the X-One, paired with a more powerful GPU (The message is aimed at the insecure Sony fans!).
Back when the console was thought to have only 4 GB of RAM, it was still deemed the more adept graphical system of the two. Now Sony just matched MS in terms of quantity...
Are you sure you got pissed and blamed Sony?
Wouldn't you like 6 though? 6 is such a nice round, even number... It has a nice ring to it too, and requires only three letters to spell : SIX .
Wouldn't you like 6 though? 6 is such a nice round, even number... It has a nice ring to it too, and requires only three letters to spell : SIX .
I just got this feeling,
this feeling in my feathers,
that only a Dr. Bird would get,
That it's 6 GB .
justmyopinion mang.
People didn't even care if devs were happy with the rumored 5 GB. They just wanted PS4 to have a bigger number than Xbox One. It's why you are seeing so many people happy with 6GB.
People didn't even care if devs were happy with the rumored 5 GB. They just wanted PS4 to have a bigger number than Xbox One. It's why you are seeing so many people happy with 6GB.
Are you sure you got pissed and blamed Sony?
How about 1 line?
auto p = new char[(2^30)*8];
It is such a nice number too. Enough for the OS, and just enough for games.
People didn't even care if devs were happy with the rumored 5 GB. They just wanted PS4 to have a bigger number than Xbox One. It's why you are seeing so many people happy with 6GB.
Ah thuway dropping the number. None of my guys let me say anything.
Gotta love thuway. Thanks, man! Now I can go about enjoying my weekend.
People didn't even care if devs were happy with the rumored 5 GB. They just wanted PS4 to have a bigger number than Xbox One. It's why you are seeing so many people happy with 6GB.
He made it very clear its just his opinion. Nothin confirmed or from his inside sources.
I guess I do. Vita? Seriously?
Ah thuway dropping the number. None of my guys let me say anything.
lol so truePeople didn't even care if devs were happy with the rumored 5 GB. They just wanted PS4 to have a bigger number than Xbox One. It's why you are seeing so many people happy with 6GB.
People didn't even care if devs were happy with the rumored 5 GB. They just wanted PS4 to have a bigger number than Xbox One. It's why you are seeing so many people happy with 6GB.
Right on the money.
pfft i bet that wouldn't even compile bro
People didn't even care if devs were happy with the rumored 5 GB. They just wanted PS4 to have a bigger number than Xbox One. It's why you are seeing so many people happy with 6GB.
He made it very clear its just his opinion. Nothin confirmed or from his inside sources.
People didn't even care if devs were happy with the rumored 5 GB. They just wanted PS4 to have a bigger number than Xbox One. It's why you are seeing so many people happy with 6GB.
People didn't even care if devs were happy with the rumored 5 GB. They just wanted PS4 to have a bigger number than Xbox One. It's why you are seeing so many people happy with 6GB.
Yeah I was. But I was assuming that Microsoft was going to have full backwards compatibility.
Ah thuway dropping the number. None of my guys let me say anything.
That's still 3 freaking GB out of the 8 reserved for the OS or whatever, the hell?
A bit overkill on the reservation, I mean like damn what are they going to need all that memory for?
I think Bruce just corroborated the number.He made it very clear its just his opinion. Nothin confirmed or from his inside sources.