If he attacked her he deserves to be in the hospital.
Do you know what happened? There says that she hit him with the pistol, that's why he was in the hospital... So I think that she attacked him.
If he attacked her he deserves to be in the hospital.
The firearm laws in the US are just wrong.
I'll believe the actual reports. She pistol whipped him. She's the culprit here.
Disgusting shoot first ask questions later mentality.
I am not talking about the struggle earlier that day, but the killing of her daughter. She shot her trough the door, after hearing her knock, if I understood that right. There shouldn't be a tool in a normal household that can kill or even hurt people that effectively through doors - except firearms that is.Not that I disagree, but again - whether it was her who was violet or the BF who was - if she wanted to protect herself (or kill someone), she could have done it with any kind of 'weapon'.
"As she opened the door a shot was fired, hitting her daughter in the upper chest. The 4 month-old was not injured," said police.
I stand corrected. She didn't shoot trough the door, she opened it.Wow she didn't even look to see who was at the door?
Now it sounds just weird. So she looked at her daughter before pulling the trigger. Isn't that nice."As she opened the door a shot was fired, hitting her daughter in the upper chest. The 4 month-old was not injured," said police.
During a fight. Did he start the fight? The article doesn't make that clear. If he did, he had it coming.
You can't victim blame if you apply that sort of bullet proof logic.It's not said, and I'm not the one to believe her testimony. I rather believe what actually happened. The man was put into the hospital after being pistol whipped by her. I'm not giving him benefit of a doubt, but until there are actual reported cases of him being physically violent, I'll side with evidence.
Right valnen? Their fight will make her shooting a woman holding a baby make more sense...?
This reminds me of a friend of mine. he was coming to a friend's apartment so he could mooch off the internet. he goes to the wrong door and starts knocking. after getting no response, he starts banging and yelling stuff like "let me in; I want my internet"!You'd be shocked at how many police calls consist of people scared shitless at people knocking on their door.
Some guy who did that in Florida a while ago, got murdered by 2 police, no questions asked. I think it was even the wrong address. Cases of mistaken identity are fatal down there it seems. I'll try to find the story.I guess it's asking too much for murderers to spend .5 seconds to ensure they are murdering the correct target.
I don't recall saying this. I'm just saying that trying to make her out to be some sort of aggressor may not be right.
Castle doctrine varies greatly from state to state and correct me if I'm wrong but does it cover shooting someone NOT inside your house? I don't know Florida law well enough except to know what SYG is fine in theory but horribly utilized in reality.
You're kinda rambling so it's making it difficult for me to respond (not to mention the fact that I'm on a ton of meds after surgery lol weeeee!)
Or you know... She could just not shoot someone unless she had no alternative.
Just as an aside: Just about all laws we have governing behavior is on the "honor" system. With your freedom we trust you not to steal, not to murder, not to rape, not to maim, not to drive drunk, etc. until a law is violated a person has their rights. It is what it is.
(Forgive me if I'm the one rambling now...)
Ugly people shouldn't be allowed to own guns
"Right" as in correct. If he attacked her and made her in fear for her life she's clearly not an aggressor."Right"in what way though?
Of course it does, and for that she's been rightfully arrested.I understand the concern, I guess, but the dead daughter holding the grandchild is enough to need to be reprimanded for.
Not if he attacked her first.Wait, shouldnt she have been arrested for pistol whipping her boyfriend?