See? Sometimes you can judge a person by their looks alone.
Because Jared Fogle has always just plain old LOOKED like friggin' pedophile. No surprise that he turns out to actually be one.
are there like common traits for pedophiles? lol
See? Sometimes you can judge a person by their looks alone.
Because Jared Fogle has always just plain old LOOKED like friggin' pedophile. No surprise that he turns out to actually be one.
Honestly. Will people look down on me for going yo subway? They make a quick cheap meal. Ive been dieting and when I dont have food I go there.
Im.. im not the monster.. its jared.
Man, if there's a boycott ill be forced to make my own tuna sandwitches. Ugh.
Wasn't his manager busted first for child porn? I'm curious if like he specifically hired a pedophile as his manager, or one of them introduced the other to it, or it was just random coincidence they both shared the same hobby.
Wasn't his manager busted first for child porn? I'm curious if like he specifically hired a pedophile as his manager, or one of them introduced the other to it, or it was just random coincidence they both shared the same hobby.
Honestly. Will people look down on me for going yo subway? They make a quick cheap meal. Ive been dieting and when I dont have food I go there.
Im.. im not the monster.. its jared.
Man, if there's a boycott ill be forced to make my own tuna sandwitches. Ugh.
Honestly. Will people look down on me for going yo subway? They make a quick cheap meal. Ive been dieting and when I dont have food I go there.
Im.. im not the monster.. its jared.
Man, if there's a boycott ill be forced to make my own tuna sandwitches.
Eat fresh gone wrong.
They ordered it as a treat at work. It was late.. that sauce and tenderness though....Man I go to Chick-fil-a still. I ain't shit either.
Yes, if you go to Subway after this news then you are clearly a pedophile.
Honestly. Will people look down on me for going yo subway? They make a quick cheap meal. Ive been dieting and when I dont have food I go there.
Im.. im not the monster.. its jared.
Man, if there's a boycott ill be forced to make my own tuna sandwitches. Ugh.
Honestly. Will people look down on me for going yo subway? They make a quick cheap meal. Ive been dieting and when I dont have food I go there.
Im.. im not the monster.. its jared.
Man, if there's a boycott ill be forced to make my own tuna sandwitches. Ugh.
Plea deal better end with his ass in prison. Weren't people arguing that he was only dating 16 year old girls and that there was nothing wrong with it because it's "legal".
GAF will.
You will be a weak minded pedophile because you eat at subway just as I am a weak minded anti LGBT rights bigot because I eat at chick-fil-a.
GAF will.
You will be a weak minded pedophile because you eat at subway just as I am a weak minded anti LGBT rights bigot because I eat at chick-fil-a.
Man, people who eat at Chick Fil A are REALLY defensive.
Man, people who eat at Chick Fil A are REALLY defensive.
Honestly. Will people look down on me for going yo subway? They make a quick cheap meal. Ive been dieting and when I dont have food I go there.
Im.. im not the monster.. its jared.
Man, if there's a boycott ill be forced to make my own tuna sandwitches. Ugh.
If Subway knew about this aspect of him, or helped him cover it up, that would be one thing.They hired him in the first place. Why would you frequent a place who hired a pedophile as a spokesperson, or at all for that matter?
Damn, sad it turned out this way. Don't feel bad for him, but it's always shitty when a "good" person turns out to be a creep.
3) WHY DOESN'T JIMMY JOHNS HAVE A GODDAMN MEATBALL SUB?
So you bring it in to other threads?It's just so easy to make a joke with it when every thread involving that place devolves into the same thing every time lol.
Why not have fun with it?
Edit: nope, not continuing. I made my crappy joke already.
If Subway knew about this aspect of him, or helped him cover it up, that would be one thing.
But I think Subway is just as surprised as the rest of us, and management from top to bottom is going "oh shit oh shit oh shit" right now, trying to distance themselves as far as possible from him.
He's always struck me as creepy.
Is this equivalent to if you go to Chik-Fil-A, you hate gay people and don't believe in civil rights for everyone?
1) Did Subway know about this beforehand?
2) What other sub place will make me a Meatball sub with pepperoni and bacon on it?
3) WHY DOESN'T JIMMY JOHNS HAVE A GODDAMN MEATBALL SUB?
Yes. Many people will genuinely do this. Some people find it impossible to separate the actions of an employer and an employee.An employee of theirs got busted for something he did in his free time. I mean, come on. Are people seriously going to stop eating at Subway because they didn't monitor Jared 24/7 to know that he was into some fucked up shit?
I'd understand a boycott if it was the owner, but an employee? What?
Subway was notified some time ago, long before this incident that Jared was doing the craigslist thing with little girls. A female franchisee owner says she reported him to Subway corporate but they didn't do anything about it. Subway denies that they ever received a report about it.
3) WHY DOESN'T JIMMY JOHNS HAVE A GODDAMN MEATBALL SUB?
They ordered it as a treat at work. It was late.. that sauce and tenderness though....
hate ate it.
Didn't Subway cut ties with Jared, like...a while ago?
Quiznoe's was better anyways
LOL wtf at ppl boycotting subway. What immense stupidity, how does this relate to them in any way at all?!
So you bring it in to other threads?
"Every time CFA is mentioned the thread turns to crap so I'ma make a joke about how much I love it for reasons!"
Well done, I guess?
The Subway backlash in this thread is weird as fuck.
You really think they conspired to keep his pedo-ways under wraps for fear of brand damage? Jared hasn't been central to their advertising for years now.
Corporations do some genuinely shitty things, but this is a rather large leap in logic, barring some corroboration coming from...anywhere, anything, anyone.
The FBI has subpoenaed text messages from former Subway spokesman Jared Fogle in which he allegedly admits having paid $100 for sex with a 16-year-old girl.
Business Insider reports Fogle had been messaging a woman—who formerly worked as a Subway franchisee—with whom he was having a sexual relationship. In the messages, sent in 2008, Fogle allegedly asked the woman to advertise herself on Craigslist where she would offer sex with other men while Fogle watched.
This exchange led the woman to ask Fogle, "Is this the same website you found that 16-year-old girl that you f**ked...I still can't believe you only paid $100 for her." Fogle is said to have responded, "It was amazing," according to the report.
"This allegation, if true, is appalling and is contrary to the values of our brand," said a Subway brand spokeswoman. "As previously stated, we have suspended our relationship with Jared."
Business Insider spoke with the former franchisee's lawyer; both the lawyer and the franchisee asked to remain anonymous. The woman's relationship with Fogle allegedly took place between January and June 2008.
Although the age of consent is 16 in Indiana, where Fogle lives, the FBI has subpoenaed the messages as part of an ongoing investigation, the woman's lawyer tells Business Insider. It was unclear if the messages were being sought by authorities because they could be evidence of prostitution or because of Fogle's other alleged sexual references to minors. FBI officials would neither confirm nor deny that they were requesting the messages.
The woman brought the text messages to Subway after she became uncomfortable with her relationship with Fogle, but the brand did nothing with the information, Business Insider reports.
"We have no record that this alleged complaint was ever brought to our attention," said the Subway spokeswoman. "Had it been, we would have immediately taken action."
The woman is said to have met Fogle at a Subway function and then began a six-month relationship with him. When she began feeling uncomfortable in the relationship—he also allegedly asked to meet with her under-age cousin—the woman hired a lawyer to see if she had violated her franchisee contract.
The woman requested that all marketing materials or mentions of Fogle be removed from her store location. She is also said to have told Subway upper management that Fogle should "not be interacting with young people."
Mind you, I'm not saying I agree or disagree with a boycott. However, I vehemently disagree that doing so would be immensely stupid. One, Subway benefited tremendously off of this guy's image as an everyman who lost weight eating their food. It's not shocking at all that -- given their investment in his image for so long -- something like this could hurt them. You can't just distance yourself overnight from someone that was so tied to your franchise's image for so long.
The other aspect of this is that if this person is so integral to your business's image, some hold the franchise accountable for proper vetting. People expect oversight. Maybe they honestly didn't know, and that's arguably fine. But perhaps they should have? Maybe they should have been more aware of the person they were cutting big checks to to prop up their company.
Now, I want to clarify that I'm not arguing for a boycott or suggesting anyone is a bad person for continuing to eat there. I'm just stating that I understand where people are coming from.
Mind you, I'm not saying I agree or disagree with a boycott. However, I vehemently disagree that doing so would be immensely stupid. One, Subway benefited tremendously off of this guy's image as an everyman who lost weight eating their food. It's not shocking at all that -- given their investment in his image for so long -- something like this could hurt them. You can't just distance yourself overnight from someone that was so tied to your franchise's image for so long.
The other aspect of this is that if this person is so integral to your business's image, some hold the franchise accountable for proper vetting. People expect oversight. Maybe they honestly didn't know, and that's arguably fine. But perhaps they should have? Maybe they should have been more aware of the person they were cutting big checks to to prop up their company.
Now, I want to clarify that I'm not arguing for a boycott or suggesting anyone is a bad person for continuing to eat there. I'm just stating that I understand where people are coming from.
Mind you, I'm not saying I agree or disagree with a boycott. However, I vehemently disagree that doing so would be immensely stupid. One, Subway benefited tremendously off of this guy's image as an everyman who lost weight eating their food. It's not shocking at all that -- given their investment in his image for so long -- something like this could hurt them. You can't just distance yourself overnight from someone that was so tied to your franchise's image for so long.
The other aspect of this is that if this person is so integral to your business's image, some hold the franchise accountable for proper vetting. People expect oversight. Maybe they honestly didn't know, and that's arguably fine. But perhaps they should have? Maybe they should have been more aware of the person they were cutting big checks to to prop up their company.
Now, I want to clarify that I'm not arguing for a boycott or suggesting anyone is a bad person for continuing to eat there. I'm just stating that I understand where people are coming from.
I wonder how these people feel about Nintendo hiring multiple rapists for sponsorship.
Did the phrase "Eat Fresh" predate the Jared campaign, or was it created during, and then tied-in, to that campaign?
I legitimately cannot for the life of me think of any Nintendo sponsors like this.
I legitimately cannot for the life of me think of any Nintendo sponsors like this.
I wonder how these people feel about Nintendo hiring multiple rapists for sponsorship.