A perfectly bad style choice.As many people have said, that's a perfectly valid style choice.
Let's fight.
Edit: way to start off the page with an important, topical and not at all irrelevant post.
A perfectly bad style choice.As many people have said, that's a perfectly valid style choice.
I... um... maybe? I used to do it but I'm sure I picked up from somewhere that it wasn't the right thing to do. So I've probably screwed up somewhere. I know for sure I haven't used it myself for years and when I accidentally do, it just looks wrong. That's not to say it is, though.Are you shitting on the Oxford comma?
Because I will fight you.
Me... until now, I guess.What native English user doesn't do this?
Maybe it's just a thing where you either use it or you don't, like aluminum or aluminium. (Side note: Guess which one of those Firefox decided to highlight as a spelling error. Yup.)I had to go double check, I'm apparently an ardent proponent of the serial comma, and furthermore
But seriously, I've been writing published stuff for over ten years and my manuscripts are littered with it. I'm either a terrible writer or my editors are all terrible :O
Right after that, they start talking about ethics...
The only reason I don't like it is because it just looks weird, and out of place. Like aluminum, mom and the board game "Clue" (it's "Cluedo", damnit).*Sorry to drag this out any more, but... I can't remember when I started using the Oxford/serial comma, but I didn't even know it was a named thing when I did. Writing something like "I went to the store and bought bacon, lettuce, and tomatoes" without that comma before the last "and blank" would seem weird to me. It creates the right pause between each item, and ensures the last two aren't lumped together.
Why do people hate it so much? I read the pros and cons on the Wikipedia article, but none of the cons seem to outweigh the pros.
I... um... maybe? I used to do it but I'm sure I picked up from somewhere that it wasn't the right thing to do. So I've probably screwed up somewhere. I know for sure I haven't used it myself for years and when I accidentally do, it just looks wrong. That's not to say it is, though.
Me... until now, I guess.
Maybe it's just a thing where you either use it or you don't, like aluminum or aluminium. (Side note: Guess which one of those Firefox decided to highlight as a spelling error. Yup.)
Just check if their site has huge Halo 4 ads.I'd have no problem with a letter like that IF they did not force you to force a review score, that is just tipping the scales way too much.
Being funded by Microsoft helped Polygon to be really impartial and ethic with their reviews.Right after that, they start talking about ethics...
From the gamesindustry.biz article linked before:
I wish I could turn this into some kind of stamp and go around branding it on people's foreheads whenever they're playing the "Not worthy of discussion" card.
Just a couple of months ago a fact became known. A one precent difference in Fallout:New Vegas' Metacritic score caused Obsidian to miss out on millions of dollars of bonuses. Millions of dollars. In a single game. For a single developer. And they have the BALLS to claim they don't matter enough to warrant scrutiny.
Fuck you.
The artile is great but how is what you're describing not mainly the fault of the publisher, and maybe even Obsidian for agreeing on those terms?
The artile is great but how is what you're describing not mainly the fault of the publisher, and maybe even Obsidian for agreeing on those terms?
Sorry to jump on this, since your question is fair, but here's how it really works...
Obsidian very likely had 2 options: no potential for bonuses, or bonuses based on metacritic. When provided those two options, which would you take?
Game dev contract negotiation is a brutal tug of war meets battle of attrition meets david vs goliath. It's insanely hard to sign good deals. It's almost impossible to sign great ones.
So, while Obsidian did sign the contract with these terms, stating it's 'their fault' is inaccurate.
The flags dammit, the goddam flags!! Someone send a new vegas flag to the kotaku video editor this instant!Would they have got that extra 1% if the PR team were extra schmoozy? Were there enough New Vegas bottles of Champagne sent to Joystiq? Who does the fault lie with?
Writing something like "I went to the store and bought bacon, lettuce, and tomatoes"
I don't know that anyone who isn't a suit-wearing, monocle-shining high-level executive believes that Metacritic bonuses are actually a good idea. I've written about this before: http://www.kotaku.com.au/2012/03/why-are-game-developer-bonuses-based-on-review-scores/
That sentence is ethically wrong.
That sentence is ethically wrong.
I see a comma in lists as a stand-in for either "or" or "and". Thus having both the "or"/"and" and the comma repeats the same piece of information twice. It's a syntax error.Why do people hate it so much?
I see a comma in lists as a stand-in for either "or" or "and". Thus having both the "or"/"and" and the comma repeats the same piece of information twice. It's a syntax error.
This is potentially amusing and relevant to see the guerilla fightback spreading. The 2012 TIGA Awards were held in Bath, UK last night and this flyer made an appearance on behalf of one of the entrants:
I was taught to it this way in school. No foul here on that matter.There's hyperbole, and there's hyperbole:
(let's ignore the fact that a "journalist" has committed one of the cardinal sins of the written English word... using a comma toward the end of a list, prior to using an "and")
I was taught to it this way in school. No foul here on that matter.
You're not a native English speaker, are you?I see a comma in lists as a stand-in for either "or" or "and". Thus having both the "or"/"and" and the comma repeats the same piece of information twice. It's a syntax error.
For those just joining us, we are discussing commas during the break between gaming media ethical failures.
Should be about 10 minutes.
We're discussing journalism. And some of the syntax these writers use is pretty horrible. Look at GB reviews and their love of conjunctions as sentence starters.
I don't know that anyone who isn't a suit-wearing, monocle-shining high-level executive believes that Metacritic bonuses are actually a good idea. I've written about this before: http://www.kotaku.com.au/2012/03/why-are-game-developer-bonuses-based-on-review-scores/
It would all be pure hypothetical, so I can't say. Again, my point was that the poster I was responding to claimed that, perhaps, some of the fault is the devs for taking the deal.Would they have got that extra 1% if the PR team were extra schmoozy? Were there enough New Vegas bottles of Champagne sent to Joystiq? Who does the fault lie with?
ar you going to propose to Jeff in this thread..?
I'm impressed something was held in Bath for once! I know you're not a Future employee yourself, but were they involved in the organisation of it at all? I've lived in Bath myself and I've got friends in Future, but it seems like all the cool events take place in London (Golden Joysticks etc).. what venue did they use?
Regarding the current debate, I teach on a University English Language course (amongst others), and the Oxford comma is indeed what we recommend students use.
I believe in the "Elements of Style" it says comma (before "and") for long lists and no comma (before "and") for short lists of 3 or 4. Not sure though.
What?
Agreed - my only point was that given NO BONUS or METACRITIC BONUS as the two options on the table, everyone will take the metacritic bonus. People shouldn't blame devs for taking that deal when it's (quite likely) the only carrot a publisher is dangling.
just kidding.. lol.. friday you know..!
I believe in the "Elements of Style" it says comma (before "and") for long lists and no comma (before "and") for short lists of 3 or 4. Not sure though.
Does believing in God necessarily implies one is sure of His existence?You're not sure of what you believe in?
???
Why would the length of the list make a difference? Either do one or the other.
2. In a series of three or more terms with a single conjunction, use a comma after each term except the last.
You're not sure of what you believe in?
Does believing in God necessarily implies one is sure of His existence?
Then can there be Faith?If one believes in the existence of God, then yes.
Examples?The sad thing is that Metacritic-based bonuses are low on the 'offensive and terrible things in game contracts' scale... Sigh. Siiiiigh.
Oh, absolutely. And from what I've heard, Obsidian didn't have much choice in the matter. I don't think they can be blamed for signing the contract that was available to them. It's on Bethesda (and other publishers) not to use such a ridiculous metric to measure ANYTHING.
Then can there be Faith?
But if I know god exists, I have no Faith, I have knowledge.It can if one is sure of something.