It seems clear to me that the ESRB prioritizes things like sexuality and nudity as being worse than violence. This is weird to me since nudity is just the human body, something that (hopefully) everyone will see and experience, while, knifing someone in the chest is far less common and something that I hope almost no one has to experience ever.
I'm not much of an authority, but I think the "sexuality/nudity is worse than violence" is sort of an American thing. It has less to do with us being prudes (we're not) but I think in general it's probably just that some religious institutions would have enormous fits over sexual content, and also the culture in general glorifies violence while damning sexuality. It's one thing to fill minds with violence (guns are the defense of the freedom fighters, violence indicates strength and coolness, and so on) and another to seduce with images of the human body (sex is sin, skimpily dressed show-offs are sluts, etc). So the ESRB would consider something that shows boobs more harmful to children than something that shows people killing other people.
Of course, the system and the board that determines the rating is probably a bit more complicated and nuanced than that, but I think culture and "the times" has an influence on the kind of rating a game gets.
I believe it's not unheard of for the ESRB to give a higher rating, if requested by the publisher. Combined with the variance in perspectives of the humans reviewing the content, you can explain most of the ratings weirdness.
I'm still kind of amazed any version of Crusader: No Remorse got a T rating, though. I justified playing so many violent games to my parents as a kid with "Well, it's not as violent as Crusader!"
It's the part where Athena was a little girl & her mom got injured, so she took her over & placed her on a robot repair machine because she figured it would "fix mom up like with the robots". You don't see it happen, but it's heavily implied, especially with a picture of young Athena having a creepy smile, her eyes devoid of pupils, & blood on her face.
Guess it's the whole "violence = ok, sex/nudity = OH NOES" mentality of the US. Weird how DoA2 on PS2 & Dreamcast was T, but the Ultimate version on Xbox was rated M (I think because of ONE implied rape scene in the intro or something), then DoA3 was T, but then DoA4 & 5 were M, but then Dimensions on 3DS was T again. Guess it's the costumes, graphics quality, some of the cutscenes, or something.
I'm not much of an authority, but I think the "sexuality/nudity is worse than violence" is sort of an American thing. It has less to do with us being prudes (we're not) but I think in general it's probably just that some religious institutions would have enormous fits over sexual content, and also the culture in general glorifies violence while damning sexuality. It's one thing to fill minds with violence (guns are the defense of the freedom fighters, violence indicates strength and coolness, and so on) and another to seduce with images of the human body (sex is sin, skimpily dressed show-offs are sluts, etc). So the ESRB would consider something that shows boobs more harmful to children than something that shows people killing other people.
Of course, the system and the board that determines the rating is probably a bit more complicated and nuanced than that, but I think culture and "the times" has an influence on the kind of rating a game gets.
As I noted on the previous page, the ESRB (at least used to) go to the public to help in deciding game ratings... and sex tends to be viewed harsher than violence in the general public's eyes.
The MPAA at least actually watch the entire movie before making their ratings. ESRB watches a portion of the game that the publisher/developer submits, they don't usually play the game and likely won't get proper context for many of the scenes submitted.
It was on the cusp of going higher. Sakurai had to specifically keep Snake's weapons as explosives and not bullets (this is a distinction the ESRB makes, apparently) to keep the game from going to M.
I haven't played all of Origins, but I didn't find anything in Asylum or City that was worthy of a M rating. What makes you think that they should have been rated Mature?
Also, not all other, violent 3rd person action games get rated M? Both Uncharted and inFamous fit that description and are rated T just like Batman.
I don't necessarily want an M rating, but rather consistency. I guess I just don't see the differenct between the Arkham games, and say Crackdown, Assassin's Creed, etc.
The MPAA at least actually watch the entire movie before making their ratings. ESRB watches a portion of the game that the publisher/developer submits, they don't usually play the game and likely won't get proper context for many of the scenes submitted.
But, as far as I understand it, the ESRB is much more transparent and upfront about things, compared to the MPAA. It's been a year or so since I last watched "This Film is Not Yet Rated", but if the MPAA is close to what's portrayed in that film, then the ESRB is better in some ways.
Dark Souls II being rated T for Teen....if Dark Souls & Demon's Souls are rated M, why not Dark Souls II?
What stinks about the ESRB is none of the major retailers will stock games with AO ratings even though having an AAA release with that rating would change the perception of gaming and not just be for children/young adults. I guess the ESRB and the retailers are worried about parent groups being upset more than expanding their audience.
I don't necessarily want an M rating, but rather consistency. I guess I just don't see the differenct between the Arkham games, and say Crackdown, Assassin's Creed, etc.
In Crackdown and AC you kill people and there's way more blood. The main goal in those games is killing. Batman doesn't kill. You could say the combat is more brutal, but the no-death clause makes it more acceptable in the ESRB's eyes.
It was on the cusp of going higher. Sakurai had to specifically keep Snake's weapons as explosives and not bullets (this is a distinction the ESRB makes, apparently) to keep the game from going to M.
Dark Souls II being rated T for Teen....if Dark Souls & Demon's Souls are rated M, why not Dark Souls II?
What stinks about the ESRB is none of the major retailers will stock games with AO ratings even though having an AAA release with that rating would change the perception of gaming and not just be for children/young adults. I guess the ESRB and the retailers are worried about parent groups being upset more than expanding their audience.
I believe there was no need for Dark Souls II to be rated Mature as there was no Quelaag type boss or anything like that?
There is that Scorpion lady but I don't think you can see her breasts.
Also less blood explosions on backstabs and parries.
About games being AO, I never understood the stigma for that rating. The precipice on which it stands just gets pushed further and further back as M gets more and more broad. There are plenty of unrated VN's or indie games that would definitely get an AO because of blatant sex scenes, though.
I assume because they want to be careful of what their kids play or don't want to play the game with kids around. I never play M-rated games when my younger 12-year-old sister is around or awake. Plus my parents were actually aware of the rating system when I was growing up & I barely played any M-rated games until I was in high school, & even then, they would question some T-rated games. Wasn't until I was about 16 or so when they felt I was mature enough to play mature games.
It's the part where Athena was a little girl & her mom got injured, so she took her over & placed her on a robot repair machine because she figured it would "fix mom up like with the robots". You don't see it happen, but it's heavily implied, especially with a picture of young Athena having a creepy smile, her eyes devoid of pupils, & blood on her face.
ooooohhhh, yes, I agree. That was pretty dark. I don't know if it deserves an M rating for it, though, it's hardly in line with what they usually give that rating for.
What I've learned from this thread already though is that the whole thing is subjective. We can break it down all we want but it always comes down to whatever the people who distribute these ratings decide on a case by case basis.
Anyway, Halo is most likely M solely because of the flood. There's some pretty heavy dismemberment there, all with it's own green goo. Also, in Halo 1, you can continuously melee enemies after they've been killed. After a while you'll be in a pool of blood that's almost comically large.
What I mean is that publishers may at times pay to have the rating changed since it has been rumored that Warner Brothers fights hard to keep the Arkham games in the T rating no matter how violent and brutal the games are. Similarly, Microsoft may have a desire for Halo to be considered a Mature game since they know kids are drawn to whatever their parents may feel is inappropriate
It's also interesting that they sometimes change a games rating after it's already released. I'm pretty sure the standard edition of the original Soul Reaver in North America was rated T, but the greatest hits version is rated M.
It's the part where Athena was a little girl & her mom got injured, so she took her over & placed her on a robot repair machine because she figured it would "fix mom up like with the robots". You don't see it happen, but it's heavily implied, especially with a picture of young Athena having a creepy smile, her eyes devoid of pupils, & blood on her face.
Not the first time a Capcom game got rated M just for exactly one endgame scene either. Bionic Commando Rearmed is pretty tame overall; it got a M only because of the infamous exploding Hitler head. GRIN stated they could have removed it to bring the rating down but didn't want to upset the BC fans.
It's also interesting that they sometimes change a games rating after it's already released. I'm pretty sure the standard edition of the original Soul Reaver in North America was rated T, but the greatest hits version is rated M.
ooooohhhh, yes, I agree. That was pretty dark. I don't know if it deserves an M rating for it, though, it's hardly in line with what they usually give that rating for.
What I've learned from this thread already though is that the whole thing is subjective. We can break it down all we want but it always comes down to whatever the people who distribute these ratings decide on a case by case basis.
In AA5's case, I think a lot of it has to do with not what's portrayed directly, but where and how it's being portrayed.
Explosions are generally considered weapons of "terror" and that automatically bumps it up, but coupled with the fact that the primary bombing in the game takes place in a courtroom (a federal building) and suddenly it's a much greater offense in a lot of people's eyes.
I'm always kind of surprised that Majora's Mask got an E rating. Sure it sticks to Zelda formula of cartoony violence, but the story and some of the side quests in it are downright depressing/disturbing.
There's a difference between the player doing the killing and the player getting killed. Not to mention when Batman dies, there isn't a burst of blood or anything gruesome. It's just him falling over.
I believe there was no need for Dark Souls II to be rated Mature as there was no Quelaag type boss or anything like that?
There is that Scorpion lady but I don't think you can see her breasts.
Also less blood explosions on backstabs and parries.
About games being AO, I never understood the stigma for that rating. The precipice on which it stands just gets pushed further and further back as M gets more and more broad. There are plenty of unrated VN's or indie games that would definitely get an AO because of blatant sex scenes, though.
Not to mention Nintendo, Sony, & Microsoft don't allow AO games on their consoles. Only place is PC because there's no one to turn them down (maybe Steam now, but there's still ways to release an AO PC game).
While this discussion is somewhat interesting, I honestly don't think about ESRB ratings at all and have never put any thought into comparing ratings of different games.
May be because I'm old enough to play what I want and don't have kids yet.
This. I think Steam is against it as well... it's kind of sending your game out to die. Most "adult" games don't even bother with the ESRB anyways... Not only were their games never going to get anything besides AO, there is no regulation that states they need a rating to sell their game at all.
Yeah but like, why. Why's it such a big deal for a game to be AO. Devs already push it as far as they can on some games like Manhunt, GTA and Dante's Inferno.
So here is an interesting thought: Will we see an influx in AO games on next-gen consoles as bigger, digital only releases become popular? Or is it taboo across the industry now.
Not to mention Nintendo, Sony, & Microsoft don't allow AO games on their consoles. Only place is PC because there's no one to turn them down (maybe Steam now, but there's still ways to release an AO PC game).
This. I think Steam is against it as well... it's kind of sending your game out to die. Most "adult" games don't even bother with the ESRB anyways... Not only were their games never going to get anything besides AO, there is no regulation that states they need a rating to sell their game at all.
So here is an interesting thought: Will we see an influx in AO games on next-gen consoles as bigger, digital only releases become popular? Or is it taboo across the industry now.
Pretty sure all of the big 3 console manufacturers are against such games on their platforms period. Also, as I said above, if your game is going to get an AO rating, there is VERY VERY VERY little incentive to even bother with the ESRB... That's just another cost to incur to essentially be "black listed". There is no law in the US that says you have to have a game rated (though many people have tried in congress over the years).
I assume because they want to be careful of what their kids play or don't want to play the game with kids around. I never play M-rated games when my younger 12-year-old sister is around or awake. Plus my parents were actually aware of the rating system when I was growing up & I barely played any M-rated games until I was in high school, & even then, they would question some T-rated games. Wasn't until I was about 16 or so when they felt I was mature enough to play mature games.
I know people who used to take ratings seriously until they found out Halo was rated on the same level as Saw games when the game is on the same level as Star Wars.
Why don't you play when your 12 year old sister is awake or around? Plenty of kids turn out fine after playing Call of Duty
Your picture reminds me, I always found it odd Portable Ops and Peace Walker are the only T rated Metal Gear Solid games, besides non canon ones like Ghost Babel.
Metal Gear: Ghost Babel (Metal Gear Solid on GBC in the West) is rated E.
Now... there is no explicitly shown gore or swearing in that game. But anybody who's played it and remembers some of the events of the cutscenes and a few of the bosses will know how insane that rating is.
So here is an interesting thought: Will we see an influx in AO games on next-gen consoles as bigger, digital only releases become popular? Or is it taboo across the industry now.