Vampirolol
Member
My choice too.
Not enough graphics and violence, and too much time lost playing and solving puzzles instead of enjoying the plot which is why a hardcorl plays games.why isn't it GotY material? just curious.
why isn't it GotY material? just curious.
There's just no need for this.Haven't played it, but principally speaking, good on Gamespot for not going with the safe choice and picking a Japanese handheld game because they think it's the best game of the year.
Not giving a fuck about the community's wishes (wankers probably would've selected GTA or some shit) - clearly Giantbomb's good influence at work.
Not AAA enough, only on handheld consoles, usual stuff.![]()
Not enough graphics and violence, and too much time lost playing and solving puzzles instead of enjoying the plot which is why a hardcorl plays games.
By the way, how is the ultra casual focused medium called GS picking this game as a GOTY? I mean, they were the same ones that put ZombiU a 4 for not being a shooter, and now it seems they care about gameplay? Something big has had to happen there, maybe some staff has been replaced by proper gamers?
Not AAA enough, only on handheld consoles, usual stuff.![]()
It doesn't have long cutscenes breaking up the action.
I dont even think its a bold move.
I played both TLOU and GTAV and I think ALBW is the better game.
its only bold because people dont expect a handheld game to win, but it shouldnt be bold to pick a handheld game.
especially this year. the 3DS was a powerhouse, handhelds deserve to be recognized more and I am glad gamespot did that, it makes it less "bold" to pick a handheld GOTY in the future, which is how its supposed to be.
I'm currently playing TLoU and I stopped watching that video when I saw Ellie; I just don't want to see or learn anything from it before I experience it in game.handling a gun
That said, I'm surprised with their GOTY choice. I love my 3DS and I used to be a big Zelda fan, but the series has felt stale and stagnant to me for a good while now, and setting videos of A Link Between Worlds didn't excite me about it at all. Is it really any different from the Zelda formula that we've played many times before?
I guess good on them for picking something nonstandard.
But is it really good on them? Is the fact that they chose an unconventional GOTY in itself praiseworthy?
I'm starting to think a lot of great games are going to get snubbed by a bunch of sites' GOTY awards because they're "too obvious." And really that's kind of a shame, because while recognizing lesser known or unusual games for doing interesting and cool things is nice, to some degree it's dishonest to pick a GOTY just for the sake of giving the game more exposure.
I mean if everyone agreed that A Link Between Worlds really was the best game of the year then fine. I disagree, but hey, opinions. On the other hand if they picked it to get people talking about how they boldly didn't go for the obvious choice, then I think that's kind of dumb.
They selected a fricken handheld game as GotY? Isn't there a law against that?
Gamespot continues their slide into irrelevancy.
They selected a fricken handheld game as GotY? Isn't there a law against that?
Gamespot continues their slide into irrelevancy.
is this a joke post?
I'll assume that you're our example of Poe's Law in effect.
Serious as a heart attack, gentlemen.
Serious as a heart attack, gentlemen.
Thats a surprise. I like surprises.
TheLastOfUs, GTA V and Tearaway are higher on my personal list, though.
Okay, but I still won't play it. I want better graphics from a Zelda title.