• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Gamestop: Forced bundles are "Convenient" for Consumers

For real? If you can't return the items you don't want that is BS. Customer service my ass.

Yeah. they used to, but they closed that loophole quick! It seems the Gamestop stores found it unfair that they were being stuck with this useless garbage.

This bundling situation is interesting. There's no denying that it's crazy successful and profitable for the companies. hell, Walmart is even doing it now too for Switch bundles. We are going to see more and more stores start doing this because nobody is telling them they can't, and they're making a lot of money off of items that they normally make no money on. Someone, be it Nintendo, or a judge, is going to have to actively tell them they can't do it for this to stop.

I remember I worked at a Best Buy in the Portland market wthen the Xbox 360 launched, and the stores in the area were forcing bundles on people. It made the news and the district manager and a few other high ups got fired over it. I wonder if they work for Gamestop now....
 
I was under the impression that you could return unwanted items or sell them back. Honestly a manager tried to school me on it for a switch Zelda bundle, it seemed sketch. "Issa no from me"
 
Yeah. they used to, but they closed that loophole quick! It seems the Gamestop stores found it unfair that they were being stuck with this useless garbage.

This bundling situation is interesting. There's no denying that it's crazy successful and profitable for the companies. hell, Walmart is even doing it now too for Switch bundles. We are going to see more and more stores start doing this because nobody is telling them they can't, and they're making a lot of money off of items that they normally make no money on. Someone, be it Nintendo, or a judge, is going to have to actively tell them they can't do it for this to stop.

I remember I worked at a Best Buy in the Portland market wthen the Xbox 360 launched, and the stores in the area were forcing bundles on people. It made the news and the district manager and a few other high ups got fired over it. I wonder if they work for Gamestop now....

Does Nintendo have the power to do that, though? Short of refusing to supply a particular retailer, I can't imagine they have any grounds to police a retailer from bundling in this manner. Unless it somehow goes to the courts and it's determined to be anti-consumer?
 
9zBVKRtRqDRNhlE3T_agIPpdYkqapyMtqRiqsRs-wqfWhkdXRMBAyb8Xt1bflTN7Nrr5SU7DsysLjggVr_Go9xDPjL6E4VNmt18f.png

a0nV4xB.png


http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1377303
 
IIRC, I believe it goes by state if forced bundles are legal or not. I remember when my store was doing the Wii/PS3 launches, we were told that we couldn't do forced bundles, only suggested. But the year before, they did for PSP at launch (before I worked with them)

I think that Gamestop (and all the other companies) are able to get away with it online because those restrictions are different on a website versus a B&M store
 
Hey gamestop, you know what' convenient for consumer? An all digital future. How about you work on making that happen if you're so concerned about our convenience?

Does Nintendo have the power to do that, though? Short of refusing to supply a particular retailer, I can't imagine they have any grounds to police a retailer from bundling in this manner. Unless it somehow goes to the courts and it's determined to be anti-consumer?

I would think so. They choose who they supply inventory to. If they don't like how their products are being used to peddle the company's crap, they can just stop supplying the company with new product.
 
Hey gamestop, you know what' convenient for consumer? An all digital future. How about you work on making that happen if you're so concerned about our convenience?

Actually, I remember seeing rumors around the announcement of the Xbox One X about just this. IIRC they said that Microsoft would use Azure to let Gamestop facilitate buying/trading game keys for digital titles. Obviously that didn't pan out.

Honestly, I wish they at least attempt to match their competition. Literally no reason for me to buy games with them when Best Buy gives 20% off titles with GCU. I even have a local game store that gives coupons for 25% used games with every $5 pre-order.
 
Convenient for the consumer...how exactly? When you bundle a game with a system or sell a game with a pre-order bonus, that's one thing. When you an in-demand system with somewhat related physical items (but not really), that's another. Not illegal, but scummy...and borderline scalping.

This is why I rarely shop at GameStop anymore (I only nab things like exclusive amiibo from there) and I'm pretty much Best Buy exclusive. If I'm looking for old second-hand stuff, I'll check 2nd & Charles or a local video game store that doesn't force bundles or things I don't want with the sale of a video game.
 
Actually, I remember seeing rumors around the announcement of the Xbox One X about just this. IIRC they said that Microsoft would use Azure to let Gamestop facilitate buying/trading game keys for digital titles. Obviously that didn't pan out.

Honestly, I wish they at least attempt to match their competition. Literally no reason for me to buy games with them when Best Buy gives 20% off titles with GCU. I even have a local game store that gives coupons for 25% used games with every $5 pre-order.

Yeah, I agree. I'm sitting on $500 in their credit from the July trade in deals, and I don't even want to use it to get games for $60. I need to redeem them for Amazon gift cards like everyone else did.
 
I'm honestly surprised Nintendo doesn't care to clamp down on the Switch bundles.

Nintendo's profit is from their software, not their hardware; every Switch stuck in a bundle that no one wants to pay out the ass for is a Switch that's not in a costumer's hands, and every customer that would buy a Switch at MSRP but can't find one is a customer that's not also buying Zelda, MK8DX, Splatoon 2, ARMS, or whichever they want.
 
Obviously, this is bullshit. Gamestop sells bundles because it is a way to raise the price of the console without appearing to do so. It also allows them to make more money during console launches if there is a shortage (basically, people really want the console so they will pay more even thought they don't want some or all of the stuff in the bundle).
 
I'm honestly surprised Nintendo doesn't care to clamp down on the Switch bundles.

Nintendo's profit is from their software, not their hardware; every Switch stuck in a bundle that no one wants to pay out the ass for is a Switch that's not in a costumer's hands, and every customer that would buy a Switch at MSRP but can't find one is a customer that's not also buying Zelda, MK8DX, Splatoon 2, ARMS, or whichever they want.

It's very possible that Nintendo profits from their hardware and software. I suspect they don't clamp down on bundles because the retailers would punish them if they did (i.e. Gamespot wouldn't stock the Switch or would push PS4s and X1s instead of the Switch). A good example of a retailer punishing Nintendo is Amazon. Here is Amazon's page for the Switch https://www.amazon.com/Nintendo-Switch-Gray-Joy-Con/dp/B01LTHP2ZK/ref=sr_1_3?s=videogames&ie=UTF8&qid=1504212220&sr=1-3&keywords=nintendo%2Bswitch&th=1 . Notice that the price is well above MSRP (i.e. $299)? Also, notice it's only sold by third party resellers?
 
It's very possible that Nintendo profits from their hardware and software.

It's possible there's a slight profit from hardware at this point, but the lion's share is from software. They shipped Switches via air earlier this year to meet demand, which would suggest that Nintendo is prioritizing getting the console to customers over eeking out every penny from hardware.

I suspect they don't clamp down on bundles because the retailers would punish them if they did (i.e. Gamespot wouldn't stock the Switch or would push PS4s and X1s instead of the Switch). A good example of a retailer punishing Nintendo is Amazon. Here is Amazon's page for the Switch https://www.amazon.com/Nintendo-Switch-Gray-Joy-Con/dp/B01LTHP2ZK/ref=sr_1_3?s=videogames&ie=UTF8&qid=1504212220&sr=1-3&keywords=nintendo%2Bswitch&th=1 . Notice that the price is well above MSRP (i.e. $299)? Also, notice it's only sold by third party resellers?

That's because Amazon's out of stock and the scalpers are using Amazon to sell them; Amazon isn't controlling resellers to punish Nintendo. There's nothing to suggest that Amazon is punishing Nintendo, and Gamestop refusing to sell their most popular item probably isn't going to happen.
 
Wait... "Memory stick"? As in, an actual Memory Stick? Wut? Also I'm pretty sure most people don't want 1-2 Switch or all that other junk.
 
I would think so. They choose who they supply inventory to. If they don't like how their products are being used to peddle the company's crap, they can just stop supplying the company with new product.

Well yeah, that's what I was saying. I don't think they can go beyond that though, which the other poster seemed to be suggesting. Frankly, since Gamestop/think geek has already shown their hand as far their bundles, I would love for Nintendo to step in and say they can't sell their Minis in that fashion or they risk having their allocations taken away.
 
I wouldn't have been able to get a Switch when I did if it weren't for the GameStop bundle. It's a shitty practice from a shitty company but I had the means to purchase one when I really wanted one.
 
"Good day, shopkeep, I would like to buy this fine sandwich right here."

"Alright m8, but you're gonna have to get some marmalade and condoms with that."

"But I don't need marmalade or condoms!"

"Yeah, but you might, more convenient that way. That'll be ÂŁ20"
 
The only way it's convenient is it's such a terrible idea that it often allows people to buy products that scalpers would otherwise buy. Obviously, the extra price is just as terrible, but I'd rather someone overpay a store for a product than a scalper.

That might just be me thinking scalpers are the scum of the earth, though.
 
At least it cuts into scalper profit margins

Yeah, that's the only real upside. Scalpers will balk at some $250 SNESC Bundle allowing the people who really want it to buy it as opposed to the "Haha! I bought 5 thanks to my 3 different accounts. You snooze you lose suckers! Now pay up!" scalpers.
 
Attach is a wonderful thing.

BTW, if you think Nintendo is upset with Switch bundles (or any bundles), you are mistaken. Greatly.

Edit: The SNES Thinkgeek bundles are pretty poop.
 
ThinkGeek bundles for the SNES Classic:

SNES Classic + Mega Man Helmet & Proto Man Buster - $249.99
79.99, 159.99, 79.99

SNES Classic + Street Fighter Statue - $199.99
79.99, 124.99

SNES Classic + BotW Slate & Shield Backpack - $169.99
79.99, 29.99, 59.99

SNES Classic + Tetris Lamp & Super Mario Canteen - $139.99
79.99, 39.99, 19.99

SNES Classic + Zelda Light & Chess Set - $189.99
79.99, 35.99, 74.99

SNES Classic + BotW Canvas - $329.99
79.99, 249.99

SNES Classic + Super Mario Plush, Mug & Calendar - $154.99
79.99, 44.99, 14.99, 14.99


ALL of that is a bunch of unnecessary shit that is not convenient for anyone whatsoever.

Are you telling me the only way to get a SNES classic is buying a bundle or you can get just the SNES alone?

Because if the bundle stuff the only way they should be shamed of that
 
Attach is a wonderful thing.

BTW, if you think Nintendo is upset with Switch bundles (or any bundles), you are mistaken. Greatly.

Yup, it just helps Nintendo move another overpriced set of Joycons. They couldn't give fewer shits. It's not like they're sitting on shelves for months or something. Nintendo is still getting their cash, and even more than they would for just the console.

If there's one thing Nintendo couldn't care less about, it's the shopping experience of their customers.
 
Some of that stuff on Think Geek is just... wow. And yet it is the best defense against scalping a retailer has used so far (however unintentionally.) I am so torn!
 

At least a riding lawnmower and raw beef have actual uses - I can't say the same for a full-size Mega Man helmet or fake Minecraft tools. Forced bundles only exist as a way for Gamestop to dump non-selling overstock on people who are trying to buy products they actually want; there's no 'convenient' about it. This shit is one of the many reasons I don't shop there (or Thinkgeek).
 
You know that Best Buy also sells used games, right? And would likely stand to gain the most from Gamestop's demise in the brick and mortar arena?

The practice wouldn't vanish overnight, but nobody else pushes it as aggressively as GameStop. Would Best Buy continue with the hassle of used inventory given how much smaller a proportion of their business it represents? Without a major competitor that focuses on the practice? Maybe.
 
They should just come out and say 'we have to make money somehow while the trade in industry shrinks and digital sales rises'.
 
I mean is this really something to get that worked up over?

Those bundles on Gamestop sell out pretty god damn fast so it's not like no one is buying these things. I would know, I thought about buying one a few times before finding a Switch at Walmart.

Also, unless my math is shit they weren't exactly jacking the price up on anything, most of the deals were actually just that...deals. Or at the very least the exact price you'd pay buying all that shit anyways.

Ya'll acting like Gamestop is holding these things hostage. If you don't like the bundle then don't buy it and when they don't sell I'm sure Gamestop would change it up.

Unfortunately for you, they sell like hot cakes. So what's the problem here?
 
I'm kinda lucky that I bought into the good bundle that they offered, which was a Switch, Zelda, Zelda season pass, Fast RMX, Shovel Knight, and Snipper Clippers. With the exception of Snipper Clippers these were games I was already gonna buy with the console so with that, plus only paying around $100 with the trade-ins, I lucked out. All their other bundles for the Switch have been trash.
 
I mean, it is convenient in one way; it let the people that dearly wanted a snes mini to get a snes mini.
 
Edit: read the article... is this... is this legal??

That would be like pulling up to a gas station, and being told I can't buy gas unless I buy a bag of chips and a pop... no?

Of course, a lot of stuff is legal in the US. A gas station has too much competition to pull shit like that but Gamestop evidently doesn't.

It's different in the EU where forced bundling is actually illegal.
 
Top Bottom