Ms Hamm![]()
Seriously, that's in game, it's not fanart or anything.
Go home Gearbox, you're drunk.
I'm sorry, but I didn't design, draw, or have anything to do with Moxxi at any point in my life. But if you're bringing her up, I'd say the main differences between her and something like the sorceress are that she's sexualized for a reason that makes sense, and that she actually resembles an actual person somewhat. I should clarify that it's not just a matter of the boobs themselves that makes it super weird, at least not for me. It's actually the tiny, featureless, expressionless face..Constructive criticism is always the best, but to say that an artist's work should be shielded "the worst of it" is a bit naieve, as even that can be informative if you're getting enough of it v: You open yourself up to that when you release something to the public,
At least she apologized for being an asshole.
Fertility idols have been around as long as art itself. They are always highly sexualized and have exaggerated parts of anatomy attributed to fertility. That doesn't justify the Sorceress because honestly it's an enormous stretch. The Sorceress doesn't have to have any reason to have big breasts beyond the simple fact that big breasts are appealing. Sorceresses have had big breasts in media for a long time, especially gaming.
Duke Nuke'em gets a pass because A) MMeriika! B)PaycheckThe reason people are mentioning the company she works for is, well, because she works there, and as a result she makes money from that company.
When she complains about someones sexualized art, when she is part of a company that makes *MAINSTREAM* games with this kind of art, and even more offensive stuff, it becomes a blatant act of hypocrisy.
If she was truly against it, she wouldn't work at a company that produces similar, or worse, art in mainstream games that is intended for a much larger audience.
Besides the fact that this is a really dumb thing to say she is attractive anyway.
Given that there are a multitude of references to art history apparent many of the designs in Dragon's Crown and previous works, I would say it's not much of a stretch at all.
Fertility idols have been around as long as art itself. They are always highly sexualized and have exaggerated parts of anatomy attributed to fertility. That doesn't justify the Sorceress because honestly it's an enormous stretch. The Sorceress doesn't have to have any reason to have big breasts beyond the simple fact that big breasts are appealing. Sorceresses have had big breasts in media for a long time, especially gaming.
Frank F. Love that mans work.Female warriors in fantasy settings have always been depicted as beautiful scantily clad Amazons. This is nothing new. So, she has big breasts. Are we really that threatened by large breasts. You would think there are no women in the world above a b-cup.
My opinion on this matter is this - if an artist wants to draw a female character with a well developed chest, it is his right as an artist to do so. I don't have to like it, but I have no right to tell him he must change it.
Frank Frazetta was one of the greatest fantasy artists ever. Maybe we should start censoring his works as well.
![]()
Female warriors in fantasy settings have always been depicted as beautiful scantily clad Amazons. This is nothing new. So, she has big breasts. Are we really that threatened by large breasts. You would think there are no women in the world above a b-cup.
My opinion on this matter is this - if an artist wants to draw a female character with a well developed chest, it is his right as an artist to do so. I don't have to like it, but I have no right to tell him he must change it.
Frank Frazetta was one of the greatest fantasy artists ever. Maybe we should start censoring his works as well.
![]()
he's talking about duke nukem, right?
Rachel Dratch?She looks like the comedian that sometimes has weird cameos in 30rock....and I have no idea what her name is. From the Debbie Downer gif that's way over used.
So what if it even is? That won't justify shit to the people who seem to care about this. Fertility Idols are the definition of sexualized. That doesn't suddenly give the Sorceress a good reason to have enormous breasts and hips. It is the what it is, the game doesn't need to justify anything anything. People need to stop vehemently defending this, people will always have their opinions.
I'm going to now buy three copies of Dragons Crown.
No, it gets called out over in OT too.Absolutely we should be better. Again, I'm not endorsing the comment, and I myself would never be so blatantly mean-spirited. I just don't know why the hammer of justice fell on him so quickly when most of the time all have a merry laugh over in the OT when the same stuff occurs.
And yes, that IS what he was doing. That just didn't seem to be the main reason people were so upset by it.
![]()
dude..
nothing..
He's an environmental artist. Why do people keep tying him to borderlands assists that he had nothing to do with? Shitty phrases aside the guy makes a pretty good point, but there are far bigger offenders to go after. Like that new side scrolling game that has the wizard lady with Hindenburg tits.
You know...I'm starting to worry we judged Bob just that tiny bit too harshly (probably not) - there is the SLIGHT chance he was referring to her femininity. (in that photo - but then again dragon's crown is a beatemup so).
Joke, at least I hope so.*blinks*
That design document of the positions of aliens raping women in DNK is absurd. Seriously, what the hell?
I'm not sure that makes it any better.
Vehemently?I've always thought it asinine and will continue to mock this shit from the ramparts.
That's a keeper!Playing catchup on the thread, but it seems the point she was trying to make was that the sexualized character designs will put women off to this game, and gaming altogether as a hobby.
My wife doesn't play games, so I showed her the sorceress character. Her response was as follows:
"Cool, what type of magic can she do?"
So then I explained to her the controversey and what this Gearbox artist had to say. Her response was as follows:
"It's a fantasy game, I mean, putting aside that an artist is bashing someone else's art, I have more of a problem with someone generalizing all women to say we would or should be offended by it. Also its art, so you are telling others they shouldn't appreciate it because you're projecting some meaning that's not there. It's messed up. Did it get cancelled?"
Me: No
Wife: "Good, it's a stupid argument."
Your wife seems fairly rational. Thumbs up.My wife doesn't play games, so I showed her the sorceress character. Her response was as follows:
"Cool, what type of magic can she do?"
Vehemently?
Of course you wouldn't.If you're trying to make a point please express it with your words. No idea what you're even trying to convey to me.
It's been out of hand for months. On the bright side, it should be out of everyone's systems by the time the game is actually out.
It might even sell!
Of course you wouldn't.
I'll leave it at that.
AVATAR QUOTE-OO!If you don't like it, don't put other people off it.
I agree to a large extent.Seriously. Games developers/industry types have to stop talking. Outside of some PR speak and a limited number of knowledgeable developers who know what the hell they are talking about, everyone else needs gag orders.
No True Scotsman is the best of all logical fallacies. Good on your wife for catching that immediately."It's a fantasy game, I mean, putting aside that an artist is bashing someone else's art, I have more of a problem with someone generalizing all women to say we would or should be offended by it. Also its art, so you are telling others they shouldn't appreciate it because you're projecting some meaning that's not there. It's messed up. Did it get cancelled?"
Me: No
Wife: "Good, it's a stupid argument."
reposting this:
![]()
I personally like a little variety in game artwork. If a game is released with an artstyle I don't care for, I may not play the game. What I will not do is find myself a soapbox to climb on to complain about how the art in that game has ruined my life and must be changed.
I like the artstyle of DC. It reminds me of reading old issues of Heavy Metal back in the day. Do I think real women look like this? No, I don't. But this is a fantasy game, these are not real women or men for that matter.
When was the last itme you saw a guy that looked like this? This is an exaggerated expression of the male form, yet no one is raging about this.
Cheers to her. I'd begun to forget what a rational response looked like.Playing catchup on the thread, but it seems the point she was trying to make was that the sexualized character designs will put women off to this game, and gaming altogether as a hobby.
My wife doesn't play games, so I showed her the sorceress character. Her response was as follows:
"Cool, what type of magic can she do?"
So then I explained to her the controversey and what this Gearbox artist had to say. Her response was as follows:
"It's a fantasy game, I mean, putting aside that an artist is bashing someone else's art, I have more of a problem with someone generalizing all women to say we would or should be offended by it. Also its art, so you are telling others they shouldn't appreciate it because you're projecting some meaning that's not there. It's messed up. Did it get cancelled?"
Me: No
Wife: "Good, it's a stupid argument."
http://lh3.ggpht.com/-tBVEmTRrIwk/TwH86YnIbrI/AAAAAAAAAe8/mwc_Q5KecGs/jacket.jpg
As you can see it's pretty obvious why she's so upset
Rachel Dratch?
I have no idea, I've never seen 30 Rock.
EDIT: Your edit confirms Rachel Dratch.
Here's the digest version of the debate:PSY・S;56463796 said:Reading through this thread is tiring.