At what point is it legally slander?
When Democrats do it.
At what point is it legally slander?
Lawrence O'Donnell went in on Kelly: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6_p7hwUl3o
Hes worse than that. Luckily his credibility was destroyed over that moment, theres a reason why no one talks about him anymore aside from rightly mocking him as a fraud. Remember how often he was praised in the run up to the election?
Yes. Hes an outright fraud as a pundit and if he had any self respect would quit and draft up a sincere apology for how much of a stooge hes been in that role. What he does outside of CNN doesnt expunge what hes said on CNN.
My take:
There is a transcript, but it confirms the Congresswomans account, so they are pretending it doesnt exist. Trump is too stupid to know that he said exactly what they say he said.
Lawrence O'Donnell went in on Kelly: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6_p7hwUl3o
So he committed fraud on what exactly?
Both. There's a transcript and Lara hasn't read it
I imagine the only thing he knows about him is that "presidential" line.
Who said anything about committing fraud? Being a fraud can just mean being a fake or a liar, doesn't mean anything criminal occurred.
Interesting. Thanks for enlightening me.Pretty sure both are acceptable.
Bold-faced meaning youre putting on a brave face when lying (pretty straightforward). Bald-faced referred to an old superstition that men with beards were hiding something, so if you told a bald-faced lie it meant you didnt have facial hair but were lying anyway, and this was worse because you wouldnt expect someone with no beard to lie like that.
The fact that he's sticking to his position despite being completely and utterly called out is fucking wild. Administration's willingness to just outright take a bullet to the face for Trump and spin out absolute falsehoods, destroying his creditability in the process is par the course for most... But Kelly as CoS has always been painted as the adult in the room by media. Now it's fake news peddling top to bottom. No one is exempt, no one is clear, there really is no one reasonable in the administration holding the reigns, just varying degrees of awful.
Goddamn. That's straight up 1st degree murder.
But he's a Gold Star army family man.
Lawrence O'Donnell went in on Kelly: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6_p7hwUl3o
Lawrence O'Donnell went in on Kelly: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6_p7hwUl3o
I've always been under the impression that some jobs have more of an impact on someone's identity and way of thinking. I think it shows in the way people treat Kelly more like a general than a politician. From what I've seen on television I also thought he carried himself more as the former rather than the latter. At this point I just think he's more a liar than anything else, though.He's a politician. He holds a political office.
Lawrence O'Donnell went in on Kelly: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6_p7hwUl3o
CNNs headline right now, at least on mobile, is pretty good
"Women were sacred."
Fuck you John Kelly. Things were great back when women were expected to be sacred symbols in a man's family huh?
Well sure, I didn't expect him to come back that he committed a crime. I just don't understand how he's a fraud and then discount what he actually does for a living. Van Jones is a genuine activist, what does Van Jones promote? Activism and he has his own perspective about it. I initially responded to someone who suggested to the unknowing that listening to Van Jones would be dangerous, which is blatantly ridiculous. He had an opinion many didn't like, fair, that makes him a fraud because?
Okay, how is he harming the progressive movement while on CNN. Genuinely what has he done on TV that actually harms the movement.I said hes a fraud as a pundit, since he claims to be a progressive. Hes just a stooge, and actively harmful to the progressive movement when hes on TV looking like a completely weak fool. Thats separate from his work in activism, which I frankly think pales in comparison to how much damage the presidential moment did and his pathetic walk back after the fact.
Okay, how is he harming the progressive movement while on CNN. Genuinely what has he done on TV that actually harms the movement.
Lawrence O'Donnell went in on Kelly: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6_p7hwUl3o
Could Wilson not lay libel charges against him for this? I mean, it would be hard to square that circle in legal defense, no?
. At this point I just think he's more a liar than anything else, though.
I was actually at the gym watching one of the TVs that had CNN on during his press conference.
I don't know if I trusted Kelly as the adult in the room, necessarily. I did, however, expect some degree of decorum from him. My jaw dropped when the text on the bottom screen started summarizing his insults of Representative Wilson. What the fuck? Why was it even necessary to go that far? I get the lying part. Going the extra mile to smear the Rep. for listening to the call (didn't even know she was a family friend but even before that it didn't strike me as odd) is fucking ridiculous.
Kelly is going to be shelved for a while methinks.
So how soon before Lara tweets the transcripts with the "see nothing too hide" message?
Sad a 4 star general has stooped to this
Kelly is going to be shelved for a while methinks.
He used the name of his own son to add authority in a transparent attempt to give cover to Trump in, what we learned today, was a lie. It was bad enough even without the lie, but now? Good lord. The man shredded his reputation in a day for nothing. He should be utterly ashamed of himself.
I dunno almost sounds like Kelly is what trump wanted The Mooch to beKelly is going to be shelved for a while methinks.
But he made Trump happy for a brief moment in time! Isn't that what matters in life, in the end?
I dunno almost sounds like Kelly is what trump wanted The Mooch to be
In the hours after President Donald Trump said on an Oct. 17 radio broadcast that he had contacted nearly every family that had lost a military servicemember this year, the White House was hustling to learn from the Pentagon the identities and contact information for those families, according to an internal Defense Department email.
The email exchange, which has not been previously reported, shows that senior White House aides were aware on the day the president made the statement that it was not accurate but that they should try to make it accurate as soon as possible, given the gathering controversy.
Not only had the president not contacted virtually all the families of military personnel killed this year, the White House did not even have an up-to-date list of those who had been killed.
These people are equal parts vicious and stupid...
http://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/after-trump-claim-white-house-still-lacked-casualty-list
This is a nice behind the scenes look at the Trump says something very stupid, aides desperately try to cover the tracks cycle.
I expected it, but to hear hes barely made any calls, after all his bloviating just drives me up a wall.These people are equal parts vicious and stupid...
http://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/after-trump-claim-white-house-still-lacked-casualty-list