Mr. Pointy
Member
Do you sound like Tony Todd?Am I this thread's boogeyman now. You got people up in here invoking my name like Candyman.
Do you sound like Tony Todd?Am I this thread's boogeyman now. You got people up in here invoking my name like Candyman.
Not everybody thinks the same. I like the ghost design, but didn't find the jokes funny or the characters interesting enough.Why is this a bad thing? I don't get this attitude at all. Movie looks great.
Why is this a bad thing? I don't get this attitude at all. Movie looks great.
I mean for all the shit Bobby Roberts is getting it's funny how often they ignore that he's said he doesn't think the trailers have been that hot.
Total Bisquit has a comment on Screen Junkies video, and again he takes the "sexism is one of the factors" and read as "everyone who complains is sexist" =P
And here is the dude in the video's reply to his post
Total Bisquit has a comment on Screen Junkies video, and again he takes the "sexism is one of the factors" and read as "everyone who complains is sexist" =P
You're free from criticism if you don't like the trailer and still talk shit?
When your criticism literally boils down to accusing someone who doesn't like the trailer of saying that everyone who doesn't like the trailer is sexist... yes
Are you a psychologist? because I'm amazed you're getting all that from his comment.Totalbiscuit has the worst reactions to things for a smart person.
The Screen Junkies video was one of the most balanced things I've seen on the subject. You have to have buried your head in the sand pretty deeply to have somehow missed criticisms of the Ghostbusters remake that are clearly sexist.
Like Donald Trump's take on the matter.
THEY'RE REMAKING GHOSTBUSTERS WITH ONLY WOMEN. WHAT'S GOING ON?
Clearly the voice of someone who would feel exactly the same way if the movie had men playing the team.
To argue that sexism plays no part in making the trailer the most hated trailer, when it's clearly getting some hate for casting women as the leads, it's transparent nonsense.
Again, Total Biscuit doesn't want to have to stop to check if he's being sexist, or to ever have to hear about sexism. It might make him feel bad or stop him enjoying something he's into. Because he's a privileged white guy who can't get his head around the fact that life gave him more oppurtunities since he mistakenly thinks that such a thing invalidates everything he's ever achieved for himself.
OMG ITS A MOVIE ABOUT PEOPLE PEW PEWING GHOSTS.
Over 2,000 posts mainly complaining about a second trailer for a movie you all know you're going to see.
Are you a psychologist? because I'm amazed you're getting all that from his comment.
It's a pattern of behaviour I've seen in him going back to his reactions to the gamergate bullshit. He gets very emotional and over reacts. This is just exhibit G or whatever for me.
In a video they suggest that part of why this trailer gets hated the most is because of sexism. In the same video they also say they don't think sexism is the biggest factor.
Do you think if TB had waited to process all of their points before posting he'd have posted what he did? Why did he strongly criticize them for mentioning sexism as part of the problem? Why was he so upset that they mentioned the sexist criticism that the movie has unquestionably faced?
The way I see it, he's upset about it either because he's sexist (which I don't believe) or to be kinder (and what I believe to be more likely) he doesn't want to be challenged with thoughts of whether or not his feelings about something might be sexist.
Can you think of any other reason for his overly emotional reaction to a very tame and factually accurate comment?
He's literally upset at them for mentioning actual sexism that's actually happening. So yeah... he clearly didn't want to have to hear or think about sexism when watching a video about the Ghostbusters remake.
It's a pattern of behaviour I've seen in him going back to his reactions to the gamergate bullshit. He gets very emotional and over reacts. This is just exhibit G or whatever for me.
In a video they suggest that part of why this trailer gets hated the most is because of sexism. In the same video they also say they don't think sexism is the biggest factor.
Do you think if TB had waited to process all of their points before posting he'd have posted what he did? Why did he strongly criticize them for mentioning sexism as part of the problem? Why was he so upset that they mentioned the sexist criticism that the movie has unquestionably faced?
The way I see it, he's upset about it either because he's sexist (which I don't believe) or to be kinder (and what I believe to be more likely) he doesn't want to be challenged with thoughts of whether or not his feelings about something might be sexist.
Can you think of any other reason for his overly emotional reaction to a very tame and factually accurate comment?
He's literally upset at them for mentioning actual sexism that's actually happening. So yeah... he clearly didn't want to have to hear or think about sexism when watching a video about the Ghostbusters remake.
What's your take on the overly emotional reaction against Jame's tame video?
let me give you the TLR of my previous post about it.
People are confusing 'My panties are a bunch because this movie wasn't made for me' with 'My panties are a bunch because this movie was made for women'.
People who are genuinely sexist love pretending that they aren't. Part of why they do this, is to get well meaning people to lash out at people that aren't sexist at all, fostering sympathy for anyone criticizing the thing and helping feed into the notion that it's those nasty feminists yelling at clouds that is the problem, not the thing in question.
James didn't deserve to get caught in that crossfire. He is blameless in this.
However his video was really dumb... and I would still rip it to shreds even if the remake starred only men. Because his reasons for not liking it are selfish and petty and entitled.
They aren't sexist though!
Personally how I read it is that this is just a comment he's been wanting to make about the topic on a whole and that was just the video he happened to make it under, could I be wrong? certainly but I just got a general straw that breaks the camel back kinda thing from it. In any even I believe his point about band wagoning is a point as you can see the same thing happen with that COD trailer where it pretty much to became a parody of itself and them the band wagoning in likes for that Battlefield trailer released shortly after.
That's cool and all and I disagree wholeheartedly that his video and reasoning are dumb.
But I was asking about the negative reactions toward his video.
let me give you the TLR of my previous post about it.
People are confusing 'My panties are a bunch because this movie wasn't made for me' with 'My panties are a bunch because this movie was made for women'.
People who are genuinely sexist love pretending that they aren't. Part of why they do this, is to get well meaning people to lash out at people that aren't sexist at all, fostering sympathy for anyone criticizing the thing and helping feed into the notion that it's those nasty feminists yelling at clouds that is the problem, not the thing in question.
James didn't deserve to get caught in that crossfire. He is blameless in this.
However his video was really dumb... and I would still rip it to shreds even if the remake starred only men. Because his reasons for not liking it are selfish and petty and entitled.
They aren't sexist though!
So let me get this straight. You think someones opinion on a summer movie are selfish? Petty? Entitled? On a movie. A piece of entertainment. Jesus, this is madness.
Yeah. Thinking a movie should cater to you, and vocally refusing to watch it because it doesn't...
what words would you use to describe such a thing?
Opinion.
Yeah. And I answered that. Let me quote my post and bold the relevant bit for you. And I think his reasons are selfish, petty and entitled. Not idiotic.
Yeah. Thinking a movie should cater to you, and vocally refusing to watch it because it doesn't...
what words would you use to describe such a thing?
Yeah. Thinking a movie should cater to you, and vocally refusing to watch it because it doesn't...
what words would you use to describe such a thing?
Whats the point of calling it Ghostbusters then? Oh and speaking of Terminator Genisys the worst thing about that movie was the complete bastardization of the original characters. Especially Reese.Yeah. Thinking a movie should cater to you, and vocally refusing to watch it because it doesn't...
what words would you use to describe such a thing?
I'd honestly rather read people insisting all the hate for the trailers was a sexist conspiracy than bad faith attempts like this to drag the original. At least the people who are claiming sexism have a leg to stand on. The character work in GB is flawless. It was one of those invincible "perfect chemistry" casts like Seinfeld. It's not a fucking Paul Blart movie.People just wanted to see more Bill Murray covered in lube.
You know... witty jokes.
Dan Akroyd dreaming about getting BJ'ed by a ghost.
Not just some cheap, random sex jokes.
"People who are genuinely sexist love pretending that they aren't. Part of why they do this, is to get well meaning people to lash out at people that aren't sexist at all, fostering sympathy for anyone criticizing the thing and helping feed into the notion that it's those nasty feminists yelling at clouds that is the problem, not the thing in question."
I read this like 10 times and still don't understand how it ties to what I was asking.
So the sexist people made other non-sexist people bash Jame's video? Or people bashing Jame's videos are closet sexist? I mean, some of them did attack his wife too so I guess that could be true as well.
Does anyone have a link to the thread where it was rumored that it would be an all female cast? I found the one that announced the cast, with a lot of complaint about McCarthy being in it and asking who the other two actresses were, but I just want to read what people said or thought when it was announced that it would be an all female cast. Or when a reboot was announced. Basically, I just wonder at what point did this movie get poisoned. Was it at birth, when announced as a remake? Or the all female cast? Or when the casting was announced? Or when they started shooting and we saw some on location photos? By the time we got that first trailer, it seemed people were gunning for this movie to tank.
I hope this movie turns out well and performs well enough. I look forward to it.
'His reasons for not liking it are opinion'.
That doesn't quite work.
If you're not gonna answer my question then this is just a waste of time.*BECAUSE* sexist people often pretend that their issues with something have nothing to do with sexism, people who are upset about sexism will often times take aim against people that aren't sexist at all.
It's part of why many sexist people will pretend their issues with a given thing have nothing to do with sex. Not just to hide themselves, but because every time someone takes a swing at someone who isn't sexist, it helps make feminists look bad and helps fuel the notion that the issue isn't actually sexism, but overly aggressive feminists.
Or to put it plainly... a lot of sexist people are pretending to merely be Ghostbusters nerds like James and saying that is what justifies their hate. That makes people look at actual Ghostbusters nerds with suspicion. Some of them get too trigger happy and someone that you and I know to be a true Ghostbusters nerd is suddenly being called a sexist because he's exhibiting the same behaviours that many sexists were mimicking.
Crystal?
Whats the point of calling it Ghostbusters then?
Oh and speaking of Terminator Genisys the worst thing about that movie was the complete bastardization of the original characters. Especially Reese.
"His reasons for not liking the concept behind this reboot are entirely his own opinions."
It works perfectly well.
If you're not gonna answer my question then this is just a waste of time.
I've answered your questions. What part do you think I haven't answered? You wanted to know why I thought people were unfairly attacking James. I told you why I think it happens. Because those people are seeing behaviors in James that they have come to expect from sexist people and formed the wrong conclusion that James is sexist.
That's what I think.
Actually James never says in the video the new GB shouldn't exist but OK.
Thank you.
It says absolutely nothing. Are you one of those people who think all opinions are created equally?
![]()
![]()
![]()
Say what you want about Rolfe but he doesn't deserve this.
Again, Total Biscuit doesn't want to have to stop to check if he's being sexist, or to ever have to hear about sexism. It might make him feel bad or stop him enjoying something he's into. Because he's a privileged white guy who can't get his head around the fact that life gave him more oppurtunities since he mistakenly thinks that such a thing invalidates everything he's ever achieved for himself.
I was mostly lurking, but I wanted to comment on this. Is a guy that may be dying of cancer in his early 30s really considers privileged?
I was mostly lurking, but I wanted to comment on this. Is a guy that may be dying of cancer in his early 30s really considers privileged?
Yes.
Yes.
Say what you want about Rolfe but he doesn't deserve this.
Yes.
Has the whole collage from the AVGN thread been posted?
Then I'll just say I highly disagree and leave it at that.
I was mostly lurking, but I wanted to comment on this. Is a guy that may be dying of cancer in his early 30s really considers privileged?