Yeah, but if they shot in the correct ratios they could you know...account for it before hand.
Correct ratios?
Yeah, but if they shot in the correct ratios they could you know...account for it before hand.
I don't mind it, I zoom in on movies myself just to lessen the black bars. They should add the option though to watch it in the original way though.
I wish painters would start using A4. The Mona Lisa doesn't fill my paper!
There's a difference between Pixar doing it (do they still even do this, btw?) and someone going into photoshop. Pixar has the source-files, and they get the director in there to essentially recompose the shots. At least they used to.
I guarantee you dude didn't check with David Lean before popping open Photoshop
No they don't at least not for me. I regularly watch more than one movie a week and I regularly receive big movies day one, and my turnaround is only limited by the mail delivery.Netflix is absolute shit for streaming and they do a ton of annoying things. Hell, they even throttle their disc service if you watch more than one disc a week, so they pretty much suck on all fronts. Not sure why I still use their service.
Wait, how are you getting Inglorious Basterds and Prometheus on instant watch? They're not available for me (US).
Haha.I gave a presentation about this in my public speaking class like 6-7 years back. Everybody, except for one person, didn't understand and just told me to buy a widescreen tv when I got peoples comments back. I even printed off a bunch of examples and nobody really seemed to care.
Is this just on TVs? Because I get black bars when watching on a computer.
First of all, the term "classic film ratio" is hilarious since movies started 4:3, and TV's started 4:3 because they were mimicking the look of film. It was only when TV's became more and more popular, threatening the box office, that films got wider and wider to try and give an experience you couldn't get at home (doubly funny because initially the point was "Look at how much more you see in the theater! So much beautiful imagery!" which was totally forgotten or misremembered decades later as "Why are they covering things with black bars?".
Secondly, I want you to imagine how this would look cropped to 16x9, let alone 4:3:
How do you even convey the same image properly? You don't. One person is cut out no matter how you crop it, simple as that, dramatically changing the composition, balance and information presented in the shot.
It's just impossible. There will always be uneducated people whining about black bars "covering up" their movies or "shrinking" the image on their TV.regular people don't like the black bars. simple as.
perhaps movie studios and tv companies should do a better job educating their customers.
i remember how much my mind was blown when i watched this scene in widescreen for the first time:
on my old vhs, Ray and Egon didnt even exist.
Maybe just Egon now that i think about it
Those people need to accept the black bars or learn how to use the zoom button on their remote.regular people don't like the black bars. simple as.
perhaps movie studios and tv companies should do a better job educating their customers.
But you can't adequately frame for 4:3, 16x9, 2.35:1, 2.40:1, etc, you can't frame for all those ratios at the same time. You could theoretically shoot so there is extra unused information (as I've already said some films are shot "open matte"), but again your composition is only going to be for the ratio you choose, so "opening it up" is going to again alter the composition by adding dead space above and below, or to the sides depending on how the image was shot and how it's being changed. So even though all the elements are still present, it's still altering the composition. Placing a character in the middle of a frame is different than putting them against the edge. Suddenly adding more head room or nose room is changing that intent. Your idea is not a workable solution.You're going the wrong way about it though. Let's say you did want to do a 4:3 standard you wouldn't shoot the image as if you were cropping off the side, you'd shoot it so that you add to the top and bottom of the image. More blue sky on top and more brown dirt on the bottom, while keeping the 2 men, the distance between them, and all other image information in the scene exactly as you have it shown. Obviously though you can't do that to an existing movie like this, but if the director knew before hand that he had to do 4:3, then he'd use the 4:3 camera and simply shoot the scene from farther back, allowing the exact same image you show, plus added imagery on the top and bottom.
Same principle for putting an ultra-widescreen scene into a 16:9 frame. You don't crop out image information, you add it. Again though, you couldn't do it for movies that already exist, but you could make it so future movies would all correspond to the same ratio and it wouldn't limit directors and artists in what they could do. I'm pretty sure directors and artists really hate to see their movies get completely butchered up in the editing room for TV syndication and/or know that there are a bunch of people out there zooming in their works and cutting off the edges of the scenes. At least if there was some sort of standard set, then they'd know everyone is viewing the exact same thing in the exact same way so every scene gets the same message across across all platforms.
I personally can deal with black bars because I like to have the proper aspect ratio and all of the scene in the picture, but it does seem a bit silly at times to have a 50" screen and only get to use 70% of it.
But you can't adequately frame for 4:3, 16x9, 2.35:1, 2.40:1, etc, you can't frame for all those ratios at the same time. You could theoretically shoot so there is extra unused information (as I've already said some films are shot "open matte"), but again your composition is only going to be for the ratio you choose, so "opening it up" is going to again alter the composition by adding dead space above and below, or to the sides depending on how the image was shot and how it's being changed. So even though all the elements are still present, it's still altering the composition. Placing a character in the middle of a frame is different than putting them against the edge. Suddenly adding more head room or nose room is changing that intent. Your idea is not a workable solution.
Because the scenes that changed out of the black borders were shot in imax.Oh, how about trying to explain to people why the Bluray scenes of The Dark Knight keeps changing sizes. Good luck with that.
Oh, how about trying to explain to people why the Bluray scenes of The Dark Knight keeps changing sizes. Good luck with that.
Because the scenes that changed out of the black borders were shot in imax.
That was extremely hard to explain.
Because the scenes that changed out of the black borders were shot in imax.
That was extremely hard to explain.
?Secondly, I want you to imagine how this would look cropped to 16x9, let alone 4:3:
What a revealing conversation.I remember my dad, in like 94 or 95, saying the same thing.
"Why the hell would they cut off the picture like that!?"
"They're not cutting off the picture dad. That's what it looked like in the theater."
"There weren't no damn black bars in the theater."
"Well, yeah, there were. I mean, kinda. It's not like"
"It didn't look like this in the theater!"
"We didn't actually see this in the theater."
"Shut up, Boy."
"I'm just... the picture isn't cut-off. There's actually more pic--"
"How you gonna tell me there's MORE PICTURE there? Half the damn screen is blacked out"
"But the guy who made the movie shot it so that"
"What the hell good is it to hide half your movie behind some black bars?"
"But there's nothing BEHIND the bla--"
"Didn't I tell you to shut up? Eject this thing and take it back to the store. Christ sake."
Check out what the Trailer Park Boys movie looks like.
Thank you for ruining a movie, Netflix. Such an amateur mistake taking a widescreen movie and forcing it into 4:3.
[IMGhttp://i6.minus.com/iPrDBS78YjVST.jpg[/IMG]
Yeah it is annoying when they do this, but Prometheus was crap no matter with or without black bars sadly.
What a revealing conversation.
Movies can't be shot in 4:3 and cropped to widescreen. Anyone shooting in widescreen knows that's a lousy compromise because they have to then compose shots in ways that cater to two screen shapes at the same time.My idea was to simply keep all of the information in the shown image intact. That's all it is. And of course you can't adequately frame for all those ratios, that's why a standard was mentioned. Standard in this case means 1 ratio, not dozens. As far as replicating existing movie scenes 1:1, you're right, there is no workable solution other than varying degrees of black bars like we have now. But in this theoretical world where there is 1 standard, my solution would have been better than cutting people out of the scene or squishing them together in that hilariously bad 4:3 image that one guy posted.
No they don't at least not for me. I regularly watch more than one movie a week and I regularly receive big movies day one, and my turnaround is only limited by the mail delivery.
....that was an intentional stylistic decision to mimic the change of black and white to color of the original film. In theaters, the beginning of the film is black and white, 4:3 and not 3D; when you get to Oz the frame expands to widescreen, it's in color and is now 3D. These are storytelling and artistic choices that filmmakers utilize.Then you have movie like Oz the great and powerful. Shot in a 2.5:1 ratio with the beginning of the movie in 4:3. Giving you this small box to watch on a 16:9 aspect ratio television screen. It was over all really annoying to deal with
....that was an intentional stylistic decision to mimic the change of black and white to color of the original film. In theaters, the beginning of the film is black and white, 4:3 and not 3D; when you get to Oz the frame expands to widescreen, it's in color and is now 3D. These are storytelling and artistic choices that filmmakers utilize.
I used to work at Suncoast Video years and years ago during the transition to DVDs. People hate the black bars because they always assumed they were actually cutting off the top and bottom of the screen instead of the reality that they were missing the sides. Luckily we had a company provided picture at the front register showing and example of what they were actually missing with pan and scan so I could just easily point to that. I wonder if people still don't understand it.
Movies can't be shot in 4:3 and cropped to widescreen. Anyone shooting in widescreen knows that's a lousy compromise because they have to then compose shots in ways that cater to two screen shapes at the same time.
Black bars were a stupid thing to complain about when tvs were 4:3 and they're a stupid thing to complain about now. Why did you think anything had changed? It will always be a problem for most people, even though it shouldn't be.
2013? It seems weird to me that people who don't understand that different media sometimes come in different shapes would STILL be the majority, or at least enough of a sizable minority that movie studios would still default to cropping their films before releasing them to cable/netflix.