bud said:
...?
i'm talking about him saying that he'd gladly pay $30-40 (!!!) for just a small portion of the game.
As an alternative to not recieving the game for another year? absolutely.
If they made it free, I'd be happy too. But why make it free if that'll ultimately cut into revenue for the series (if many feel like they've already 'played' GT5, are they going to want to shell out for the full copy? hardcore fans would, but not necessarily more casual fans). If that happens... then what... a reduction in the quality of the series I love?
Ranger X, if you don't feel it's fair to $30-40 pay for prologue, then don't. The precedent has already been set; it's clearly not intended as a product for anyone but hardcore GT fans.
At the same time though, it's more fully featured then many racing games released in the past.
The only reason you'd think it's not worth 30-40 dollars is when you look at the cost relative to the content the full GT provides, as opposed to the worth of the package. But if we start comparing the worth of games relative to the content they provide, we start heading for a VERY slippery slope.
GT games going for thousands of dollars, given the amount of cars they simulate accurately, and how much it would cost for a simulator of similar ability?
Or how about games like Gears of War; the short but sweet genre going for 10 bucks... because that's the cost of a movie ticket right?