SolidSnakex
Member
MidnightRider said:
That guy is playing on standard physics. There's no way that a car would remain that stable on Professional physics with all the swerving that he's doing.
-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
GT5 News - Nurburgring update (pre-E3 edition)
- Thread starter Niks
- Start date
That guy is playing on standard physics. There's no way that a car would remain that stable on Professional physics with all the swerving that he's doing.
Thunderbear
Mawio Gawaxy iz da Wheeson hee pways games
Anyone criticizing GT5's graphics is pretty laughable in my book. But anyway.
Well up until now I'm pretty sure most people assumed that the bumpers and stuff coming loose was going to be reserved for race cars, now that we see it on production cars I don't think we can say anything about what the final damage will be like until the final version is shown. Since chances are anything we assume right now is probably going to be wrong.
SolidSnakex
Member
It wasn't really an assumption though as Kaz said that race cars would receive more damage than production cars. Although it's worth noting that despite all the beating that the FT-86 took, the hood never came up. And that's one thing that does come up on the Impreza. And the engine is modeled under that hood. Which is what he meant about race cars receiving more modeling than production cars.
painful fart
Member
DieH@rd said:
So the cockpit view is full 360 degrees in replay?
Was no aware of that, fucking crazy.
Goldrusher
Member
Might be limited to prototypes though...belvedere said:
Or what is always being referred to as the "road car damage" might actually involve loose bodyparts after all. And the "race car damage" will add the deformation.
seattle6418
Member
I spent 12 hours without GAF, then i come back and see 130 new posts on the GT5 thread.
"good, that means we got some news"
TREE TALK!
At least FT86 damaged saved the day.
"good, that means we got some news"
TREE TALK!
At least FT86 damaged saved the day.
Man that guy who posted earlier in the thread hit the nail on the head and it never really struck me until now. I hate all of those idiots who get to play GT5 who can't drive for shit or don't even care about the game but still get to play it and post videos of their shitty fucking driving.
SolidSnakex
Member
Dibbz said:
So pretty much everyone that's got to play GT5 up to this point.
Elan tedronai
Banned
seattle6418 said:I spent 12 hours without GAF, then i come back and see 130 new posts on the GT5 thread.
"good, that means we got some news"
TREE TALK!
i just think people who whine about trees are probably not interested in the game in the first place. When you disregard all the new features in this game for the sake of friggin trees then it simply raises a red flag. Just whining for the sake of whining.
Like one poster said, Thank Goodness Polyphony had their priorities where it mattered. Damage and night racing instead of trees
Basically yes. PD should release some videos or something that shows of the new driving physics, awesome turns, overtaking etc that we should be getting in these gameplay videos but because people can't fucking drive we don't know shit and have to make assumptions. God only knows what we'd get if these assholes were driving on Pro Physics! :|SolidSnakex said:
You know, even though it really sucks that PD takes forever, watching that video of the driver animating makes you realize WHY they take forever. There is no detail that goes unnoticed by those developers. In some respects, this is a bit of a curse, but when you finally do get the project in your hands, you know it is a quality project.
Except for GT4, what a letdown
Except for GT4, what a letdown
SolidSnakex
Member
Dibbz said:
This vid does a good job of showing off the physics
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1S-uGdSJyEo
A lap around the Nurburgring by one of the best GT players and the physics are even giving him trouble.
Metalmurphy
Member
Y2Kev said:You know, even though it really sucks that PD takes forever, watching that video of the driver animating makes you realize WHY they take forever. There is no detail that goes unnoticed by those developers. In some respects, this is a bit of a curse, but when you finally do get the project in your hands, you know it is a quality project.
Except for GT4, what a letdown
Bah. GT4 is better then 3 in every way. It's only a let down cause GT3 was the most amazing thing ever.
I really wanted online play. But it was still really impressive to have so many cars and such. It just felt kind of like a vanity project. They were not very ambitious in terms of pushing the game offerings forward. But it is good to see they have entirely rewritten their driving model for GT5.DuckRacer said:
Always-honest
Banned
Y2Kev said:
you haven't seen the trees yet, have you?
SolidSnakex
Member
Bad_Boy said:Took way too long for that bumper to come off. He wrecked plenty of times before it came loose. But better to have it than to not I suppose.
It seems like that's one of those things that they're tinkering with. I remember some complaining that parts on the Impreza would come loose too easily.
SolidSnakex
Member
Saiyar said:
Some GT fan site might've done that but Polyphony didn't. Kaz has said that the damage level will be extensive but people shouldn't expect to see the cars completely totaled.
On the subject of cars, Der_Meister just mentioned on GTplanet that Polyphony was at McLaren headquarters today photographing and getting data for the MP4-12C and F1-GTR.
Waiting patiently here but goodness me GOW III and FFXIII have released now, surely within the next month GT5 should get the spotlight. If it is indeed releasing at the end of this year we will get some information about mentioned features such as the head tracking........will be great to see how that works. We pretty much know all that needs to be known about the game, seeing a lot of it in motion would be great though.
SolidSnakex
Member
Yeah, it doesn't necessarily mean that they'll be in GT5. But it's certainly a possibility since they're still modeling and adding new cars. Which is probably why Kaz doesn't want to give a solid number when it comes to the car count.
Every time I see a video of someone showing off the cosmetic damage, I always think its inclusion is a waste of effort. I mean, at first it seemed like the holy grail for GT, but when you see someone drive like so much of a moron that the whole game would be unplayable, for the payoff of the paintwork being a little scratched or a bumper hanging a little bit off, you have to wonder why PD would even bother.
For a more arcadey racer that relies on the spectacle of big crashes, it's damn essential, but for a sim that has you completely out of the race if you have so much as a bad spin, it makes next to no difference. Basically, if you ever have a crash that would noticeably damage your car in this, you'd have already thrown the event away, so I don't see the value in continuing to drive around with a damaged vehicle.
For a more arcadey racer that relies on the spectacle of big crashes, it's damn essential, but for a sim that has you completely out of the race if you have so much as a bad spin, it makes next to no difference. Basically, if you ever have a crash that would noticeably damage your car in this, you'd have already thrown the event away, so I don't see the value in continuing to drive around with a damaged vehicle.
While great for us consumers I have to admit that I'm surprised GT5 is going to have so much content. With the shit that is DLC this generation it's shocking Sony are allowing so much content to be in GT5 instead of selling it as £10 car packs 2 months after release.
It will probably still happen but seriously with the content promised in the retail release the need for DLC seems silly.
It will probably still happen but seriously with the content promised in the retail release the need for DLC seems silly.
I was thinking about DLC the other day. I mean it would be so easy for Kaz to go into the office tomorrow and say "no, we're not going to put all 1000 cars in the game; let's put in 500, and then let's release the other 500 as packs on PSN every month." In this day and age, it's pretty admirable they've chosen not to do that.
Sadly, the damage in itself is very crappy.
I would expect at least their damage to reach the quality of, let's way, last gen's TOCA 2 and TOCA 3. Right now they aren't even near what Codemasters could do like 10 years ago.
oh well, I fear they just put some damage in there just so people can stop saying there's isn't any. It really looks like an afterthought right now. Not even Forza 3 good.
.
I would expect at least their damage to reach the quality of, let's way, last gen's TOCA 2 and TOCA 3. Right now they aren't even near what Codemasters could do like 10 years ago.
oh well, I fear they just put some damage in there just so people can stop saying there's isn't any. It really looks like an afterthought right now. Not even Forza 3 good.
.
SolidSnakex
Member
KingDizzi said:
We probably have the iTunes style GTHD to thank for that. There was a very negative reaction to it and now they seem to be making a point to pack everything they possibly can into GT5. Kaz has made a point in a recent interview that everything they want in the game will be there and that they aren't going to hold anything back to try to sell to us at a later date.
I don't think the developer can choose if the game does or does not get DLC, in this case it seems to be one where Sony gave PD the go ahead to make the game as meaty as possible. If I am wrong and Yamauchi can choose then it's just a case where he takes pride in the games he develops.
Once GT 1 sold 10 million Yamauchi money must have stopped being an issue for him, he must be swimming in his pool full of it as we speak. So as I said his motivation for still making games would be more for enjoyment than anything else.
Wish I was like that but sadly that is not the case, 4 more years to go and I shall be charging £500 for teeth whitening.
Once GT 1 sold 10 million Yamauchi money must have stopped being an issue for him, he must be swimming in his pool full of it as we speak. So as I said his motivation for still making games would be more for enjoyment than anything else.
Wish I was like that but sadly that is not the case, 4 more years to go and I shall be charging £500 for teeth whitening.
SolidSnakex said:Interesting, here's a video of the FT-86 with the bumper nearly falling off and the door jarred loose
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re3z7h3HruU
http://i40.tinypic.com/141v19u.png
http://i43.tinypic.com/4hxe2x.png
http://i42.tinypic.com/2lubfb.png
Credit to Coiler from GTplanet for finding the vid.
Uggh...looks ridiculous. Rather have scratches on this car than this sort of "damage".
SolidSnakex said:
If they had to choose one or the other they should go with deformation with no parts falling off. Like Project Gotham.
Seeing pieces hang off while keeping their perfect shape is way too surreal.
Shao Kahn Brewing a Stew
Banned
I'm not buying GT5. This thread convinced me that trees need Crysis-approval or it's a no buy. Oh and they need to confirm that staring at in-game sun for more than a minute makes you go blind. Also, if they don't show ambulance show up and perform CPR on the driver when you crash the car, I'm selling my PS3.
Shao Kahn Brewing a Stew
Banned
Wario64 said:
Fuck yeah! Oh and there should be an in-game Insurance. If you crash, your insurance would rack up and collection agency would come knocking at your door.
It ain't about driving anymore. It's about LIVING THE LIFE, BITCHES! I NEED MY SIMS IN THIS SO-CALLED SIMULATOR! I've had more fun with The Sims than that piece of shit Prologue! I mean I own a PSEye. My face better be plastered in the fucking game in driver's license like Burnout Paradise! I don't care if they are ripping them off... they've been ripping off Forze, Rock N' Roll Racing, Mario Kart and Halo.. everyone knows that!
Oh and whenever you unlock a car, you better fucking pay brokerage fee and license plate renewal every year! WTF GUERRILLA? FIX DIZ SHIET!! PD JUST SHOT THEMSELVES IN FOOT!
SolidSnakex
Member
KingDizzi said:
I have no doubt that the game will have DLC and Kaz has never denied that the game will eventually get DLC. All he's said is that when it ships it'll be the game that they wanted to ship. Nothing is going to be cut to make a date and later sold to the player. Which will be nice because it will be like getting a game from previous gens when developers had to pack everything they had into the initial release because DLC wasn't an option.