More like 1080p @ 40-60fps.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
GT6 will use addaptive tesselation
- Thread starter Perkel
- Start date
More like 1080p @ 40-60fps.
backbreaker65
Banned
This whole scenario reminds me when EA sports said polygons can't be done on the PS1 for a football game, when Sony 989 studios announced they were using polygons. The speculation began saying it they pull it off, it would be lacking in other areas they would have to sacrifice something. Not only did they not sacrifice anything they added more features. Here we are again same type of announcement with "adaptive Tess" and here come the detractors doubting them. Let's take a wait and see approach for this one.
dragonflys545
Member
Drive club is an arcade racer...
nhlducks35
Member
Yeah, "1080P".
IT is just not 1920x1080the lambo is now premium
Hopefully the Veyron stays standard.
Unknown One
Member
Hopefully there is no standard...for the PS4 version.
the lambo is now premium
Out of all the screenshots this one seems the most "videogame" looking for anything GT6 release so far.The other screens are more believable.
Betta Lines
Member
The lighting in that shot is the same as all the other 'studio' shots. It is also is identical to all GT5 'studio' shots.
So I can only assume you have a problem with the model?
Are you people not bored of this shite?
I think it has something to do with the tires that are making it look less real.
I don't have a problem with this car,this one looks perfectly fine to me.
It can be expensive, but in some cases it can be cheaper than the alternative.
Some ps2 games used tesselation to get good quality surfaces with smaller memory amount. (IE. SSX for ground)
velociraptor
Junior Member
dragonbane
Member
Yeah. Nintendo also used tessellation for the ocean in Wind Waker. Blew my mind reading about it.
What you see is not natural lighting.
A ton of late-generation PSOne titles used 'tesselation'. You remember textures on those games warping/'swimming' when coming close to the screen? That's due to the pseudo 3D nature of the system. Later in the generation the developers made routines for splitting up the polygons into several smaller polygons the closer they got to the screen to prevent texture warping (less noticeable on smaller surfaces).
Evolution_1ne
Banned
Its been explained just like GDDR5 has been explained its dumbass fanboys with their heads shoved up their asses choose to ingore it so they can troll
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WZxx4XTzFI&feature=player_embedded
And there goes MSAA, predictable though.
And there goes MSAA, predictable though.
Yeah doesn't look to hot but:
- Game is 6 month before release. That is the phase when you start to polish things out.
- footage is zoomed in a lot which make it look even worse.
SirIgbyCeaser
Banned
Holy shit those load times are amazingly short! I hope they're not cheating by using SDD's in the preview.
phosphor112
Banned
It's very much Tessellation.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=57765768&postcount=84
Look at the highest LOD. Their photomode before didn't have that much "detail" (smoothness) because they couldn't tessellate it.
It had several. Photomode has proof of this. Open up in track photo mode when a lot of cars are in your relative area (and even a bit farther off). If you pan to the cars near you, their LOD's are higher than the ones farther off. Example. The ones with the absolute garbage dash boards are the ones with lower LODs. You can even see more "edges."
Metalmurphy
Member
It's not much different from GT5 considering there is only 1 car.
I'm not sure if this is a joke on standard cars or not, but pretty sure it had more. You can see simple changes during gameplay when getting closer to cars, (most noticable in the license plates) just a few meters away, and more further away.
Just like self-shadowing went? I'll wait for some direct feed over zoomed offscreen before jumping to conclusions.