Red Ribbon Killer plot, but then I began to justify it as being just as outlandish as Hamsterdam. And I never had a problem with that. Well, not quite.
This is still an underdeveloped thought of mine, but I think The Wire works at its absolute peak when it's serving as a lens looking straight into how the day to day life of a Baltimore --whatever-- is up to. They've got their overarching goals, characters, sure, but it's when it's that brutally honest voyeurism into what could have actually be happening there. But that can only work for so long and eventually, because the show actually has to, you know, progress, some of the characters and the plots become sort of a different beast. Unique and very specific to The Wire as a show. So even something small like having Stringer try to go legitimate was a small mountain I had to overcome because it's as though these characters are stepping out of the concrete positions we realistically understood they were in and they get taken in different places. But after that initial adjustment, it's perfectly fine. Excellent, in fact. It's a bold move to be taking the characters into really interesting, different, thematically compelling places.
And I think the Red Ribbon Killer plot serves that purpose. Sure, it's probably the most outlandish thing in the show, barring maybe Hamsterdam, but once you overcome that initial jolt and just go for the ride, it's a pretty cool idea. And it's probably the most humorous/satirical The Wire gets with its plotting. The point of the show is to communicate how dysfunctional institutions are, and how individuals combat/are defeated by them. Well then, this is a logical, clever place to take the story in. McNulty, trying so desperately and ruthlessly to actually work a case in an utterly broken system, is forced into literally fabricating murders to obtain what he needs. It's such a quirky, funny idea. That the only way to actually have the institutions working the way they're supposed to work is to do a completely illegal, backdoor lie. To trick the police force into working properly. It also ties in nicely to how sensationalist the media has become. That there's very little media attention on the very real, very brutal series of murders from the Stanfield crew. You have to create a silly, dramatic, flashy set of murders for it to get any real attention (and therefore have any real action taken to solve the problem). It's actually pretty damn good I think, just a clear tonal shock to what we know is The Wire.
I think the actual flaw of S5 that brings it down a notch compared to the previous seasons is the Baltimore Sun plot itself. Firstly it's the only season where the new institution is not the primary focus of the season (Except probably S3, but that's fine because the politicians get another two seasons afterwards so they never feel left out). So out of all the focused institutions, I connected with the Sun the least. But it's also this fabrication plot which irks me. Firstly, The Wire is fantastic at giving us specific cases of institutional dysfunction, but always ensuring that this is not a one off thing and that it will continue to happen. Because it's the system that's broken, not because a few individuals are screwing it around along the way. Scott Templeton is, seemingly, a one off tool and giving a raise to this one off tool is by no means the worst thing that's happening to the industry. David Simon tells us this is a real story, but it never feels like it can be generalized to a larger scope. There are always going to be Rawls' and Burrells and Carcettis and we all know people like this, but I'd think that someone like Scott Templeton could have just as easily been fired in a slightly different setting.
And I know David Simon has gone onto explain the "real" meaning of S5 and the news media, and that irks me too. He's explained in a few interviews that the real point was not what was overtly happening with the Templeton plot week in, week out, but instead what the paper is not reporting on every week. What we're not watching. They never report on Prop Joe's death, or the rise of a dangerous kingpin, or drug violence etc and that was supposed to be the primary point. The show doesn't linger on this at all. It just stays there, in the background. Important events take place.. and then they're just not reported on. I find that.. annoying. The Wire is as good as it is and is so obviously amazing to the average viewer because it doesn't try to play tricks with the audience. They have a story to tell, a message to communicate, and they're going to very carefully, very clearly, very ruthlessly tell it to you. It makes no sense to sweep this under the rug and play games with the audience to see who can pick up on it. Do you want that to be the focus of the season? Then put it in the forefront. Give some actual drama to it. Make some of the news characters torn or arguing to have more important news pieces front and center. For there to be a story there, there needs to be a tension between two parties, not just "Oh hey, did you notice that back there. Heh, oh yeah."
Anyway, good season I think overall. Not a large dip in quality by any means. A very good ending to a superb show.