jetpacks was yes
Member
Man, those cases...
GhaleonEB said:Stores are now in the intersting position of supporting four formats, all fighting for shelf space:
VHS
DVD
HD-DVD
Blu-Ray - Coming Soon(TM)
Does anyone think either format will reach the penetration that DVD has? I think as soon as one or the other starts to take off digital distribution will begin to get figured out.
You can pretty much cross out VHS. I really don't see them anymore except in rental stores.GhaleonEB said:Stores are now in the intersting position of supporting four formats, all fighting for shelf space:
VHS
DVD
HD-DVD
Blu-Ray - Coming Soon(TM)
OK, found it:hellfire said:got a link?
Other than the academic curiosity, do you think it really matters? If you are worried you are going to end up with a dead format few years from now, with no movie release either on BR or HDDVD, what other option do you have? Continue buying DVDs in hope they will survive longer? But why limit yourself to an inferior format for the sake of possible longevity that you get nothing out of?GhaleonEB said:Does anyone think either format will reach the penetration that DVD has? I think as soon as one or the other starts to take off digital distribution will begin to get figured out.
DaCocoBrova said:Screw BR. HD-DVD for me and my PC. I'm more concerened about storage than anything movie related.
DJ Sl4m said:42" westing house 480p, 720p, 1080i & 1080p LCD
and two 27" Samsung 480p, 720p, 1080i DLP's
That's some grade-A logic you have there.VictimOfGrief said:pretty clear that HD will win out over Blu-Ray. freaking sony.
I thin he was saying that you are not aware that your Samsung CRT for example, does not show 720p natively, nor does the 1080p (fixed resolution) LCD for that matter.DJ Sl4m said:Westinghouse 42" 1080p LCD HD Monitor
Model: LVM-42w2
Edit: here's my screw up: it's a samsung 26"
Samsung TXN2668WHF - TV - 26"
VictimOfGrief said:pretty clear that HD will win out over Blu-Ray. freaking sony.
VHS > Beta. Sorry to say.Marconelly said:That's some grade-A logic you have there.
VHS had a lot more going for it than HDDVD has at this point (higher capacity, cheaper, more studios and more hardware manufacturers supported it). HDDVD only has the 'cheaper' part of that equation on it's side, and that's until PS3 is released.VictimOfGrief said:VHS > Beta. Sorry to say.
Actually HD has a lot going for it.Marconelly said:VHS had a lot more going for it than HDDVD has at this point (higher capacity, cheaper, more studios and more hardware manufacturers supported it). HDDVD only has the 'cheaper' part of that equation on it's side, and that's until PS3 is released.
VictimOfGrief said:Sony's foul up with Blu-Ray is probably the single most reason I won't get a PS3 because it's a format that while "neat" is just not for the masses.
it's a better alternative for the masses than Blu-Ray is.XMonkey said:And HD-DVD is? :lol
VictimOfGrief said:it's a better alternative for the masses than Blu-Ray is.
XMonkey said:The "masses" are all going to have PS3s before they buy a stand-alone HD-DVD player.
Whose first to market?Kung Fu Jedi said:What has Sony done to mess up BluRay for the masses? Just curious, because this is something I haven't heard before, and most reports I read say that HD-DVD is the one fighting an uphill battle in the market place.
I don't see any value in either format, so this is purely academic curiosity. I have a hard time seeing any scenario where eithe format begins to gain enough market share in the next 2-3 years that there is any impact to the DVD market.Marconelly said:Other than the academic curiosity, do you think it really matters? If you are worried you are going to end up with a dead format few years from now, with no movie release either on BR or HDDVD, what other option do you have? Continue buying DVDs in hope they will survive longer? But why limit yourself to an inferior format for the sake of possible longevity that you get nothing out of?
VictimOfGrief said:Whose first to market?
errr no. However, first to market means they have been in production for at least 6-9 months, also, rev 2 to rev 3 are already planned, designs for different cases are being made... as far as I know the PS3 is the ONLY Blu-Ray player that will be out this year? Unless this isn't true and their will be a choice.Kung Fu Jedi said:And that determines which format wins? Especially with such a short gap betweent he two products, whic have zero recognition at all from the mainstream public?
Dreamcast FTW I suppose!
I have a slight feeling you are just baiting here, but in a remote chance that you are not - that made very little sense. Not only you have more brands to choose with BR (Panasonic, Sony, Pioneer just of those announced so far) but just how BR being in PS3 makes the PS3 less desirable? If you have interest solely in HDDVD for it's support by Universal, I can at least understand that, but in that case, what does that have to do with PS3 in any way. You are obviously not going to use it to watch BR movies, and it's not like it won't play games and your existing DVD collection.VictimOfGrief said:Actually HD has a lot going for it.
Cheaper, available now and it has the distinct advantage of not coming from Sony.
Sony's foul up with Blu-Ray is probably the single most reason I won't get a PS3 because it's a format that while "neat" is just not for the masses.
Well you started the debate by a very inflamatory comment, so are you now saying that you are generally fair in your assessment and that comment was just trolling?You gotta love the debate though, you're either a HD Fanboy or a Blu-Ray fanboy. There is no middle ground on this.
VictimOfGrief said:errr no. However, first to market means they have been in production for at least 6-9 months, also, rev 2 to rev 3 are already planned, designs for different cases are being made... as far as I know the PS3 is the ONLY Blu-Ray player that will be out this year? Unless this isn't true and their will be a choice.
Kung Fu Jedi said:Ummm... Panasonic, Sony, and Samsung have all announced standalone players, with the Samsun model set to be released in June. They do cost more than HD-DVD, and if they do hit in June as expected, the two months difference isn't enough to sway consumers, who have no real knowlege of these products yet. Remember, most don't even have an HDTV to use 'em on.
VictimOfGrief said:Next question.... which sounds more cool?
HD-DVD or Blu-Ray?
I'm guessing Best Buy pushes HD-DVD because it "sounds cool".
Proably won't reach the market penetration that DVD has, and will eventually be replaced by digital downloads in a 6-8 years, maybe even sooner. But everything gets replaced by something else eventually, and if you want to own the movies, and have a HDTV, I see no reason to not buy HDDVD or BR movies - I think most releases will be coming out on them as well as on DVD during their life span, however long it ends up being.GhaleonEB said:I don't see any value in either format, so this is purely academic curiosity. I have a hard time seeing any scenario where eithe format begins to gain enough market share in the next 2-3 years that there is any impact to the DVD market.
If they do, they push it because they can sell it today...VictimOfGrief said:Next question.... which sounds more cool?
HD-DVD or Blu-Ray?
I'm guessing Best Buy pushes HD-DVD because it "sounds cool".
I don't know about Samsung or Sharp, but LG did announce a player that will support both.TerryLee81 said:Didn't Samsung (or Sharp?) announce a player for both formats?
VictimOfGrief said:Next question.... which sounds more cool?
HD-DVD or Blu-Ray?
I'm guessing Best Buy pushes HD-DVD because it "sounds cool".
Warnen said:Morphix(.hacked) and I just got ours, no movies till the AM though.
maybe he will take some picks later
Warnen said:Morphix(.hacked) and I just got ours, no movies till the AM though.
maybe he will take some picks later
empanada said:The important question here is...Which side is the porn industry supporting? :lol
Fine. Getting back to your question, Sony screwed up by not being compatible with HD. If they want their "own" little pet project for DVD's, then fine, but at least make them compatible with the other one. now before you go on and on about "WTF, how would they do that?" Delay Blu-Ray? I mean if the PS3 came with a Blu-Ray drive + HD-DVD out of the box, how attractive will that be?Kung Fu Jedi said:Ok, so when I asked you how Sony screwed up, your response was "First To Market!", then when I provided info on BluRay players coming this year, and in only two months, your next respons is "Which sounds more cool?" :lol Obviously you aren't serious and you're just trolling for kicks.
I'll grant you that HD-DVD will resonate as a name with consumers. BluRay is kind of a stupid name and doesn't really say what it is. But I'm not ready to write off one camp over the other, and as I mentioned earlier, most reports I have read, give the nod to BluRay. You have yet to provide any argument in the opposite direction, or explained how Sony screwed up.
Not so sure these days...Kung Fu Jedi said:This statement holds more truth than you know! :lol
Zaptruder said:Fuck you Victimofyourowngoddamnstupidity. This was a pretty informative thread until you entered with your shit no brains comments, turning it into a fan boy anti-sony rant.
But I digress...
anyone knows what the differences between MP2 and MP4 encoding will be, as far as quality is concerned? Will the quality (and space on the BR) be good enough such that there should be no quality drop from one to the other?
If you use MP4 encoding, but at higher bitrates, won't that look better than equally sized MP2 encodings?
Marconelly said:OK, found it:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=660193
I didn't read the whole thing, but if people in that thread know what they are talking about, doing correct inverse telecine in realtime might not be always that simple and accurate. I know how that process works and have been using it in Aftereffects, but I don't know what problems could occur in realtime.
VictimOfGrief said:Fine. Getting back to your question, Sony screwed up by not being compatible with HD. If they want their "own" little pet project for DVD's, then fine, but at least make them compatible with the other one. now before you go on and on about "WTF, how would they do that?" Delay Blu-Ray? I mean if the PS3 came with a Blu-Ray drive + HD-DVD out of the box, how attractive will that be?
regardless, I think their forcing the conversation of formats due to their own stuborness is a shame.
sportzhead said:Well I believe HD-DVD will do a lot better than most of you think. First, Joe Everyman will see the name, "HD-DVD" and will go cool hi def movies for my new HD TV. Then he will see the price (at the end of the year) wow $250 to $350 not bad. And if he has a 360 and an add on player is available for $150 all the better. Blu-Ray is too "new" sounding to the average person. They will see it in stores along side HD-DVD and see it cost more and has a wired name. Instead of purchasing it right then and there they will probably go home and research it first.
This could all be thrown overboard if Blu-Ray comes down in price by the holiday season, and Disney releases a lot of their kid friendly movies. The PS3 only comes into the equation if it is under $400 and is widely available. Which means don't count on the PS3 to help early Blu-Ray sales.
rc213 said:Pics of the Menus in movies when you get some would be nice to check out.
Ninja Scooter said:can i have $100? just $100 you'll never miss it.