• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Hobbit skeleton found

Status
Not open for further replies.

ManaByte

Member
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050303/ap_on_sc/hobbit_brain_2

Scientists working with powerful imaging computers say the spectacular "Hobbit" fossil recently discovered in Indonesia had distinctive brain features that could justify its classification as a separate — and tiny — human ancestor.

The new report, published Thursday in the online journal Science Express, seems to support the idea of a sophisticated human dwarf species marooned for eons while modern man proliferated.

The new research produced a computer-generated model that compared surface impressions on the inside of the fossil skull with brain casts of modern and ancient humans, as well as chimps and other primates.

The scientists said the model shows that the 3-foot specimen, nicknamed Hobbit, had a brain unlike anything they had seen before in the human lineage. The brain is chimplike in size, about 417 cubic centimeters.

Yet the Hobbit's brain shared wrinkled surface features with the much larger brains of both modern humans and Homo erectus, a tool-making ancestor that lived in southeast Asia more than 1 million years ago. Some of those brain features are consistent with higher cognitive traits.

These brain features coincide with physical evidence of advanced behaviors, such as hunting, firemaking and the use of stone tools, which were found alongside the bones in a cave on the remote equatorial island of Flores. To some, this suggests an organized society of tiny hunters flourished on the island for millennia at a time when modern humans dominated the planet.
 
And you might want to change the title of the post as uh, it was found ages ago, this report just confirms that the fossil is an actual sub-species of human.
 

Do The Mario

Unconfirmed Member
Optimistic said:
And you might want to change the title of the post as uh, it was found ages ago, this report just confirms that the fossil is an actual sub-species of human.

There is much heated debate whether or not this is a diseased normal human or a new sub species; there is a compelling case against the lack of fossil evidence to support a new species.


So while his thread title could be better anyone following the study on these skeletons (parts of skeletons) would know the much awaited report from science only came out yesterday.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom