Review Score doesn't objectively defines the quality of a game, If I want buying guide I'll would see some footage or detailed text. If I want to define its actually quality, the only way is to experience it myself.
People like to argue the objective quality of their beloved game over another game based on numeric score system, or how many Award a game gets. The thing is these are all just perspectives, if the critic perspective truly are the deciding factor over a games objective quality due to them being professional, then what about the game designers themselves or its quality assurance team, aren't they suppose to be more professional then just some writer that never made a video game him/herself, then why does the latter have rights to deny the former? Critic are only professional in their own rule, but their rule itself were never tested and challenged, unlike other fields, in this context there is no evidence to support that their way is superior even to the combine opinion of the players.