• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

I can't get over how bad Metal Gear Solid is

Status
Not open for further replies.
What the...?

T7bZWz2.png


Somebody needs a nap and a Snickers...

The plot thickens, will this end up with people finding out that OP is actually that medic Kojima used?
 
Again, can't we be honest and admit you don't play a MGS game for tight controls and true stealth gameplay?

That's patently false?

MGS 3, 4, and GZ/TPP have shown marked improvements in stealth mechanics with each iteration.

GZ is the best I've ever felt a Metal Gear game control in 3d space.
 
It's not key information unless you're using some definition I'm not aware of. You don't need to hear them to understand what is going on in the game. They fill you in on what happened with Chico and Paz.

You didn't listen to all the tapes, I take it? I think they did a damn good job. We'll have to agree to disagree.

The fact I'm defending it should be evidence enough that it is defensible.
So if the tapes arent important, then you agree that all Paz and Chico are are shock value by themselves with the single tape you have to listen to and the two cutscenes you end up watching? Cause by themselves there's no depth there.

No, I've listened to them.

I don't know, it sound more like evidence that fans tend to like jumping through hoops for their ringmaster.
 
I want it to be treated seriously if it's to be tackled as a subject. It's pretty clearly not given the time or nuance it deserves.


Oh you don't want me to judge the product that they went out and sold. Well, tough shit.

You can judge it all you want, but I don't think you're judging it within the right frame. It is a prologue that is only there to set-up the larger story.
You're asking for more than what the game set out to do. Theres no ambiguity that GZ is a teaser, everyone knew that going in basically. I'm just confused as to why you're asking for more exposition as what serves as nothing more than a chapter 0. If you watch a 30 minute screening of a 2 hour movie, are you going to complain about lack of closure on plot threads? Because thats essentially what you're doing.
Now if MGSV comes out and Paz's story isn't completed or is half-assed then I'll be right there with you throwing tomotoes at Kojima. But as it stands the man released the equivalent of PP's Tanker Chapter or Virtuous Mission.
 
As much as I disagree with the OP, he's not "shitposting". If anything, it's the people going "YOU'RE WRONG!!!" as if that matters. As for the gif you posted, it's like arguing through memes and shit. 4chan behavior.

Speaking of which, looking at that thread, I think they are just mocking NeoGAF. The OP probably has nothing to do with it.
Well him being wrong is OUR opinion so #DEALWITHIT.
Besides most of the points he makes are blatantly dumb and aren't valid in a 16 year old game.
 
Metal Gear has always felt lost in translation. Doesn't keep it from being a good series tho.
 
Don't pretend text isn't tropey as hell too.

Fiction comes in a large variety too. Metal Gear is like Jack Reacher, light action stuff with occasional deep themes. It never claimed to be War & Peace or anything more high brow.

I want it to be treated seriously if it's to be tackled as a subject. It's pretty clearly not given the time or nuance it deserves.


Oh you don't want me to judge the product that they went out and sold. Well, tough shit.

Agreed, a rookie mistake Kojima made. Chico and Paz needed more personality & development otherwise they just look like sacrificial lambs for the player to feel bad.
 
Time to go to sleep

image.php


Doubt it...

OnTopic: While I can understand not liking something popular... nah I'm not even going to try, I dont understand this OP. Like, you need to give tons of examples of games doing all of things right so that we can see how your mind works.
 
She'd be a basic fallen mentor if it wasn't for that final bit of exposition at the end. It completely reframes every scene with The Boss in it. Theres absolutely nothing basic about it.
A final bit of exposition can reframe her actions but it doesn't retroactively make her an interesting character.
 
Well I played the original MGS first time last year and I think it's the best PS1 game of all time.

Old games have always their problems. Is it camera, graphics or controls. In MGS case:

Fixed camera angles have aged better than free moving camera from ps1 era. It also gives very cinematic feel to already very cinematic game.

Graphics are blocky but they still work quite well. I never thought "man, this game is ugly." GUI elements look very stylish even today. I love the codec screen and the character portraits.

Controls are the biggest problem especially when playing the game again after I had played MGS2 and MGS3. But I didn't feel frustrated too many times.

The story, voice acting, soundtrack (doesn't get enough praise) are all very good in my opinion. Okay if this would be a 1999 movie it wouldn't be said to be best one the ever. But as a game story it makes you wanna continue and finish the game.

And there's the great boss battles, and likable cast etc. Just one of the best games ever.
 
ITT: Your favorite game does not stand the test of time, and how to deal with the fact.

Remember when your dad lectured you on how good it was back in the day? Other side of the mirror GAF.
 
Look, man. The problem isn't OP's opinion. Plenty of people don't like Metal Gear Solid. The problem is the hyperbole. "I can't get over how bad Metal Gear Solid is" like, what? Yes, you can. Play another game-- I don't know, maybe something you actually like. Every Metal Gear-related thread is like this. (New MGS5 trailer is out, more than half the posts are about how "shit" MGS4 was, for example. Again, it's not opinions-- it's the hyperbole.) I mean, look at this post from the MGSV:TPP is the final Metal Gear game from Hideo Kojima. How does this make you feel? thread:

He is without doubt the most overrated game developer I've come across, to say the MGS games are nothing special is an understatement, the false praise he receives has contributed to his overindulgence with trailers and what not, he thinks of himself as some kind of storyteller when he is not even close to being half decent. Gameplay also sucks. MGS is only behind the Uncharted franchise with regards to the most overrated franchises which at I have played, those have been two series that get so much buzz that I've played them because every time I feel like I would be missing out on something special but nope, they just end up being mediocre shit.

At least ND showed they had at least some talent with the TLOU, probably my favourite game in the last few years so I'm looking forward to Uncharted 4. But Kojima has not learnt fuck all judging my ground zeroes, he's just awful. I think Kojima would be happier making films rather than games, couldn't really care less about what he does next but I do think film making would suit him better.

Imagine if Sn4ke_911 went into an Neil Druckmann thread and said something favorable regarding MGS. Pretty safe to say that he wouldn't be greeted with "Oh, no, Uncharted fans are coming..." Now, be a part of that fanbase who has to tolerate the constant barrage of cheapshots and misinformation spread - even by mods - and tell me why people shouldn't be calling OP out.
 

Completely ignoring that I said I liked it. I don't think he is as brilliant as his rabid fans say he is.

so: philip k dick - hack, or genius? because sometimes a creator's richness of ideas, concepts, insights, & observations can transcend their deficiencies in the more traditional creative skills...

This is something I can get behind. It's an interesting thing to think about. I don't think this is 100% the case, but it's something for me to consider.
 
Fiction comes in a large variety too. Metal Gear is like Jack Reacher, light action stuff with occasional deep themes. It never claimed to be War & Peace or anything more high brow.



Agreed, a rookie mistake Kojima made. Chico and Paz needed more personality & development otherwise they just look like sacrificial lambs for the player to feel bad.

Can you tell me where you bought the game already or where you have played it? Because I also can't wait until September 1st...

Wait... Or are you just making stuff up and didn't play the final game yet? But... nah no way that can be true.
 
Look, man. The problem isn't OP's opinion. Plenty of people don't like Metal Gear Solid. The problem is the hyperbole. "I can't get over how bad Metal Gear Solid is" like, what? Yes, you can. Play another game-- I don't know, maybe something you actually like. Every Metal Gear-related thread is like this. (New MGS5 trailer is out, more than half the posts are about how "shit" MGS4 was, for example. Again, it's not opinions-- it's the hyperbole.) I mean, look at this post from the MGSV:TPP is the final Metal Gear game from Hideo Kojima. How does this make you feel? thread:



Imagine if Sn4ke_911 went into an Neil Druckmann thread and said something favorable regarding MGS. Pretty safe to say that he wouldn't be greeted with "Oh, no, Uncharted fans are coming..." Now, be a part of that fanbase who has to tolerate the constant barrage of cheapshots and misinformation spread - even by mods - and tell me why people shouldn't be calling OP out.

TiredSecondaryIceblueredtopzebra.gif
 
A final bit of exposition can reframe her actions but it doesn't retroactively make her an interesting character.

The final plot twist retroactively changes who she is in the narrative of MGS3. You might not like her, but retroactively her role was completely reversed, and that reversal elevated her to a whole new level in my eyes.
 
Whenever I read OP's replies, it's like reading something written by someone that doesn't like Goldeneye in N64 because it doesn't have regenerating shields and he can't press 'A' to pay respects.

Seriously, the comparison with Blacklist which is the casual distilled entry compared to Chaos Theory settled it. Especially since the OP HASN'T PLAYED FUCKING CHAOS THEORY.

Stop going back to old games OP. They are too hard for you to understand. And no, you're not old. You're casual.
 
Man the OP just got crapped on during that first page. Not every game is for everybody. I'm not a fan of Metal Gear at all, and unlike the OP, I did play it at the time of its release. I found just about every aspect to either difficult to deal with (the controls, for example) or just unenjoyable (the stealth, the story). Like those who can't seem to understand why someone wouldn't like it, my feelings make it hard for me to reconcile that so many people do. It's disappointing because there are so many elements that sounded cool that I wanted to experience for myself, but it just didn't click for me in the slightest. Specifically the first game, mind you. I didn't dabble in the series after that.
 
A final bit of exposition can reframe her actions but it doesn't retroactively make her an interesting character.

It does actually. She rationalized her actions for defecting before her last breath and thus gave BB the motivation to question what his role is as an agent of the US Government.

She created the Big Boss that the fans now know.
 
So if the tapes arent important, then you agree that all Paz and Chico are are shock value by themselves with the single tape you have to listen to and the two cutscenes you end up watching? Cause by themselves there's no depth there.

No, I don't agree and that wasn't what I was saying. Not listening to the tapes does not inhibit one from understanding what is actually happening as you play, which is what I understand is key narrative information:

Snake infiltrates a base, rescues two prisoners, return to homebase to find it under attack, Snake rescues his friend and escapes, one of the prisoners has a bomb inside them and Snake removes it, turns out there is another and the helicopter explodes.

Something like that. If one of those were removed, we probably wouldn't understand what was going on. That is my understanding of Key Narrative Information. What your talking about is character building which is kept to radio conversations, overheard chatter and tapes.

I don't know, it sound more like evidence that fans tend to like jumping through hoops for their ringmaster.

Ah, insults. Cool. We're done then, I take it?
 
Look, man. The problem isn't OP's opinion. Plenty of people don't like Metal Gear Solid. The problem is the hyperbole. "I can't get over how bad Metal Gear Solid is" like, what? Yes, you can. Play another game-- I don't know, maybe something you actually like. Every Metal Gear-related thread is like this. (New MGS5 trailer is out, more than half the posts are about how "shit" MGS4 was, for example. Again, it's not opinions-- it's the hyperbole.) I mean, look at this post from the MGSV:TPP is the final Metal Gear game from Hideo Kojima. How does this make you feel? thread:



Imagine if Sn4ke_911 went into an Neil Druckmann thread and said something favorable regarding MGS. Pretty safe to say that he wouldn't be greeted with "Oh, no, Uncharted fans are coming..." Now, be a part of that fanbase who has to tolerate the constant barrage of cheapshots and misinformation spread - even by mods - and tell me why people shouldn't be calling OP out.

MEnvU7u.gif
 
I don't know, man. Sure its aged a bit, but I think MGS is pretty damn fantastic. I'm not a fan of cutscene-heavy games by any stretch, but I give it a pass because it was something different from everything else when I played it at release and now it can ride that wave of nostalgia.
 
Well bruh... You could have not bought it. You could have waited for a sale. You coulda consumed it in the myriad of different ways the internet allows one to consume media nowadays. I don't know what to tell you there.

reggie_not_my_prbds1.jpg
Yeah Ground Zeroes was a perfect $5 appetizer for TPP. Any gaffer who shelled out more than $15 despite all the reviews we had doesn't deserve to complain, it's entirely on them :P
 
MGS1 is nearly the perfect game IMO.

I can think back, however, to the first time I played it which was either a demo or a loaned copy, and just being completely horrible at it. I died so many times in just the first room or the snowy area afterwards. Eventually though, it clicked somehow and I can go play those sections blindfolded. So I can see how new players may not get it.
 
I wish folks would give themselves time to play MG 1&2 (MSX). Just amazing games as well and stop starting with MGS1....you also shot yourself in the foot expressing point no.4 yet you begin your journey into MG with MGS1 lol...I'm going to assume OP meant to post this topic on April 1st...
 
I'll concede MGS as a series is probably overrated, but the games are solid (bad pun), and I can see why the series gets so much praise. MGS1 was pretty epic for its time, the controls aren't that bad at all.

Also calling Snake one of the worst character designs ever? I get that people have outlying opinions but cmon man. Id really love to hear what your top 5 characters are then...
 
Can you tell me where you bought the game already or where you have played it? Because I also can't wait until September 1st...

Wait... Or are you just making stuff up and didn't play the final game yet? But... nah no way that can be true.

I was talking about their portrayals in Peace Walker & Ground Zeroes. Chico never shuts up about monsters and Paz's face heel turn comes from almost nowhere but perhaps that was the point, she was that good at lying. The game could have used some Mass Effect style face to face interaction. In Ground Zeroes they are (understandably) reduced to emotional and physical wrecks, hence we don't really get a re-introduction.
 
1. Stealth - It was 1998
2. The controls - It was 1998
3. The dialogue - Fun as hell
4. The story - Totally rad
5. Solid Snake - Bad ass
 
Dude, I'm not the one making fun of it. Surely you saw the post I quoted?

Sorry. I didn't see the GIF in the quote of what you quoted. I thought the response you were quoting was in reference to something else. So that's a my bad, I should have went a link further in the chain.
 
Well bruh... You could have not bought it. You could have waited for a sale. You coulda consumed it in the myriad of different ways the internet allows one to consume media nowadays. I don't know what to tell you there.
I don't really think me waiting for a sale or watching it on YouTube is really going to change the fact that this was a product that was sold
 
MGS1 is old but the franchise matures greatly. You need to take each game as a fragment of the time it was made in. Making a snap judgement about a lengthy, successful franchise based on the first game (which wasn't even the peak) is bound to lead to disappointment.
 
splinter cell blackdicks is the epitome of stealth gameplay

assault_stealth22xk8f.gif


I like Splinter Cell Blacklist but come on bruh, even Spelunky is a better stealth game than that.

I haven't played this game, but why is this constantly brought up? Does the game limit your stealth options? If it doesn't, why does it get flak for giving you the going Rambo options?
 
Ground Zeroes is stupid.

attachment.php


In many ways Ground Zeroes is
the best game in the series so far, with the only contender going to be TPP

Is the part where her rape is recorded on various audio tapes and scattered around an open landscape for your player character to find and collect an optional side mission?

a) this is 100% a different game with no rape at all

b) that's not how it happens or how the collectible cassette tapes work
 
Its not very usual to see posts that besides stating many points I just disagree 100% with every single one of them! Thats one of these unusual moments.
 
I do think the stealth in the first two Solid games is pretty lackluster and agree that Blacklist and Dishonored does it way better. The Blacklist gifs people post are so dumb and misinformed.

However, Ground Zeroes stealth is way way better than Blacklist and about on par with the original Thief trilogy, in my opinion. I've only played MGS1, MGS2, and Ground Zeroes though, so I have no opinion on the other Metal Gear games.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom