Viola of the Abyss
Member
They're pretty much a tie for me but T2 wins because Guns 'n Roses!!!!!
EDIT: Spoilers in the video and comments
EDIT: Spoilers in the video and comments
I see what you mean but i think he was more than just "fine" yknow? I mean, at least according to what we're shown in the film, John Conner is this kid whose mom survived a robot trying to kill her. He loved her and believed in her but then shes taken from him and told that she's this crazy person and a liar. Why wouldn't he be a petulant brat? His life was a lie.I think Furlong was fine. A lot of it comes from the writing too, asking too much of him and making him this audacious child on page that they had to realize could turn into annoying kid on screen. I thought Furlong sold it all about as well as you can expect a child actor to and is really not that bad. Just in comparison with Michael Biehn, he falls short some.
Watched Jurassic Park this week. It's a lot bigger culprit than T2 with the self aware written lines, shallow characters. T2 did a ton more right, and still both aren't to blame for the modern summer blockbuster. Look at the turn of the century films.
My favourite shot is after Sarah knocks the bottle and she bends down and the camera focuses on the dancers including one particular gorgous woman in a Green dress while Arnold crosses the screen in the background like a viscious shark looking for its prey. That shot, the slow motion effect and the swelling of Burnin in the Third Degree makes that an unforgettable shot.
You are right of course T2 and Jurassic park aren't to blame. but neither are the turn of the century blockbusters.
Ultimately it was Jaws that started this.
Don't get me wrong Jaws was an incredible film, and though I think T2 is a bad sequel to Terminator I don't think it is a bad movie. However the summer event film became a tentpole in the movie business. the past few decades has been about refining the formula for the industries money making films.
It is simply easier to see this process through the serialization of successful ( sometimes not so successful) movies, like Terminator, Jaws, Die Hard, Jurassic Park and many others.
Terminator had a tone, a singular special feeling. T2 delivered something very different, and in the process reduced the impact of the first. Arnold's Terminator across all films is less intimidating because of what they did to it in T2.
Summer blockbusters have become action set pieces with exposition bridges. Terminator rose above that with it's mood and story building, T2 in my opinion didn't.
Many great stories, and some of my favorite films came during this process. Lots of them also ended up with franchises that drove those ideas and stories steadily into the ground.
So when I say T2 stands for everything wrong with the summer blockbuster bullshit that is what I mean.
edit: Of course you have to remember what it was like to see terminator before T2 existed to realize how much was lost in the first film by making the second.
In terms of athmosphere and suspense T1 craps all over T2.It has that low-budget gritty feel and look which suits it incredibly well. And Arnie works much better as a bad guy.
Also, the future scenes in T1, especially the one where the terminator infiltrates and shoots up the rebel base, are simply incredibly and hold up well. You really do get the feeling here that humanity is almost done for with the last survivors living in squallor in makeshift bases in undergound sewers and under constant threat of being wiped out by a much superior force.. It somewhow felt really believable.
If T4 had been done in this 'humanity-on-the-brink' style instead of glorified hollywood style it would have been a 100X better movie.
The unknown future rolls toward us. I face it, for the first time, with a sense of hope. Because if a machine, a Terminator, can learn the value of human life, maybe we can too.
T2 is the whole package.
T1 is necessary for you understand why Sarah is so fearful of the terminator but that's it. I think I saw 2 first when I was a kid and then 1 later and was none the worse for it. It works actually, treating 1 like a prequel instead of the first iteration.
I disagree with your opinion.
Nothing in T1 compared to this.
![]()
Bullshit. That's barely even noticable. In fact in all the times I've watched the movie I never noticed anything wrong with that. That part goes by pretty fast and quite frankly even that gif where I'm seeing it over and over again it's not that noticable. Do not even try to compare that with how bad some shit looked in T1. Don't even try. You're reaching.
Actually, check out the deleted scenes from T1. There is indeed a side mission to blow-up Cyberdyne. It's what the home-made bombs are for and in another deleted scene after Reese is put in the body bag and Sarah is put in an ambulance, the building is shown to be Cyberdyne and one of the owners tells a lackey to take the CPU to it's lab/R&D section.
![]()
mindblown.gif
I always wondered why they built those pipebombs. Why not rob a gunshop instead? It's not like they weren't pursuing Reese after the police slaughter anyways, but pipebombs against the Terminator? Well, okay then, guy from the future, I'll follow your lead.
Terminator 1 is the better film.
Terminator 1 is story driven.
Terminator 2 is special effects driven.
Congratulations on preferring the superior of the two.
Terminator 2 is just as story driven as T1...
Did you know that Arnie actually financed the whole scene!? The thing was planed but the Studios didn't want to pay for it. But Arnie said "We really NEED this scene" and so he paid for it![]()
Funny thing is I've seen both numerous times over the years, but it was only watching them back-to-back that the differences really stood out to me. Weird, because I'm usually pretty sensitive towards tonal differences in a narrative and themes, and the differences between Alien/Aliens were immediately obvious and I've always preferred the first. The significantly cheesier script of T2 didn't jump out to me until I had T1 right before it.
Bullshit. That's barely even noticable. In fact in all the times I've watched the movie I never noticed anything wrong with that. That part goes by pretty fast and quite frankly even that gif where I'm seeing it over and over again it's not that noticable. Do not even try to compare that with how bad some shit looked in T1. Don't even try. You're reaching.
It's in the Director's Cut, automatically making it that much worse.I like how you chose a scene that was cut from the movie.
It's in the Director's Cut, automatically making it that much worse.
Really? That's odd, because the building they were in didn't look anything like a high-tech computer company (even for the 80's) it looked more like a heavy industrial manufacturing plant. Why would a computer chip company have a giant hydraulic press?
T2's biggest crime is that it's one of the softer Rs in history and probably would be rated PG-13 today.
.
How could you not have noticed that the first time you saw it? It looks like clothes stuffed with rags.
BTW the stuff you are complaining about in T1 was actually cutting edge for it's time. While the scene in the gif and the green screen behind the car just after this would have looked dated even 20 years before T2.
In terms of violence and gore its a very soft R but Linda Hamilton drops enough F bombs in the movie to ensure even today it would likely get an R. But it certainly does lack the raw brutality of the original.
Stop motion was not cutting edge in 1984
Heh, I remember this. "They were going to cut it due to budget, so I just gave them the money to do it anyway"
You are right of course T2 and Jurassic park aren't to blame. but neither are the turn of the century blockbusters.
Ultimately it was Jaws that started this.
Don't get me wrong Jaws was an incredible film, and though I think T2 is a bad sequel to Terminator I don't think it is a bad movie. However the summer event film became a tentpole in the movie business. the past few decades has been about refining the formula for the industries money making films.
It is simply easier to see this process through the serialization of successful ( sometimes not so successful) movies, like Terminator, Jaws, Die Hard, Jurassic Park and many others.
Terminator had a tone, a singular special feeling. T2 delivered something very different, and in the process reduced the impact of the first. Arnold's Terminator across all films is less intimidating because of what they did to it in T2.
Summer blockbusters have become action set pieces with exposition bridges. Terminator rose above that with it's mood and story building, T2 in my opinion didn't.
Many great stories, and some of my favorite films came during this process. Lots of them also ended up with franchises that drove those ideas and stories steadily into the ground.
So when I say T2 stands for everything wrong with the summer blockbuster bullshit that is what I mean.
edit: Of course you have to remember what it was like to see terminator before T2 existed to realize how much was lost in the first film by making the second.
I need to see the movie again to see if it plays out that way but is any of that true for john? He's a delinquent, he was running aeay from the cop, he hates his foster parents and, at that point, hated his mother too.T-800 is never shown running, but the T-1000 chased the car on foot in the parking garage (I remember the actor had to pull off that scene without looking like he was breathing heavily from the text commentary)
They do act differently. I think it's to show that to infiltrate human camps and imitate them, they do gain a bit of humanity. When they're in robot form, they're cold, calculated, and patient.
You can even see the progress in the T-1000, although I'm not sure it was intentional on Cameron's part. T1000's kills become less brutal the more people he acquires. To the point that by the time he takes over the helicopter, he gives the pilot a chance to live, and by the end of the movie, he doesn't kill Sarah Connor even though he had her dead to rights (if you believe his words). The only thing left of his robot side is his directive to kill John. He's losing control of his robot side, melding with everything he touches.
Also, another neat tidbit about T2: T-1000 assimilates people that John would have normally viewed as his protectors in society. A foster mom, a security guard, a cop, and finally his actual mom. The robot sent to save him is a biker, an outlaw, a rogue, someone who normally would be viewed as a danger to John. The movie is actually set up to play with this idea in the mall, where John is between the 800 and the 1000 and seems he thinks the 800 is going to kill him and the cop will save him. It probably would have more impact if the movie had been advertised with the 800's role being more vague, but it's there.