MrPliskin said:FML. Kill yoursel already you broken record! We're seriously tired of the same song and dance. Move on with your life already.
Ploid 3.0 said:So I finally got around to playing Ratchet and Clank Future: A Crack In Time and it's an awesome semi rpg. Make a dedicated RPG Insomniac, you can do it.
AniHawk said:Insomniac's been making games for Sony exclusively for a long time now. If Sony is suddenly not letting them do what they want to do to flex their creativity (like in the Activision/IW relationship), then IG should go ahead and do something else. I'm kinda pissed at UbiSoft for dragging their feet when it comes to letting Michel Ancel creating the type of game he wants to make, and making his studio work on movie-games and minigame collections instead.
OldJadedGamer said:You're missing the whole point. An experienced dev team will be making the games in tandem so both versions are lead from the ground up. Games you are pointing to started their development years ago when the PS3 didn't have good tools. Now that Sony is up to speed it's a different story. You are living in the past.
Again, there will be only one single reason Insomniac would go true third party and that is to enjoy more sales. If you want to stick your head in the sand and say that sales don't matter at all then I have nothing to discuss with you.
MrPliskin said:FML. Kill yoursel already you broken record! We're seriously tired of the same song and dance. Move on with your life already.
SolidsnackooFoxhound said:You kill yourself. Don't talk to my favorite poster like that. Thanks.
Kenak said:If it's a platformer it's interesting. If it's more FPS from them, not interested at all.
JaseC said:I really hope a new IP wouldn't simply be a Resistance or Ratchet re-skin.
I know some people would probably disagree, but I don't really consider Ratchet a true platformer as much as a jack-of-all-trades. \shrugJaseC said:I really hope a new IP wouldn't simply be a Resistance or Ratchet re-skin.
Kenak said:I know some people would probably disagree, but I don't really consider Ratchet a true platformer as much as a jack-of-all-trades. \shrug
AniHawk said:If Sony is suddenly not letting them do what they want to do to flex their creativity (like in the Activision/IW relationship), then IG should go ahead and do something else.
Truespeed said:You're saying that the R&C series have been behind technologically? No way. There is nothing out there that comes close to R&C in its genre. You may have a point with Resistance 2, but R1 was a great launch game.
Don't you think other platform holders would be thrilled to pay them with good will too? Not sure, if it's really such a big gamble.BeeDog said:If this becomes reality, I would be extremely curious about the reasons for going multiplatform. As an example, Bungie has had a shorter relationship with MS, but you won't see them going MP any time soon, if at all. Insomniac, on the other hand, has worked with Sony for God knows how long, and I'd assume that would build up a lot of goodwill, trust, you name it. For them to go MP, I'd assume some hardcore behind-the-scenes politics would be the cause, and not just the "we wanna reach more gamers" stance.
ChryZ said:Don't you think other platform holders would be thrilled to pay them with good will too? Not sure, if it's really such a big gamble.
J-Rzez said:It would be a shame to see them go mp. This has diluted so much of gaming this gen already. I wish everyone would pick a machine and focus on it. Not worrying about compromises here and there, or being afraid to push the tech in one because you can while you couldn't with the other.
I have my PS3, 360, and gaming rig for exclusives usually. MP games may get a gamefly usually. I want my games to have maximum effort into them that they can. Quit dumbing down the games already. I'd hate to see how something like Uncharted 2 would've ended up if it were mp for example.
"More people get to experience it!", and I may have thought that at one time or another, but after seeing this gen especially what becomes of it I came to this conclusion: Fuck that noise. I want to get my money's worth out of a machine. Don't dumb down my games bro.
Anyways, I want to see Insomniac make a "Diablo-esque" game personally. I don't know why, but I think they could do a killer one for some reason.
Sand meet VaginaMrPliskin said:FML. Kill yoursel already you broken record! We're seriously tired of the same song and dance. Move on with your life already.
BeeDog said:If this becomes reality, I would be extremely curious about the reasons for going multiplatform. As an example, Bungie has had a shorter relationship with MS, but you won't see them going MP any time soon, if at all. Insomniac, on the other hand, has worked with Sony for God knows how long, and I'd assume that would build up a lot of goodwill, trust, you name it. For them to go MP, I'd assume some hardcore behind-the-scenes politics would be the cause, and not just the "we wanna reach more gamers" stance.
MrPliskin said:FML. Kill yoursel already you broken record! We're seriously tired of the same song and dance. Move on with your life already.
This was the closest we got to an answer.Shurs said:The difference is that Bungie was owned by Microsoft while Insomniac Games is merely a partner of Sony's. It wouldn't surprise me if Bungie had to make certain concessions to Microsoft in order to gain their freedom.
The two games were Halo 3: ODST and Halo: Reach presumably.Wired said:WN: One of the details that was going around before the official announcement was that Microsoft was going to have right of first refusal on the games Bungie was making or is it the case that Microsoft Game Studios is the publisher from here on out?
FO: Microsoft Game Studios is our publisher for two projects that weve announced, and beyond that I cant talk about the details of the deal, because we are a privately held LLC, but on the other hand Microsoft is a publicly held company, so they might be able to talk about those details in more depth than we can.
Read More http://www.wired.com/gamelife/2007/10/interview-bungi/#ixzz0i2hvMON3
J-Rzez said:It would be a shame to see them go mp. This has diluted so much of gaming this gen already. I wish everyone would pick a machine and focus on it. Not worrying about compromises here and there, or being afraid to push the tech in one because you can while you couldn't with the other.
I have my PS3, 360, and gaming rig for exclusives usually. MP games may get a gamefly usually. I want my games to have maximum effort into them that they can. Quit dumbing down the games already. I'd hate to see how something like Uncharted 2 would've ended up if it were mp for example.
"More people get to experience it!", and I may have thought that at one time or another, but after seeing this gen especially what becomes of it I came to this conclusion: Fuck that noise. I want to get my money's worth out of a machine. Don't dumb down my games bro.
The love will return as soon as the rumor is debunked. :lolWickedLaharl said:damn didn't realize so many ps3 owners hated insomniac until this thread.
Unless you hate gaming, please don't ever group these two together again.Kittonwy said:Dark Void and Brutal Legend
ChryZ said:Don't you think other platform holders would be thrilled to pay them with good will too? Not sure, if it's really such a big gamble.
Jigsaw said:if they betray sony i will never buy a game from them
Afrikan said:
Kittonwy said:Of course sales matter, the problem is that you're also spending more, and having more people means your overhead is also going to increase, the key is to have enough sales to justify the increase in overhead. It's easy to look at the successes like Ass Creed or Modern Warfare and forget games like Dark Void and Brutal Legend that don't do as well.
Chrange said:The love will return as soon as the rumor is debunked. :lol
00011000 said:Thing is, IG have always been exclusive to Playstation whereas Bungie were Multiplat before being bought by MS so it wouldn't be as odd.
I just don't feel IG have lived up to their promise at all and haven't really provided us PS3 owners anything really groundbreaking. I understand there are passionate fans of their games, but their games simply aren't good enough to be considered tentpole titles and really demand an unfair-share of attention from Sony at the expense of other 1st party titles. (Killzone 2)
I'd prefer Sony nurture another studio to fill the exclusive void left vacant by the possible IG defection to multi-plat-dom. Preferably a studio that can produce innovative, polished titles. (Media Molecule and Quantic Dream come to mind)
Nothing to see hereShurs said:The difference is that Bungie was owned by Microsoft while Insomniac Games is merely a partner of Sony's. It wouldn't surprise me if Bungie had to make certain concessions to Microsoft in order to gain their freedom.