• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

I'm becoming disenchanted with the larger internet gaming community

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ok.

The person seems genuinely clueless/misinformed/ignorant. Maybe providing the correct information instead of trying to get them banned would be a better approach.

Another ugly side of the gaming community. Everyone seems to be out for blood these days.

not even close to being a gaming-exclusive problem
 
Well if you let petty non video game related drama bother you I see why

Video game discussion has just gone so far off from discussing actual video games and is just rumor mongering and controversy now.

You should start thinking about why you game. Pick up a great game and get lost in it. I suggest Resident Evil 6
 

kennyamr

Member
People will be people.
We won't change.
There are all kinds of us.
If you don't like certain people, well... get away from those.
Unfollow, Unfriend, Unthread?
Whatever you want, you are free to join and leave groups as you wish.
Every community has good and bad people, that's how society works.
Too many points of view and too many ways to think.
There is no point in telling some people to stop because they won't.
Just leave them be and join a different group that is more aligned with you.
If laws or rules allow it, your group will be able to lead if the majority agrees.

tl'dr: Pointless thread.
 

Puppen

Banned
You can't have a hobby and expect everyone to be nice and agree with you. You shouldn't impose the "guilt by association" on yourself because of them.

The majority of the online gaming community is vile, though. Even a not-insignificant percentage of GAF, SomethingAwful, and Penny Arcade (3 forums off the top of my head I can think of as generally having a good reputation) believe in GG shit. And then the dozens of other forums out there are full of it or an equally fucked up attitude. I don't think you can say the same for film communities or other groups.

When it seems like the majority of people playing the same hobby as you are just awful fuckers, I completely understand being resentful of the hobby.
 
The Op asked if I was able to separate myself from these people, and yes I am.
I don't know what you want me to do. Get disenchanted with the whole gaming community because of a vocal minority? I'm not going to do it, i think that would be stupid

But do you not think that this minority is a problem? I should hope that we're all able to separate ourselves from them. But just turning a blind eye to the fact that this stuff is going on and is having actual effects on actual, fellow members of the community, is what allows this kind of thing to keep happening.
 

stufte

Member
Ok.

The person seems genuinely clueless/misinformed/ignorant. Maybe providing the correct information instead of trying to get them banned would be a better approach.

Another ugly side of the gaming community. Everyone seems to be out for blood these days.

Yep.
 
Well if you let petty non video game related drama bother you I see why

Video game discussion has just gone so far off from discussing actual video games and is just rumor mongering and controversy now.

You should start thinking about why you game. Pick up a great game and get lost in it. I suggest Resident Evil 6


Nothing to see here, folks! Just some petty drama and rumour mongering.
 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
I'm kind of torn here. If this is not open to discussion at all, then please just let me know and I'll edit it out, but I'm not comfortable with this really stark crackdown about any commentary on the latest speculation about Rapp's moonlighting profession. The air in this thread is kind of off-putting, honestly.

In some of the previous threads, when no evidence was available, plenty of people posted about hypothetical situations in which it would have been perfectly reasonable for Nintendo to terminate her employment.

If we're not allowed to speculate at all, despite this all being a very public incident, then that's fine, but shouldn't it go both ways? People can say Nintendo was terrible and out of line with the termination (and timing-wise, I agree), but if they are going to do that then context is important, isn't it? If we're all going to agree to just shut up and stop talking about the issue because we should respect Rapp's privacy (a sentiment I agree with), then I don't think anyone should be commenting on whether or not Nintendo made a bad decision in firing her.

What business does whatever she was doing (and I'm not even saying that's what it was) have to do with you. Are you trying to shame her?

It's no one's business, but if the claim is true, and it had been pretty public at the time of her firing, I imagine the reaction would have been a hell of a lot different. I think it's relevant as long as the discussion is taking place at all. In respect of Alison, simply not talking about it at all would be appropriate, but any discussion about the righteousness of Nintendo's actions must also not be allowed in that case. That's how I see it, anyway.
 

Cybit

FGC Waterboy
Someone smarter than me really needs to do a long-term study about this. Does gaming attract the type of people that act this way, or does gaming turn people this way? I honestly don't know of any other community that is as consistently vile as gaming.

As someone who frequents hip-hop / music boards, and more importantly, sports boards, Gaming is waaaaaaaay the hell better. Political boards used to be much worse prior to everyone sort of going to their own little circlejerks for the most part (myself included). Gamers tend to be pretty normal all things considered when you look at the whole rather than the outliers who get news / controversy.

(Seriously, gamers can't even fathom how crazy sports fans get)
 
I'm kind of torn here. If this is not open to discussion at all, then please just let me know and I'll edit it out, but I'm not comfortable with this really stark crackdown about any commentary on the latest speculation about Rapp's moonlighting profession.

IT ISN'T OUR POSITION TO JUDGE.

Christ how easy is it to follow this line of thinking?
 
i feel like it's worsening/accelerating because of 2 factors i'm observing:

1. a lot of the angry mobs are actually getting results, and likely make others feel that joining/leading an online mob isn't a fruitless endeavor because there's evidence that it works.

2. as far as gaming specifically, the culture is becoming ever so slowly more and more cozy with the masses**, which could make a lot of people feel like they need to push toward changes they think need to happen to appeal to the masses. ie: as gaming becomes more accepted in mainstream society suddenly political correctness is becoming even more of a hot button topic since it's no longer a (mostly) boys club of a specific age range.

**as in, conan and fallon doing these video game segments all the time, celebrities that are old enough to have likely grown up playing them being open about being gamers, mobile gaming and other super-accessible means of gaming like the Wii suddenly opening up the market to a whole new demographic and making it seem less intimidating. all of these things i think factor into it becoming more of a mainstream industry rather than a niche hobby of the olden days.
 

the1npc

Member
What business does whatever she was doing (and I'm not even saying that's what it was) have to do with you. Are you trying to shame her?



What do you mean by "drama". This is real stuff that affects real people.

Drama does not mean I dont think its real...im saying I come to GAF for game news, the community, the Off topic, etc. Threads about Gamer Gate or gaming jornalism / pr personalities are not interesting to me.
 

draetenth

Member
TBH, I always was disenchanted with the gaming community. The heavy moderation of GAF is one reason why I come here, but this site isn't without it's flaws and some threads can get... difficult before mods can take care of it (part of the problem seems to be that people forget the mods can't be everywhere and you sometimes have to tell them about the thread...).
 
It's disheartening, definitely. I've been in the Overwatch beta for a while and I started toying with the idea of taking the game a little more 'seriously,' maybe keeping up to date with threads and such about its development, but then the reaction to Butt-gate hit and I went "well then, this is a community that I have extremely little desire to engage with." And the Rapp situation, and the tidal wave of gamergate bullshit over the last couple years...

Like, I'm not even comfortable saying that I'm disheartened about this, since I'm acutely aware that I haven't been on the receiving end of it and it feels pretty stupid to say "aw man I feel sad about my dumb hobby" when people are out there having their lives torn apart.

What's even more disheartening is the "just ignore it" response. Like, I get the urge to just try to block it out, but that's what allows this garbage to continue.
 

Gold_Loot

Member
(usually white) people, amirite? And this is an example of why I personally am disenchanted with the gaming community. Everyone seems so wrapped up in identity politics that games can't even be fun for them anymore. People only want to talk about how progressive they are and how they won't play a game/support a studio/etc. unless they fit the current popular political ideology.
I was going to say pretty much the same thing, but you hit the nail on the head.

People pulling the race card, screaming bigotry, and gender shaming. Jesus people, give it a rest..

I mean, there's nothing wrong with discussing these problems. But you can't go just a few posts into a new game preview or a reveal without someone turning it into a affirmative action debacle.
 
Why did you ever have faith with the larger internet gaming community? Or any large internet community, for that matter? Also, how did GamerGate in general not have this affect ages ago?

The reason I love Neogaf so much is because everyone acts like reasonable people, although even here it can get iffy sometimes.
 
Drama does not mean I dont think its real...im saying I come to GAF for game news, the community, the Off topic, etc. Threads about Gamer Gate or gaming jornalism / pr personalities are not interesting to me.
Fair enough. On first read it was a little different.
 
As someone who frequents hip-hop / music boards, and more importantly, sports boards, Gaming is waaaaaaaay the hell better. Political boards used to be much worse prior to everyone sort of going to their own little circlejerks for the most part (myself included). Gamers tend to be pretty normal all things considered when you look at the whole rather than the outliers who get news / controversy.

(Seriously, gamers can't even fathom how crazy sports fans get)

Not that I don't believe you, but does the sports community have a thinly-veiled subreddit dedicated to driving out voices of diversity in sports? Like, I genuinely don't know. I'm not denying people in other communities or with other hobbies can't be terrible people, but I get the impression from the outside looking in that those people don't organize the way they do in gaming.
 

galvatron

Member
This thread should be added to OP's list ...I don't know half the drama being discussed here, but it makes me almost happy to have few hardcore gaming friends.
 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
IT ISN'T OUR POSITION TO JUDGE.

Christ how easy is it to follow this line of thinking?

It's not hard to follow at all. I'm pretty much with you right there, but at the same time:

Right, then it's not our position to judge if Nintendo was right or wrong in firing her.

I'm with this poster. It can't just be one-sided.
 
I'm kind of torn here. If this is not open to discussion at all, then please just let me know and I'll edit it out, but I'm not comfortable with this really stark crackdown about any commentary on the latest speculation about Rapp's moonlighting profession. The air in this thread is kind of off-putting, honestly.

In some of the previous threads, when no evidence was available, plenty of people posted about hypothetical situations in which it would have been perfectly reasonable for Nintendo to terminate her employment.

If we're not allowed to speculate at all, despite this all being a very public incident, then that's fine, but shouldn't it go both ways? People can say Nintendo was terrible and out of line with the termination (and timing-wise, I agree), but if they are going to do that then context is important, isn't it? If we're all going to agree to just shut up and stop talking about the issue because we should respect Rapp's privacy (a sentiment I agree with), then I don't think anyone should be commenting on whether or not Nintendo made a bad decision in firing her.

The context matters, but not the context of Nintendo firing Rapp for whatever people want to speculate (I don't want to get into that). The simple fact is that they decided to let her ago after months of her dealing with harassment by an organized hate mob.

This same mob wanted nothing but to get her fired and Nintendo just vindicated everything they done to her and (countless other victims in the gaming industry) by doing exactly that in the end. That's why people are arguing that Nintendo made a bad decision.
 
IT ISN'T OUR POSITION TO JUDGE.

Christ how easy is it to follow this line of thinking?

I've honestly seen very little judgement over her character in this thread, mainly just people saying that the reason she was fired was misrepresented. Also there's apparently been an article in the Washing Journal regarding this so there is "potentially" some truth behind it.

Right, then it's not our position to judge if Nintendo was right or wrong in firing her.

also this
 
But do you not think that this minority is a problem? I should hope that we're all able to separate ourselves from them. But just turning a blind eye to the fact that this stuff is going on and is having actual effects on actual, fellow members of the community, is what allows this kind of thing to keep happening.
I never said anything about turning a blind eye towards the vocal minority that ruin people's lives. The title of the thread is " the larger internet gaming community"

I still think the larger internet gaming community is fine
 
it's a shame that I can be associated with that behavior because I have a shared hobby with these people.

I don't worry about this too much because nobody outside the hardcore gaming/tech community seems to know or care about any of the controversies that get places like NeoGAF up in arms. I've not once had a coworker, casual-gaming friend, or family member mention, discuss, or ask about Gamergate or anything of the sort. Anecdotal, for sure, but I don't worry too much about having any negative social connotations about being a serious "gamer" other than the old standbys like I must be a socially maladjusted nerd, and that's been around for decades. Society on the whole still doesn't take the hobby seriously and maybe that's part of the problem. If they did and more light was shown on the problems, maybe some of these things would improve. As-is, it's mainly just online forum-dwellers and people who actually work in the industry that seem to care.
 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
The context matters, but not the context of Nintendo firing Rapp for whatever people want to speculate. The simple fact is that they decided to let her ago after months of her dealing with harassment by an organized hate mob.

This same mob wanted nothing but to get her fired and Nintendo just vindicated them by doing exactly that in the end.
That's why most are arguing that Nintendo made a bad decision.

I understand that, and I completely agree that the timing was extremely poor and it looks really bad.

With that said, without the context, there's no reasonable way to judge Nintendo or Rapp.

Or are people arguing that there is simply no possible context in which Nintendo could not have found itself in a position where immediate termination was the only decision available to them?
 

Lime

Member
Yeah, I'm quite disgusted by the games industry, but I feel that things need to be spoken to. Maybe engaging with these things are simply not the right avenue for you, but instead you should focus your energy and self-care differently. E.g. take it up with the companies and societies creating these people.
 

Abriael

Banned
did someone just say "pulling the race card" in reference to better representation in gaming?

wtf

I believe "pulling the race card" has been used in reference to a very thinly veiled racist remark, that seems to be widely tolerated because it's against white people.

Personally, I consider the gaming community to be one of the best out there. It's full of passionate people that love their hobby, which is also my hobby. Unfortunately, not all niche communities in gaming are the same, but this doesn't mean that the gaming community as a whole isn't great. The same happens in every community where humans consort.
 

low-G

Member
Gaming is pretty popular. The community includes people from the furthest spectrums and beliefs and everyone between.

Remember how people get up in arms when women & POC are put in a movie? Remember the diversity issues in movies.

Games are popular. The community is all humans.
 
There's no discussion to be had if people can't speculate as we don't know the lady.

Sure there is. This thread isn't about what she was doing outside of her employment. The OP actually was very careful never to address this at all. This thread's topic is specifically about the way certain sectors of internet gaming culture behave toward people they perceive as outsiders.

And there's already good discussion happening around just that topic.
 
On Topic, I totally agree. Internet gaming communities are like if the nerds suddenly became the jocks in Highschool.

But young nerds are the exact kind of people that would have a lot of pent up rage when you think about. Not that it excuses them for their terrible behavior...
 
(usually white) people, amirite? And this is an example of why I personally am disenchanted with the gaming community. Everyone seems so wrapped up in identity politics that games can't even be fun for them anymore. People only want to talk about how progressive they are and how they won't play a game/support a studio/etc. unless they fit the current popular political ideology.

disregarding the obvious slanted wording, is that such a bad thing? Is it wrong for people to not support developers/publishers if one feels like their games are perpetuating a problem (in that person's eyes)?

I was going to say pretty much the same thing, but you hit the nail on the head.

People pulling the race card, screaming bigotry, and gender shaming. Jesus people, give it a rest..

I mean, there's nothing wrong with discussing these problems. But you can't go just a few posts into a new game preview or a reveal without someone turning it into a affirmative action debacle.

If no one ever talks about it, nothing ever gets done...
 

Wensih

Member
I don't worry about this too much because nobody outside the hardcore gaming/tech community seems to know or care about any of the controversies that get places like NeoGAF up in arms. I've not once had a coworker, casual-gaming friend, or family member mention, discuss, or ask about Gamergate or anything of the sort. Anecdotal, for sure, but I don't worry too much about having any negative social connotations about being a serious "gamer" other than the old standbys like I must be a socially maladjusted nerd, and that's been around for decades. Society on the whole still doesn't take the hobby seriously and maybe that's part of the problem. If they did and more light was shown on the problems, maybe some of these things would improve. As-is, it's mainly just online forum-dwellers and people who actually work in the industry that seem to care.

Oddly enough I heard, within the past week, them mentioned on my way home from work on NPR in a segment about internet harrassment. The topic of internet harrassment is becoming more frequent in mainstream media.
 

Surface of Me

I'm not an NPC. And neither are we.
Not that I don't believe you, but does the sports community have a thinly-veiled subreddit dedicated to driving out voices of diversity in sports? Like, I genuinely don't know. I'm not denying people in other communities or with other hobbies can't be terrible people, but I get the impression from the outside looking in that those people don't organize the way they do in gaming.

Do you forget literal riots happen when a sports team loses sometimes? Gaming is small time.
 
I never said anything about turning a blind eye towards the vocal minority that ruin people's lives. The title of the thread is " the larger internet gaming community"

I still think the larger internet gaming community is fine

But the larger community in itself by definition cannot be fine, if this percentage of it is becoming more and more active and hard to ignore. Even here on GAF, which is pretty much one of the only gaming communities I actually enjoy visiting, you can just look at any of the "controversial subject" threads and see that the kinds of mentalities that define this minority are deeply-rooted in numerous facets of the community.

If you don't see a problem then okay, but for myself, it's just reached a point where it has coloured virtually every game community there is.
 

Puppen

Banned
Right, then it's not our position to judge if Nintendo was right or wrong in firing her.

Yes it is. Do you have even the slightest idea about the background of this case?

But the larger community in itself by definition cannot be fine, if this percentage of it is becoming more and more active and hard to ignore. Even here on GAF, which is pretty much one of the only gaming communities I actually enjoy visiting, you can just look at any of the "controversial subject" threads and see that the kinds of mentalities that define this minority are deeply-rooted in numerous facets of the community.

If you don't see a problem then okay, but for myself, it's just reached a point where it has coloured virtually every game community there is.

Exactly. It's everywhere.
 
did someone just say "pulling the race card" in reference to better representation in gaming?

wtf

I think we all know what kind of posts to expect from certain posters by now lol

OP, you really do see the worst of it on the net because it's much easier for people to be antagonistic. It's treated as an anonymous (for the most part) interaction with no real consequences even for behavior that would be considered criminal were it through some older method of communication. But as was said earlier, interacting with more of the community in person shows the bright side.
 
I understand that, and I completely agree that the timing was extremely poor and it looks really bad.

With that said, without the context, there's no reasonable way to judge Nintendo or Rapp.

Or are people arguing that there is simply no possible context in which Nintendo could not have found itself in a position where immediate termination was the only decision available to them?

They could have denounced the harassment while it was happening and not after they fired her. That was the least they could have done but they just threw her under the bus. Did I mention how shitty it was that they publicly revealed the circumstances of her termination? What kind of company does that in a press release for a individual employee.

Nintendo could have handled this situation a shit ton better.
 

Fjordson

Member
Happened to me years ago tbh. I don't keep up with the industry or gaming news anymore, I just stay on the lookout for games I might be interested in and read a few reviewers I trust.
 

TM94

Member
If we're not allowed to speculate at all, despite this all being a very public incident, then that's fine, but shouldn't it go both ways? People can say Nintendo was terrible and out of line with the termination (and timing-wise, I agree), but if they are going to do that then context is important, isn't it? If we're all going to agree to just shut up and stop talking about the issue because we should respect Rapp's privacy (a sentiment I agree with), then I don't think anyone should be commenting on whether or not Nintendo made a bad decision in firing her.

Excellent point that won't be picked up by posters who only want to keep pushing their agenda.
 

Joyful

Member
Ok.

The person seems genuinely clueless/misinformed/ignorant. Maybe providing the correct information instead of trying to get them banned would be a better approach.

Another ugly side of the gaming community. Everyone seems to be out for blood these days.

quotes are like a ban multiplier
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom