I'm kind of torn here. If this is not open to discussion at all, then please just let me know and I'll edit it out, but I'm not comfortable with this really stark crackdown about any commentary on the latest speculation about Rapp's moonlighting profession. The air in this thread is kind of off-putting, honestly.
In some of the previous threads, when no evidence was available, plenty of people posted about hypothetical situations in which it would have been perfectly reasonable for Nintendo to terminate her employment.
If we're not allowed to speculate at all, despite this all being a very public incident, then that's fine, but shouldn't it go both ways? People can say Nintendo was terrible and out of line with the termination (and timing-wise, I agree), but if they are going to do that then context is important, isn't it? If we're all going to agree to just shut up and stop talking about the issue because we should respect Rapp's privacy (a sentiment I agree with), then I don't think anyone should be commenting on whether or not Nintendo made a bad decision in firing her.
What business does whatever she was doing (and I'm not even saying that's what it was) have to do with you. Are you trying to shame her?
It's no one's business, but if the claim is true, and it had been pretty public at the time of her firing, I imagine the reaction would have been a hell of a lot different. I think it's relevant as long as the discussion is taking place at all. In respect of Alison, simply not talking about it at all would be appropriate, but any discussion about the righteousness of Nintendo's actions must also not be allowed in that case. That's how I see it, anyway.