My audience gasped and then after a few moments started applauding and the applause grew to a fairly impressive level before it died down. Yeah, the ending satisfies.
Er, what? harson wasn't confused by the end, nor was Ghaleon, and neither was I. Not liking ambiguity =/= confused :lol Nothing in this movie is confusing. There is far too much exposition to have the problem of confusing people.
Why don't some people like ambiguity in movies? For me some of the greatest movies are the ones that don't spell everything out for the audience and leave something open for interpretation.
Ambiguity is fine. Many of my favorite movies are ambiguous (2001, hello!). I just happen to feel that it works for certain movies, and doesnt for others. My Inception experience was one that left me yearning for a solid conclusion. The emotional payoff feels incomplete, or keeping on-topic, in limbo.
I thought it was really good but not a classic. It's really clever and it had some of the best special effects and sound design I've ever seen. I really enjoyed it.
No homo but I was really digging the suits and overall clothes that Arthur and the rest of the characters were wearing. Great movie though. Went in without knowing anything about it.
No homo but I was really digging the suits and overall clothes that Arthur and the rest of the characters were wearing. Great movie though. Went in without knowing anything about it.
Why don't some people like ambiguity in movies? For me some of the greatest movies are the ones that don't spell everything out for the audience and leave something open for interpretation.
The Sopranos' ending is ambiguous for the sake of being ambiguous.
Inception's ending being ambiguous couldn't have fit more perfectly with the rest of the film, and its theme of blurring the lines between dreams and reality.
The Sopranos' ending is ambiguous for the sake of being ambiguous.
Inception's ending being ambiguous couldn't have fit more perfectly with the rest of the film, and its theme of blurring the lines between dreams and reality.
I'll say the opposite, the problem with this being ambiguous is because it is all about reality and dreams. Its like having a character killed off, then finding out it was a dream episode. Leaving this open meant that everything could have been real or none of it. I didn't feel that was a good way to leave the movie off where it can swing the entire movie depending on the interpretation.
Easy 10/10.
Saw it 3 times in last 4 days. Never do that with movies.
+ Loved the acting; one of the best ensemble casts in a while. Especially Hardy, JGL and Murphy.
+ Incredible visual effects that didn't rely on CGI aka one of the most intense fight sequences in a while.
+ Really breath-taking score that helps sustain the tension filled and the sadder scenes.
+ The elegance of the exposition. Never boring, the characters beautifully explain the rules of the film.
+ Some visually beautiful shots and most of all - a real emotional core
Fisher-dad relationship, Mal and Cobb
in a Nolan film!
- Tom Berenger. Sorry but I didn't like him in this.
- While the score is good, Nolan may have made it too intrusive and overused.
- The
mark and reason for the inception; dissolve a competitor's company
pretty much everyone in this movie was stylish on a level that defies logic. When you see how Nolan dresses, you just accept that when you're in his zone, straight doesn't mean anything anymore. It is raw admiration for style and manliness happening.
Why don't some people like ambiguity in movies? For me some of the greatest movies are the ones that don't spell everything out for the audience and leave something open for interpretation.
I concur, and I thought Inception pulled it off beautifully. I love how the audience at my theater reacted to the end; there was this huge collective gasp of disbelief when the screen went black
with the top still spinning and wobbling oh-so-slightly
. It's been a while since I've been in an audience where everyone had such a strong reaction to the end of a film.
Why don't some people like ambiguity in movies? For me some of the greatest movies are the ones that don't spell everything out for the audience and leave something open for interpretation.
Eh, I'm not a big fan of ambiguity. It tends to feel like a cop out and it leaves much to be desired, not to mention the fact that it's a relatively exhausted method of conclusion. There are films where the narrative is ultimately better off without a proper ending, Amores Perros for example, but I don't think that's the case with Inception. Ambiguity done right tends to challenge you intellectually, and raise social or philosophical questions that are up to the viewer to ultimately interpret. Ambiguity in this case simply leaves the character's conclusion in question, and does very little outside of that unless you include the film's underlying theme, "dreams versus reality", which isn't that strong of a theme to begin with considering its impracticality within real world situations.
The father-son relationship leading up to the deathbed "Rosebud" moment left me cold even though I felt like it shouldn't because on paper it's a tremendously powerful emotional moment, but I think I figured out why. It's because we know it's fake. For Fischer it's absolutely real - as it needs to be in order for the con to work - but we know it's all just a construct, a piece of fiction designed to manipulate him. In fact we know that it's most probably opposite to the truth; that the dad never really loved him, thinks he's a disappointment etc. He never kept that windmill in his safe, it's all a lie. So the emotion doesn't land.
Easy 10/10.
Saw it 3 times in last 4 days. Never do that with movies.
+ Loved the acting; one of the best ensemble casts in a while. Especially Hardy, JGL and Murphy.
+ Incredible visual effects that didn't rely on CGI aka one of the most intense fight sequences in a while.
+ Really breath-taking score that helps sustain the tension filled and the sadder scenes.
+ The elegance of the exposition. Never boring, the characters beautifully explain the rules of the film.
+ Some visually beautiful shots and most of all - a real emotional core
Fisher-dad relationship, Mal and Cobb
in a Nolan film!
- Tom Berenger. Sorry but I didn't like him in this.
- While the score is good, Nolan may have made it too intrusive and overused.
- The
mark and reason for the inception; dissolve a competitor's company
I just want to echo just about all of this--saw it again tonight, clears up a lot of questions.
Christ, Cillian
got me again with the ending
And I agree with your critiques. Some of Berenger's delivery is ALMOST laughable (nothing like BB/TDK, tho). There were a few times (I didn't notice the first time) where the score actually overpowers some of the dialogue
(mostly in the snow assault...I didn't realize that Cillian turned off his radio because of the static, and that's why he didn't get Cobb's warnings
The father-son relationship leading up to the deathbed "Rosebud" moment left me cold even though I felt like it shouldn't because on paper it's a tremendously powerful emotional moment, but I think I figured out why. It's because we know it's fake. For Fischer it's absolutely real - as it needs to be in order for the con to work - but we know it's all just a construct, a piece of fiction designed to manipulate him. In fact we know that it's most probably opposite to the truth; that the dad never really loved him, thinks he's a disappointment etc. He never kept that windmill in his safe, it's all a lie. So the emotion doesn't land.
Eh, I agree, but to an extent. The moment still hits me hard, because of Cillian's performance and all that is behind it. Realizing that it's all a lie, later, just makes it tragic, IMO. Not a bad thing, though.
The father-son relationship leading up to the deathbed "Rosebud" moment left me cold even though I felt like it shouldn't because on paper it's a tremendously powerful emotional moment, but I think I figured out why. It's because we know it's fake. For Fischer it's absolutely real - as it needs to be in order for the con to work - but we know it's all just a construct, a piece of fiction designed to manipulate him. In fact we know that it's most probably opposite to the truth; that the dad never really loved him, thinks he's a disappointment etc. He never kept that windmill in his safe, it's all a lie. So the emotion doesn't land.
The father-son relationship leading up to the deathbed "Rosebud" moment left me cold even though I felt like it shouldn't because on paper it's a tremendously powerful emotional moment, but I think I figured out why. It's because we know it's fake. For Fischer it's absolutely real - as it needs to be in order for the con to work - but we know it's all just a construct, a piece of fiction designed to manipulate him. In fact we know that it's most probably opposite to the truth; that the dad never really loved him, thinks he's a disappointment etc. He never kept that windmill in his safe, it's all a lie. So the emotion doesn't land.
Might be the best movie I've seen in a decade. Finally something with a decent budget that doesn't endlessly pander to the general public. There are a few films that hit me the right way and rekindle my love of cinema. Lost in Translation, Zodiac, No Country and now Inception are four from the past decade that pulled me out of a state of indifference. I hope the big studios take notice and follow in Nolan's footsteps.
Might be the best movie I've seen in a decade. Finally something with a decent budget that doesn't endlessly pander to the general public. There are a few films that hit me the right way and rekindle my love of cinema. Lost in Translation, Zodiac, No Country and now Inception are four from the past decade that pulled me out of a state of indifference. I hope the big studios take notice and follow in Nolan's footsteps.
Might be the best movie I've seen in a decade. Finally something with a decent budget that doesn't endlessly pander to the general public. There are a few films that hit me the right way and rekindle my love of cinema. Lost in Translation, Zodiac, No Country and now Inception are four from the past decade that pulled me out of a state of indifference. I hope the big studios take notice and follow in Nolan's footsteps.
I wouldn't get your hopes up, this was a pretty rare case of a film-maker getting to write his own ticket after delivering one of the biggest hits of all time. I wouldn't expect it to start a trend in big-budget original sci-fi film-making because Hollywood remains as risk-averse as it always has, if not moreso now than ever.
If youre Christopher Nolan and your film Inception is about to gross a $21 million Friday, wouldnt you want to sneak into a theater to check out audience reaction? Unfortunately for Nolan, he chose the wrong screening last night.
According to one of our spies, the big show at Los Angeless Arclight Cinemas was shut down at the 100-minute mark after the air conditioning malfunctioned, turning the theater into a sweltering hotbox.
Spotted outside the theater were Chris Nolan and Dileep Rao looking really concerned about the whole situation. Both were working their phones furiously (while signing a few autographs) and appeared to head back towards the theater as we headed out to find another screen to watch the rest of the film.
It's fantastic, but if you go to the Dome which is the main theater be prepared for the screen to be in a weirdly concave shape that bends the image slightly.
No homo but I was really digging the suits and overall clothes that Arthur and the rest of the characters were wearing. Great movie though. Went in without knowing anything about it.
I'll say the opposite, the problem with this being ambiguous is because it is all about reality and dreams. Its like having a character killed off, then finding out it was a dream episode. Leaving this open meant that everything could have been real or none of it. I didn't feel that was a good way to leave the movie off where it can swing the entire movie depending on the interpretation.