GhaleonEB said:I didn't know, until I read the article -jinx- posted.
http://www.slate.com/id/2181008/
I had no idea. What a fucking joke. :\
Karma Kramer said:wtf
thats bullshit
grandjedi6 said:What? You didn't realize this? You should also read up on Larry Sabato's view of the caucus. No one likes the current system except Iowa and New Hampshire
Sylar said:The New Hampshire Primary has historical meaning though.
But Iowa? What the fuck comes from Iowa?
grandjedi6 said:What? You didn't realize this? You should also read up on Larry Sabato's view of the caucus. No one likes the current system except Iowa and New Hampshire
camineet said:Iowa means absolutely NOTHING
New Hampshire only has some symbolic meaning.
I did, dammit!Sylar said:But Iowa? What the fuck comes from Iowa?
thefro said:
thefro said:
GhaleonEB said:![]()
And humble, too.
siamesedreamer said:Awesome find...it updates in real time.
slidewinder said:C-SPAN 1 is showing a live feed of a Democratic caucus. Looks to be just getting started.
Smiles and Cries said:it does not seem to match the MSNBC.com
Those are based on entrance polls, the numbers on that site are the actual precincts reporting.Kusagari said:Why is every major news outlet saying Obama/Clinton are far out in front yet that real time updater has Edwards owning them both?
Because those outlets are going off the early entrance polls, not the results.Kusagari said:Why is every major news outlet saying Obama/Clinton are far out in front yet that real time updater has Edwards owning them both?
Kusagari said:Why is every major news outlet saying Obama/Clinton are far out in front yet that real time updater has Edwards owning them both?
FilosopherStoner said:I am not too much into politics, but what the fuck, watching the republican caucus on cspan, it looks soooooo... imprecise.
Souldriver said:Edwards is crushing both Clinton and Obama at this point...
yep, only 2% :/echoshifting said:*sigh* As has been pointed out, an incredibly small percentage has reported at this point. The entry polls putting Obama and Clinton neck and neck are still a more accurate barometer than iowacaucusresults.com or anyone reporting actual numbers.
I wasn't implying Edwards is going to win based on those tiny partial results, I'm not stupid.echoshifting said:*sigh* As has been pointed out, an incredibly small percentage has reported at this point. The entry polls putting Obama and Clinton neck and neck are still a more accurate barometer than iowacaucusresults.com or anyone reporting actual numbers.