Zeyphersan
Banned
If I buy the Lightning to USB C cable, can I use my MacBook Pro's 87W charger for fast charging?
Yes
If I buy the Lightning to USB C cable, can I use my MacBook Pro's 87W charger for fast charging?
Will the cable appropriately reduce the output to what an iPhone should be getting?
Will the cable appropriately reduce the output to what an iPhone should be getting?
So with all the talk of supply constraints going into next year (of course its all speculation for now), what is everybodys plan for the X? Are you in no matter the supply backlog? Will you go for an 8/8+ instead if the wait is too long or stick with your current device?
For me, Im going to attempt to upgrade via the IUP when preorders open. If I can get one within a month or so, Ill wait for the X, otherwise Im going to just stick with my 7+ and wait for the X2 next year.
Yeah, I (and no other iPhone user I personally know) have never been in a pinch because the phone charged too "slow". Totally don't get what the fuss is about and that's probably why Apple didn't even bother to mention it on stage. But nice to have I guess.
I'll probably just get a USB-C to Lightning cable anyway since I've got the 29w charger already but considering Xcode can do wireless debugging now I don't even know why I would connect my iPhone to the MacBook.
Daring Fireball post yesterday insists that the TouchID scramble (and failure) is BS. Claims that Apple engineers have said that TouchID under the screen has been dead for sometime.. not because they couldn't (though they didn't) but because for sometime now FaceID was deemed better and more convenient/accurate.
Also from Apple "friends" (not marketers) that going back to a TouchID device feels so weird having to press a button to get to Home.. compared to the X which you are always just right there.
Yah. I also think battery life might be a concern since you're eligible for a free swap if it hits 80% within 24 months. And I can't help but feel using fast charging on a regular basis is detrimential to battery health. So that's why they are not embracing it at all.They probably also didnt mention it because you have to buy separate accessories, the brick and the cable, providing you dont have either.
Both of which should be in the box already, If cheaper Android counterparts can include these there is no reason why Apple couldn't other than greed.
They probably also didnt mention it because you have to buy separate accessories, the brick and the cable, providing you dont have either.
Both of which should be in the box already, If cheaper Android counterparts can include these there is no reason why Apple couldn't other than greed.
FACE ID AS THE REPLACEMENT FOR TOUCH ID
Apple made this decision well over a year ago. Perhaps the fundamental goal of iPhone X was to get as close as they could to an edge-to-edge display. No chin whatsoever. There were, of course, early attempts to embed a Touch ID sensor under the display as a Plan B. But Apple became convinced that Face ID was the way to go over a year ago. I heard this yesterday from multiple people at Apple, including engineers whove been working on the iPhone X project for a very long time. They stopped pursuing Touch ID under the display not because they couldnt do it, but because they decided they didnt need it. I do believe its true that they never got Touch ID working, but thats because they abandoned it in favor of Face ID early.
I dont know why recent supply chain rumors suggest Apple was scrambling to get Touch ID working on iPhone X as late as this summer, and no one at Apple seems to know either. Disinformation campaign from competitors?
There is clearly skepticism out there about Face ID. Some people think Face ID is going to suck, and a lot of people are flat-out assuming that theyre going to miss Touch ID. We saw the same thing with Touch ID when it was announced, and the skeptics were very wrong. I havent used it personally, but I am pretty sure already that the skeptics are going to be wrong about Face ID too. This piece at Ars Technica by Ron Amadeo is going to age poorly, I suspect.
The only time Ive spent playing with an iPhone X was about 10-15 minutes in the hands-on area after the event, and I did not get a chance to try Face ID. But I spent time both officially, as a member of the media, and unofficially, as a friend with several Apple employees who are already carrying an iPhone X as their daily-use phone, and from what I observed and from what they told me and again, several of these employees are engineers, not PR or product marketing folks it just works. You dont have to think about it. According to them, you get used to not thinking about it very quickly, and when you go back to a Touch ID device, it feels broken that you have to touch the button to unlock the device.
One of the places where I saw it working instantly and effortlessly was a really dark room. It just works.
At first I can see myself trying to use Touch ID as a muscle memory thing. But I can see how it becomes more natural to just look at the phone and boom it's unlocked.
No, it doesnt show your face at all and still show the traditional lock screen with your wallpaper.You need to see your mug on the screen to unlock the phone? That's how face-id works?
Yeah she has pretty tiny hands but the height alone does seem to make this a two handed phone.Maybe she's just got small hand but she makes the X look huge
Although MKBHD even says it's not a one handed phone even for him.
I still don't understand how Face ID is better. By swiping up, that's one more extra step compared with touch id.
I dont see how?
Touch ID
1. Raise the phone with your thumb on the home button. Or press the home button, keeping your thumb on it. Phone instantly unlocks and is ready to use as soon as you lay your eyes on it.
Face ID
1. Raise the phone.
1b. align it with your face.
Then wait... (how long exactly I don't know but it didn't feel so quick in the demos)
2. Swipe Up
I hope the review can clarify how fast FaceID really is...
Touch ID
1. Raise the phone with your thumb on the home button. Or press the home button, keeping your thumb on it.
Face ID
1. Raise the phone.
2. Swipe Up
So you either raise the phone with your thumb on the bottom of the screen and then lift your thumb, or you raise the phone with your thumb on the bottom of the screen and then... flick your thumb up
Truly a burden.
According to them, you get used to not thinking about it very quickly, and when you go back to a Touch ID device, it feels broken that you have to touch the button to unlock the device.
No. You just swipe up. It scans your face in the instant between swiping up and moving to the home screen.
No one said it was a burden. I asked how Face ID is better, you asked me how it was an extra step and i explained how.
Any video showing this?
All the ones I've seen were like: lift up the phone, look at it, see the icon going from locked to unlock, swipe up.
The deliberate steps might have been just to explain the process to the journalists but I'd like to see the whole thing done as in real life situation.
Any video showing this?
All the ones I've seen were like: lift up the phone, look at it, see the icon going from locked to unlock, swipe up.
The deliberate steps might have been just to explain the process to the journalists but I'd like to see the whole thing done as in real life situation.
Wife spotted my used 6s arriving and asked what it was for. She was ok with my plan of waiting for the X, but did point out 'its ok for you to spend £1000 on a phone, but not ok for me to spend the same on a handbag'. Putting aside the difference in use cases, I pointed out thatd I'd told her plenty of times to buy a (stupidly expensive) handbag, and its just her nature to prefer to age money.
So this phone might end up costing the household £2000
Opposite bias:Touch ID
1. Raise the phone with your thumb on the home button. Or press the home button, keeping your thumb on it.
Face ID
1. Raise the phone.
2. Swipe Up
It's not an extra step, you were being deliberately obtuse with touchID steps. There is no difference between having to push the home button and swiping up when counting ”steps"
You don't have to wait for that animation
Opposite bias:
Touch ID
1. Raise your phone
2. Touch/press the home button
Face ID
1. Raise your phone with your thumb swiping up
No bias:
Both have the same number of steps to get to the home screen.
Wife spotted my used 6s arriving and asked what it was for. She was ok with my plan of waiting for the X, but did point out 'its ok for you to spend £1000 on a phone, but not ok for me to spend the same on a handbag'. Putting aside the difference in use cases, I pointed out thatd I'd told her plenty of times to buy a (stupidly expensive) handbag, and its just her nature to prefer to age money.
So this phone might end up costing the household £2000
If it works as advertised, with an unlock at any angle as long as the eyes, nose, and mouth are in view, it will make no difference for most people.To me it seems clear that touch ID can be unlocked faster and easier if one is really focused on that (scanning while pulling up the phone). I actually paid attention to how I unlock my 5s or the S7 Edge the last days and I always look at the phone while I use the fingerprint scanner.
Most of the time I'm checking whether there is any new missed message/ mail that warrants me unlocking the phone. So for me personally it would make zero difference I think.
If it works as advertised, with an unlock at any angle as long as the eyes, nose, and mouth are in view, it will make no difference for most people.
Just buy a Coach/Smythson for her...relatively inexpensive
It will show stuff that's not visible on the actual screenI wonder, if you take a screenshot on iPhone X, will it have bunny ears and rounded corners, or will it show stuff that is not visible on the actual screen?
Source.Apple is poised to be able to ship about 40 million iPhone X units before the end of 2017, which won't be nearly enough to meet consumer demand for the redesigned handset with edge-to-edge OLED display, according to analyst Ming-Chi Kuo.
I wanna see the receipts
People need justification for their actions.Why are people saying you have to raise your phone with TouchID? I leave it on my desk and unlock it all the time and never pick it up. Can't do that with FaceID.
Why women want to spend that much on a handbag is beyond me. My ex and I were in Selfridges one day when she spotted a Pauls Boutique bag that she simply needed to have it was just shy of £700. Its okay to spend £700 on a fucking bag, but God forbid I spend £50 on a nerdy videogame.Wife spotted my used 6s arriving and asked what it was for. She was ok with my plan of waiting for the X, but did point out 'its ok for you to spend £1000 on a phone, but not ok for me to spend the same on a handbag'. Putting aside the difference in use cases, I pointed out thatd I'd told her plenty of times to buy a (stupidly expensive) handbag, and its just her nature to prefer to age money.
So this phone might end up costing the household £2000