afternoon delight
Member
Hearing this makes me think we need a better Patriot Act and less restrictive torture laws.
One thing about the France attacks is why are they conducting all those raids now instead of a couple of weeks if not days ago? Maybe these attacks could have been prevented had they performed these raids earlier
Hearing this makes me think we need a better Patriot Act and less restrictive torture laws.
The attack that occurred in Paris was well-coordinated, it must have taken some time for planning and acquisition of materials. The United States has a much stronger domestic intelligence program that likely prevents most such plans in the planning stages. This is different from most mass shootings which are perpetrated by "lone wolf" types who don't typically communicate with anyone until just before they set their plan into motion.
I was honey pottin' but come on, don't respond like this. Trust and use your better nature despite the fear machine working overtime.I am quite liberal but definitely moving toward the right when it comes to national security, so I hear you.
Hearing this makes me think we need a better Patriot Act and less restrictive torture laws.
I'm not sure how you'd establish which country has a stronger domestic intelligence apparatus, especially considering the security challenges Frances faces are different to the ones that face the USA.
I am quite liberal but definitely moving toward the right when it comes to national security, so I hear you.
Just waiting for the day one of them sets off a Nukecase and the whole world comes crashing down...
Every country in NATO should just go all out (figuratively speaking of course) against ISIS, we have to stand together and support one another, waiting for another bomb attack to intensify our efforts will just lead to more needless deaths.
It is a difficult situation. Carpet bombing everything will just make us terrorists but how can you fight an enemy that you can barely see? Best way would be to destroy them from within, deploy specialized infiltration teams, covert ops, assassinations, not armoured brigades or infantry waves. Precise surgical strikes on individuals, that is the only way we can defeat them while still retaining some level of humanity ourselves.
eh I'm not talking about our own liberties. Why is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed allowed to still be alive? Why don't we have a 'no tolerance' approach against terrorism?Mass surveillance and useless torture are not a 'left' or 'right' wing issue. They are an issue of liberty and the rule of the law.
Terrorists know that people are more likely to throw away their freedoms and protections from their government when they feel threatened. This is partly why they they conduct terrorist attacks.
Terrorism in the Western world is so far down the list of issues we have to be worried about that the response to it is absolutely ludicrous. Imagine if problems that actually kill tens or hundreds of thousands of people each year were met with the same rush to destroy our liberties. I imagine we'd all have cameras in our homes and cars to make sure we weren't eating our way to heart disease.
Any reasonable person should be as worried about being killed by a terrorist attack as being struck by lightning.
The best response, as those stupid posters say, is to keep calm and carry on.
yeah, don't look up "honey potting" on Urban Dictionary hahaI was honey pottin' but come on, don't respond like this. Trust and use your better nature despite the fear machine working overtime.
eh I'm not talking about our own liberties. Why is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed allowed to still be alive? Why don't we have a 'no tolerance' approach against terrorism?
That's what they try since like forever, and how did that ever change anything?
I say, if they are so keen on going to war, carpet bomb the shit out of them.
But what do you carpet bomb?
According to an initial assessment, 116 trucks were destroyed in the attack, which took place near Deir al-Zour, an area in eastern Syria that is controlled by the Islamic State.
The airstrikes were carried out by four A-10 attack planes and two AC-130 gunships based in Turkey.
That's where the wonderful A-10 comes in.
U.S. Warplanes Strike ISIS Oil Trucks in Syria
116 trucks by 4 planes. Not bad.
That's where the wonderful A-10 comes in.
U.S. Warplanes Strike ISIS Oil Trucks in Syria
116 trucks by 4 planes. Not bad.
That's where the wonderful A-10 comes in.
U.S. Warplanes Strike ISIS Oil Trucks in Syria
116 trucks by 4 planes. Not bad.
Why don't they just take out the refineries, pipelines...you know the source? Pointless trying to hit the trucks if the entire infrastructure is left in place. No one is really serious about stopping this, everyone is just playing at the edges.
That will be very difficult to do. Not impossible though.Just waiting for the day one of them gets ahold of an old Soviet nuke and the whole world comes crashing down...
This is what worries me the most. I don't see any solid effort on the side of the free world in dealing with this. From where I am sitting it looks like ISIS are pretty much left alone to do whatever they want.
Why don't they just take out the refineries, pipelines...you know the source? Pointless trying to hit the trucks if the entire infrastructure is left in place. No one is really serious about stopping this, everyone is just playing at the edges.
Apparently that is Trump's plan.
Why don't they just take out the refineries, pipelines...you know the source? Pointless trying to hit the trucks if the entire infrastructure is left in place. No one is really serious about stopping this, everyone is just playing at the edges.
Why don't they just take out the refineries, pipelines...you know the source? Pointless trying to hit the trucks if the entire infrastructure is left in place. No one is really serious about stopping this, everyone is just playing at the edges.
This is what worries me the most. I don't see any solid effort on the side of the free world in dealing with this. From where I am sitting it looks like ISIS are pretty much left alone to do whatever they want.
Hearing this makes me think we need a better Patriot Act and less restrictive torture laws.
There was a former CIA employee that is a conservative commentator on CNN that explained why this is an issue and just sounds like a good idea in theory. It's an issue because the oil infrastructure has to be rebuilt afterward or you're just creating more chaos in the region.
Basically said Trump is wrong.
It did happen, 14 years ago. If attacks do happen, they will be by lone wolves like the Boston Marathon Bombings.I'm really surprised an attack like Friday's hasn't happened in the States yet. It's my biggest fear when it comes to terrorism.
He is a clown but I would like to know the reason why no one has done this so far. It makes no sense that it hasn't been done. There are articles in the fucking FT talking about the ISIS oil supply, via smugglers through Turkey etc.
They arent targeting the oil because they want it and the infrastructure.
They arent targeting the oil because they want it and the infrastructure.
Hearing this makes me think we need a better Patriot Act and less restrictive torture laws.
Get ready for those three hour commutes.
It did happen, 14 years ago. If attacks do happen, they will be by lone wolves like the Boston Marathon Bombings.
I meant a large-scale terrorist attack that simply uses guns rather than a monumental event like 9/11.
I mean Holy Crap for a fragmented terrorist group with limited capabilities are beating the world?
Lol. I'm wondering exactly what the plan is then. They (The world) won't commit troops and will just airstrike it to death? Like that is going to force a regime change. We have to accept IS as a State and not a movement, and start strategically bombing important infrastructure. A truck here and there is not going to change anything. Were just going to be wallowing around for years. Or maybe that's the plan, who knows.