DeathbyVolcano
Banned
AniHawk said:You know I meant for the Wii.
No, I know. They gave us a little bit of info about Zelda Wii. Not a lot, but it's still an announcement.
AniHawk said:You know I meant for the Wii.
camineet said:they banned me until June 10 I think.
MiniDitka said:Don't know if this is fake or not but it was posted over at IGN.
http://i122.photobucket.com/albums/o252/MiniDitka/1244007921639.png
Update: Going by the art shown, it looks like the next console Zelda game will have an art style similar to Twilight Princess.
At the Shigeru Miyamoto roundtable tonight, it was revealed that an all-new entry in the Zelda series is in development. Only a small sampling of artwork was shown, including a picture of Link and what was possibly a Zora.
Xdrive05 said:Okay, so now that E3 passed with no public Zelda reveal, WHEN is the next likely event where we'll see this game? What other events do "main" Zelda games get revealed at (I only know about the E3 ones)?
Hobbun said:Well, theres the Nintendo conference in October. And TGS at the end of November.
After seeing Sony's tech demo of the sword and shield as well as the bow and arrow, I don't think I want to have a motion+ Zelda game.beelzebozo said:i have to imagine the reason we haven't seen a trailer is that they're building the engine from the ground up, and that the game will utilize motion+. if the TWILIGHT PRINCESS engine were going to be used again, surely they'd have pumped out something cinematic to showcase at e3.
Yeah, the bow was certainly a monster :lolbeelzebozo said:i don't necessarily think the motion+ will be used for sword controls and all that, though i could definitely be wrong. the most obvious usage of that technology won't necessarily be the one they choose.
personally, i could do without the motion+ stuff, apart from maybe for the bow (which was maybe the best utilization of motion control in twilight princess; that bow was a beast)
beelzebozo said:i don't necessarily think the motion+ will be used for sword controls and all that, though i could definitely be wrong. the most obvious usage of that technology won't necessarily be the one they choose.
personally, i could do without the motion+ stuff, apart from maybe for the bow (which was maybe the best utilization of motion control in twilight princess; that bow was a beast)
RubxQub said:Yeah, the bow was certainly a monster :lol
The one thing I wanted out of Nintendo was a new Zelda game so I was a bit let down by no announcement. I do hope they attempt to take the series in a new direction, either stylistically or gameplay-wise.
If it were just Twilight Princess 2 I'd be fine as well...
...I guess what I'm saying is that I really want another Zelda game :lol
Hobbun said:You beat me with the I dont think they will utilize the Motion+ for sword techniques. I would think that is the main thing it would be used for.
toxk_02 said:
toxk_02 said:Here we go:
http://tinyurl.com/p5hlgo
Or the Fierce Deity sword on his back. It's really odd, and such an awful resolution isn't helping. I mean, what the hell?tabsina said:if i did not read that that was a zora, i would not for one second guess that it is a zora.. to me it looks more like a really odd reflection off link
Jocchan said:Why do I get the feeling Miyamoto wanted to show Zelda at the conference, but was told not to because of two Mario games, Wii Fit/Sports sequels and Metroid already being there?
Apparently the game is already pretty far in development, so I think expecting it to show up this October isn't too far-fetched.
Prime Blue said:The real question is: Which industry professional has a mobile phone bad enough to be taking pictures at 76×115?
From what I gathered from the roundtable scraps, it seems that Miyamoto didn't want to waste development time working on a demo for E3, since they already had so much to show. They could've shown a trailer though, but since he's already talking about demo's I think the game will be ready by fall 2010. Also Miyamoto loves spilling the beans these days, first Pikmin 3 and now Zelda. Too bad that he won't be able to form a proper Pikmin team with all these Mario, Metroid and Zelda games in development. It seems that Nintendo is working on alot right now!Jocchan said:Why do I get the feeling Miyamoto wanted to show Zelda at the conference, but was told not to because of two Mario games, Wii Fit/Sports sequels and Metroid already being there?
Jason's Ultimatum said:Seems fake. Shiggy never mentioned a Zora. Only a woman in a blue robe.
Woffls said:I'm pretty sure that's not a Zora, and if it is, it's half Link and half Zora... and we all know what that means ;p
Jason's Ultimatum said:Also, they haven't even incorporated M+ yet? The way how Shiggy says it, seems like depending on the success of the device, they're waiting on adding it to the new Zelda Wii. Nintendo better be coming up with some unique and innovating shit for the game.
That's what I see too.Masked Man said:Wow... Seriously, GAF?
They said it was a blue-robed figure in front of link. It seems pretty clear that it's a blue-robed figure looking outward (toward the viewer) and slightly to the right, eyes hidden by shadow. By contrast, Link has his bank to the viewer and is facing left.
Am I the only one who sees it? =/
Fuu said:That's what I see too.
Meier said:I still am in shock that a Zelda game was not shown in some form during the conference. Hell, I would have been happy with a Wii port of Wind Waker with some wiimote integration. Something. Anything.
Meier said:Artwork means very little and makes a 2011 release seem much more likely. For there to be potentially 5 years in between TP and another Zelda game when TP was clearly designed for the Cube would be an embarassment.
That's what scares me. This is exactly like Pikmin 3 last year. So currently Zelda Wii == Pikmin 3 == Shovelware. And I give it a frak at this thread!BrandNew said:No, I know. They gave us a little bit of info about Zelda Wii. Not a lot, but it's still an announcement.
They released art for Zelda though. Pikmin 3 got nothing except a forced mention of the game.Jackano said:That's what scares me. This is exactly like Pikmin 3 last year. So currently Zelda Wii == Pikmin 3 == Shovelware. And I give it a frak at this thread!
Jasoco said:
You're missing out man. Second half of the game is WAY better.LaMeRz said:I got bored halfway through Twilight Princess and stopped playing.
camineet said:Well, my ban is over, and I know I fucked up royally (an understatement) on Tueday night during the Miyamoto roundtable... God, and it was so funny because I was almost redeemed when Zelda was semi kinda sorta revealed...the artwork...Oh god the hilarity, and thank you to all of those who voiced their opinions stating that I should be brought back, in various threads. I really suffered that night :lol
camineet said:Well, my ban is over, and I know I fucked up royally (an understatement) on Tueday night during the Miyamoto roundtable... God, and it was so funny because I was almost redeemed when Zelda was semi kinda sorta revealed...the artwork...Oh god the hilarity, and thank you to all of those who voiced their opinions stating that I should be brought back, in various threads. I really suffered that night :lol
RubxQub said:Yeah, the bow was certainly a monster :lol
The one thing I wanted out of Nintendo was a new Zelda game so I was a bit let down by no announcement. I do hope they attempt to take the series in a new direction, either stylistically or gameplay-wise.
If it were just Twilight Princess 2 I'd be fine as well...
...I guess what I'm saying is that I really want another Zelda game :lol