The Stealth Fox
Junior Member
Honestly, this sounds really fake.
EverSoTrendy said:Atheist lol. The epitome of stupid people. I gauge them right there with people who follow a religion.
EverSoTrendy said:Atheist lol. The epitome of stupid people. I gauge them right there with people who follow a religion.
jett said:agnostics ftw.
EverSoTrendy said:Atheist lol. The epitome of stupid people. I gauge them right there with people who follow a religion.
PhlegmMaster said:EverSoTrendy,
Don't be an idiot. Thanks.
happyfunball said:Exactly, with all the evidence out there for some crazy supernatural being, they gotta be some kind of idiots.
PhlegmMaster said:As always, the fundies will simply deny the evidence.
Comfort_Eagle said:If only we could get rid of Christianity, man would the world be better. Sadly, the people that believe in that bullshit wouldn't actually follow reason anyway. They are far too ****ed up for that.![]()
Comfort_Eagle said:If only we could get rid of Christianity, man would the world be better. Sadly, the people that believe in that bullshit wouldn't actually follow reason anyway. They are far too ****ed up for that.![]()
JayDubya said:Come on, terrene. You don't think it's proper to have healthy skepticism about Mr. King of the World finding the King of Kings and being able to prove the veracity of his claim? How on earth can someone do comparative DNA analysis with a dead guy from 2000 years ago of which there is no sample of anything with which to compare?
unifin said:heh - exactly. One of the main arguments people use against Jesus' existence, in fact, is that there were a friggin' ton of "Jesus"es in his time. There's no way this has any veracity.
karasu said:I honestly wish I could be an atheist sometimes.
Pikmindictator said:Jesus DNA? Now all we need is some raptor DNA and we can have:
JurrasicJesus Park
JayDubya said:How on earth can someone do comparative DNA analysis with a dead guy from 2000 years ago of which there is no sample of anything with which to compare?
He won't. Europe's best fooballer, and a huge legend and icon for every football loving country; Johan CruijffScullibundo said:I think Cameron is right in his bid to make sure only one saviour has the initials JC.
worst post I've ever read on GAF.CowGirl said:People still believe jesus was resurrected? :lol
tsef said:I think the point was to compare the DNA of the corpse identified as jesus with those of the corpses identified as mary and joseph to see if there was a link ( particularly with joseph)
Prof Kloner said there was no way the tomb housed the family of Jesus. "It is just not possible that a family who came from Galilee, as the New Testament tells us of Joseph and Mary, would be buried over several generations in [Occupied] Jerusalem."
Scullibundo said:I think Cameron is right in his bid to make sure only one saviour has the initials JC.
CrunchyB said:So, if not from THE LORD, where did that Y chromosome come from?![]()
Monk said:Some times it can be evil spirits that cause affliction on people. And those are the ones that can realy be instantly healed. Like what you find in Africa etc.
catfish said:oh.
phew.
Monk said:African people who practive voodoo/vodoun do ritauls where they do various things like animal sacrifices to swallowing human blood to get a blessing from divine spirits, and allow them selves to be possessed in the process.
Without knowing what type of "DNA evidence" is being referred to, who it might belong to, when it was from, or pretty much anything about Cameron's claims, I have no idea. Neither does Alucard. But that aside, even if there is truth to his findings, it will be denied tooth and nail by "counter-evidence" (specious, fabricated, or otherwise) until there's a mental "safety net" that makes believers feel comfortable again. So, whether it's shoddily-researched agitprop or the hard truth, it doesn't matter - this doc will have no impact at all.JayDubya said:Come on, terrene. You don't think it's proper to have healthy skepticism about Mr. King of the World finding the King of Kings and being able to prove the veracity of his claim? How on earth can someone do comparative DNA analysis with a dead guy from 2000 years ago of which there is no sample of anything with which to compare?
catfish said:definitely not hypnosis or self hypnosis, just the evil spirits?
look, if you drink human blood while doing a crazy dance, you aren't going to be alright. It has nothing to do with 'evil spirits' and everything to do with being ****ing crazy.Monk said:Hypnosis or self hypnosis? They are hypnotised into doing what exactly? believing that x is going to happen and as a result something completely different happens?
catfish said:look, if you drink human blood while doing a crazy dance, you aren't going to be alright. It has nothing to do with 'evil spirits' and everything to do with being ****ing crazy.
VinZuku said:Here's the link:
http://time-blog.com/middle_east/
Basically, Cameron is producing a documentary in which it's revealed (among other things) that Jesus wasn't resurrected, that his burial cave was discovered near Jerusalem, and that he had a child with Mary Magdelene.
terrene said:I don't appreciate the idea of treating scientific research of any kind with "skepticism" rather than with an open mind.
Iceman said:As a scientist, I think you should rethink this statement. Maybe read about the David Baltimore case. Even we are supposed to treat our findings with skepticism. We are constantly being reminded that most everything we think as fact will be proven false within 10 years.
karasu said:I honestly wish I could be an atheist sometimes.
Well duh.DaMan121 said:Agnostic about an undefined, unknowable, controller of the universe?
Verano said:Be an atheist for a week and see how does that turn out.
![]()
Having an open mind has little to do with skepticism or credulity.terrene said:Without knowing what type of "DNA evidence" is being referred to, who it might belong to, when it was from, or pretty much anything about Cameron's claims, I have no idea. Neither does Alucard. But that aside, even if there is truth to his findings, it will be denied tooth and nail by "counter-evidence" (specious, fabricated, or otherwise) until there's a mental "safety net" that makes believers feel comfortable again. So, whether it's shoddily-researched agitprop or the hard truth, it doesn't matter - this doc will have no impact at all.
I don't appreciate the idea of treating scientific research of any kind with "skepticism" rather than with an open mind.
fortified_concept said:Read the bible. That'll do the trick.
There's a difference between intellectual skepticism borne from being consistently proven wrong (which is more like keeping track of statistics than an outlook/philosophy) and an emotional need for "skepticism" due to a fear of having your beliefs trodden upon. Try to guess which one I'm talking about.Iceman said:As a scientist, I think you should rethink this statement. Maybe read about the David Baltimore case. Even we are supposed to treat our findings with skepticism. We are constantly being reminded that most everything we think as fact will be proven false within 10 years.
terrene said:There's a difference between intellectual skepticism borne from being consistently proven wrong (which is more like keeping track of statistics than an outlook/philosophy) and an emotional need for "skepticism" due to a fear of having your beliefs trodden upon. Try to guess which one I'm talking about.
Jesus, Superman, and Goku are all too similar.Cyan said:Holy crap. I just saw someone compare Jesus to Dragonball Z... and they were serious!