Quote from Jim on Twitter:
Seeing some speculation about this - no talks that may be happening have entertained the notion of me paying money to any accuser. None.
For anyone who is concerned that a settlement means Jim loses I can only say this, choosing the parameters of the end result via settlement can be favorable even if you are about to "win".
It is correct that Romine was about to have his case in a manner that would have prevented him from refiling on these particular claims. This wouldn't necessarily be a "win" for Sterling.
For example, it wouldn't have prevented Romine from refiling on different claims and it wouldn't mean that Sterling would have been awarded anything. Neither of those outcomes are great for Sterling.
So Jim has a lawyer, pays him, and in the end he's just going to settle after all this time?
Happy it's all over for Jim, shame he's gonna have to pay, but at least those parasites won't be taking anymore of his time or putting any unnecessary stress on the man. Think I'll support his Patreon for a few months.
Will he? Can't he file a counter suit to make the plaintiff pay for for the legal fees he caused?
I think Jim may counter-sue for compensation for his legal fees, but for nothing more. He'd get it, too. He's got a great lawyer.
Virtual Manslaughter incoming with their hit game "The Homicide Zone"?Case has run its course, ending the only place it ever could.
I guess it's time DH changed their name again.
It's obv a typo, why are you people freaking out? It makes no sense in the context of their post.