-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
KING KONG XBOX to XBOX 360 comparison pic
- Thread starter super-heated plasma
- Start date
Ganondorf>Link
Member
Wow, now that is a difference. As interested as I am in King Kong though, I'm not paying $400 just to see the game look a lot better. There should be gameplay advancements as well. But still, this is one of the few X360 games thats looks next-gen to me. Good to see Ubisoft trying.
I never fail to find these kind of statements intriguing...Ganondorf>Link said:
"It looks good, but not $400 good"
Who the hell buys a system for just one game? Hell, I'm trying to convince myself to pick up a Ps2 (slim) for $70 only for one game and I trying to rationalize it by telling myself that I "might" find something else I like, but I just can't do it.
Anyway, the above wasn't directed at you specifically anyway.. just my crazy ranting.
Back on topic, that's a huge difference. I wish the other cross generation games looked that good.
ToyMachine228
Member
I can't remember the last time I bought a game based on a movie license, but after playing King Kong on the 360, I just may.
Exactly.dorio said:
If I have a 360, why not go ahead and play the best version of the game?
On a side note, did anyone note whether or not the demo was 60 fps? I mean, there is no resaon why it shouldn't be, but the 360 has been disappointing me left and right with framerate...
Rummy Bunnz
Member
The Kong bits sure didn't look it. Couldn't tell during the FPS sections. It was too damn dark. Didn't play it myself, though. Just watched.dark10x said:
Oh COME ON, this is a PORT of a current gen game. Throw more shaders at it? If the XBOX360 is actually going to struggle with something like THIS, I fear for the future. Of course, I wouldn't blame the hardware itself in this case...dorio said:
With something like Gears of War, I suppose I could believe the "more detail instead of frames" argument, but there is no excuse here...
I should have guessed that this would be the case based on the poor performance of the PC demo and the terribly unstable framerate in every version of BG&E...
Doom_Bringer
Banned
Shompola said:
but don't you call sony fans "sfags" at OA? And here you go around calling everyone pathetic. I think you are pathetic.
Nope. And if I did, it was on OA as you allready implied, and what I do on OA should be addressed there or via PM. Infact you are incredible pathetic to bring up something on GAF that has nothing to do with GAF it in the first place. I know you are a secret admirer of me, but please keep love letters and such thru PMs instead of derailing other threads.
Particle Physicist
between a quark and a baryon
super-heated plasma said:Holy night and day, Batman! next gen am here!
the picture on the left looks bad in current gen standards as well. you sure that isnt the ngage version?
Particle Physicist
between a quark and a baryon
raYne said:
are you saying halo wasnt solely responsible for the sales of a whole lot a xboxs?
Nanta said:
ahh the good old "you are new so you must be dumb!"" argument. Way to go. Irony drips off your post. My "-_-" was aimed at the person who called me pathetic.
its just a well known fact that the next gen consoles, dont have next gen graphics. Almost all of them look mediocre, that can be done on a high end pc.
Jill Sandwich
the turds of Optimus Prime
It looks like Turok vs Turok+RAM pak. Nice dino though. Makes me want to play Tomb Raider 1 + 2 again for some reason.
Doom_Bringer
Banned
Shompola said:
:lol
I don't post or visit OA. Somebody posted your comments here. Its just funny that here you go around calling people pathetic if they make a minor appalling statement while you yourself go around calling Sony fans fags on another forum. Funny guy
Oblivion said:
*** Ages, terrible racist forum.
Doom_Bringer said:
So you have no idea how I behave on another board, yet you make conclusions about me based on what you think I behave on another board. That is rich...
I however have the luxoury to have read your miserable posts here on GAF and can make a correct conclusion of what type of a person you are.
And dont bring the other board here unless you want to get banned. And you should get banned based on your posts in this thread. Keep personal stuff private thru PMs!!
Doom_Bringer
Banned
Shompola said:
ok man I am sorry I shouldn't have done that. How are my posts miserable? Do I post too much in Sony threads? Am I a Sfag?
HomerSimpson-Man
Member
elostyle said:
No, I've seen the Xbox pics and they looked better than this, being blown up to near 720p makes it look like crap. Taking a 640x480 pic and blowing it up isn't pretty. It makes the game not that good looking even on current gen to begin with.
HomerSimpson-Man said:
That is true. But removing the jaggies and the overall pixelated look, the Xbox version is still looking noticeable worse than the Xbox 360 version. But still as has been mentioned, the Xbox 360 version isnt exactly what we are expecting from next gen games.
No, I WON'T drop it.Fuma said:
They are REGRESSING from last generation, do you understand that? Hell, with the ol' Dreamcast, ports from the PSX/N64 almost always resulted in 60 fps. Rayman 2 from Ubisoft benefitted greatly from 60 fps and so did almost every other board. There's no reason why something like this shouldn't run at 60 fps.
I have no power over any of this, but I'm not going down quietly. 60 fps was becoming more and more of a reality last gen, but now they are dropping back down in the "30-ish" area. No, that's not what I want to see happen. If you really think I'm trolling, fine, go ahead. However, it's something important to my experience and I will continue to fight for it as I've always done. It's not about 360, it's about the approach developers are taking towards developing for it...
I applaud the few developers that have decided to deliver 60 fps for the 360 launch, but I will not praise those who clearly don't care. In the case of something like PGR3 or Gears of War, I think I can forgive them for it as their games look incredible and ARE a bit early. However, mediocre looking titles will get no slack. With Madden 360, for example, we are seeing the return of 30 fps to major sports titles. Ever since NFL2k showed up for the Dreamcast, sports have been 60 fps. You're telling me that nobody should give a shit that the "next-generation" of sports is 30 fps?!
Kong is what I was hoping next gen would look like and most people who have seen it in motion would agree, but some just can't get over the fact that the game is coming out for this gen consoles. This, pgr3, and nbalive are the games that have impressed me the most as far as launch window games.Shompola said:
dark10x said:
Here is a thought. Why not wait till the devs get aquanted with the new hardware and are not so rushed to get out launch titles on time. You got to give them some time. If the trend still continues, by all means bitch and moan. But for now do us all a favor and chill. You do realize that these guys havent had finished kits for that long. How about cutting them some slack..at least for launch.
Im not going to get in a framerate debate with you. I've said my peace. Lets not let this thread get into another back and forth framerate war.
supermackem
Banned
Yeah i agress i have the xbox demo ubisoft sent out, and i have to say the xbox trex looks weak compaired to the 360 trex. The xbox pic doesnt looks as bad in the cave,but it isnt far off that its very ps2ie in the gfx department but i had a blast playing the demo. +1 Sale for the 360 version.
Why does the PC game look like shit and the X360 game look great. Unless those "PC" screens posted are really from the xbox version. But I dont understand why companies would release the pc version as a port of the xbox game. PC owners are the biggest graphics whores of them all, they flock to things like that. The game could get free publicity from being used in benchmarks on countless websites read by gamers. Instead they release crap. Makes me wonder what engine Madden 2007 on PC will be based on, PS2 or PS3?