House Bryant has no trueborn heir.
Shit, this made me chuckle.
Dark times are upon the denizens of Kingdom Enh'bee-ey'ah.
House Bryant has no trueborn heir.
Pretty much hit my two points in general fashion.It's a partnership. Don't join into one if you don't want to be partners with someone.
Kobe may lose a lot of money but it'll hurt him a hell of a lot less than the average guy who gets nailed in the divorce + child support. Financially, not much about his life will change so it's hard for me to worry that much about it.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/blog/ba...8217-s-wife-files-for-divorce?urn=nba-wp11952
![]()
I'd say it's a wrap for the Lakers 2011-2012 season no?
She was his wife. She bore him children. She raised those children. It was expected of her to not pursue her own career goals because she was his wife and he was the provider. She fulfilled that supportive role in the public eye while he achieved his goals. She stood by his side, before the entire nation, in the face of allegations that Kobe was a cheater at best and a rapist at worst. She continued to stand by his side for years, even after countless allegations and rumors of infidelity.
Vanessa, girl you better get your half.
She was a freaking music video chick when she met him lol. Yeah that really entitles her to half his fortune plus spousal support!
I honestly like Kobe. I just think the support he gets in this thread is comical. The most vehement support is from Lakers fans, which is expected, but still comical.
Fuckin' law, how does it work?
Exactly we're saying the law is ridiculous
Exactly we're saying the law is ridiculous
You completely ignored my points on the video game industry. You run a forum that is dedicated to the support of an industry that doesn't cure diseases. Plenty of game designer make a lot more money than researchers. You're okay with this?
Also, let's not forget all of the money Kobe helps bring in for other people. Janitors, ticket sellers, delivery men, security guards, etc feed their families because guys like Kobe can put a ball through a hoop. What about all of the federal and state taxes paid by these people and the businesses that employ them? Taxes that will help fund schools, medical research, and social programs for the needy. There's most certainly objective value there.
Well people who shoot balls through hoops or goals or whatever are paid in function of the money made by the sports industry they're in. Seeing as how they are the main attraction I find it only logical that they get that much money.Okay, let's be direct here: are you arguing that in an ideal world, people who shoot balls through hoops would be at the top of the economic heap, as they are now? That in an ideal world, basketball players deserve to earn millions, while teachers and educators and firemen and soldiers earn a tiny fraction of that amount? Just a yes or no answer, please.
that's kind of missing the point.Well people who shoot balls through hoops or goals or whatever are paid in function of the money made by the sports industry they're in. Seeing as how they are the main attraction I find it only logical that they get that much money.
Do you think all divorce settlements are ridiculous, or just this one?
She only stuck with his lying, cheating, scum-bag ass for years AFTER a rape scandal, and bore him children...but yeah, how DARE she divorce an upstanding gent like Kobe Bryant. And FUCK if she thinks she deserves anything...
Never change, GAF...
Yeah, hit reply too soon.
Okay, let's be direct here: are you arguing that in an ideal world, people who shoot balls through hoops would be at the top of the economic heap, as they are now? That in an ideal world, basketball players deserve to earn millions, while teachers and educators and firemen and soldiers earn a tiny fraction of that amount? Just a yes or no answer, please.
She doesn't deserve a cent.
Someone else mentioned this before but doesn't the difficulty of becoming a teacher vs. a pro athlete like Kobe factor into this? A rare commodity is always more valuable in terms of economics. I could get my teaching cert and become a teacher in a couple years, but I'll never be anything remotely close to an NBA baller.
It doesn't matter. He knew the law when he got married, so why have any sympathy for him?
Opiate, i like you but that is a stupid argument. In an ideal world, people will make what people are willing to pay for them. People are more willing to pay the the 5% of society who are exceptional athletes than the 90% of society who can be passable teachers.Okay, let's be direct here: are you arguing that in an ideal world, people who shoot balls through hoops would be at the top of the economic heap, as they are now? That in an ideal world, basketball players deserve to earn millions, while teachers and educators and firemen and soldiers earn a tiny fraction of that amount? Just a yes or no answer, please.
The reason this is true is that there is already so much money in being a basketball player, that only the very best basketball players can make it to the top. However, lots of the people who would theoretically be the very best teachers are not teachers at all, because there is far more money elsewhere.
You've got causality backwards; it isn't that "only the best" choose to be basketball players, so therefore they should earn a lot of money; basketball players already earn a lot of money, so millions of people are willing to do it, and out of that huge group, only the best make it. If you could earn millions being a teacher, then the competition for being a teacher would become incredibly intense and only the very best would make it there, as well.
Opiate, i like you but that is a stupid argument. In an ideal world, people will make what people are willing to pay for them. People are more willing to pay the the 5% of society who are exceptional athletes than the 90% of society who can be passable teachers.
There should be a rap... The fact that she'll make 9 figures from a divorce settlement is beyond Ludicrous.
You are describing the real world. I agree, in the real world, that is how the economy operates.
Also in the real world, Kobe's wife gets half his money.
Have you ever been in a relationship ?
What's your solution? Please suggest a good ratio or dollar amount that will fit all cases of divorce, thanks.
It's called a prenup.
Yeah because in the real world family law regarding divorce is fucking moronic, and morally should probably be changed.
And also in the real world our willingness to pay people who throw balls through hoops millions of dollars is moronic, and we should stop that.
And also our willingness to pay millions of dollars to people who play meaningless games is moronic, and morally should probably be changed.
Except that there is nothing moronic about it. People are willing to pay for it. No one is ripping money out of their bank account in the name of keeping societal values.
I'm going to ignore your question and instead defend my point. Obviously it wasn't such a big deal for her if she waited EIGHT YEARS to divorce him. The divorce may have not been about that at all. Maybe he wouldn't have to cheat if the divorce didn't so heavily favor his wife... he could have ended that shit and moved on.
Why isn't it capped at a ratio followed by a maximum dollar value after? Why does she need 180 million dollars?
There's nothing moronic about our marriage laws, then. People willingly enter in to marriage. Our societal values dictate that the spouse should get half the money upon divorce.
There's nothing moronic about our marriage laws, then. People willingly enter in to marriage. Our societal values dictate that the spouse should get half the money upon divorce.
What ratio? What maximum dollar amount?
What ratio? What maximum dollar amount?
Has anyone checked on Karl Malone? I hear he likes to hunt "little mexican girls".
Jerry buss said Kobe Braynt brings him in 100 million dollars per year, so I'd say his pay is more then fair.And also our willingness to pay millions of dollars to people who play meaningless games is moronic, and morally should probably be changed.
What are you trying to get at? We need to do research and post a solution with specific numbers if we think some woman shouldn't get 180 million for divorcing a rich man? I'm not in a position to know what type of help she, or other any other woman, needs to survive after the divorce but I know it's a lot lower than what she's getting.
Was Kobe worth 360 million when she married him? Hardly.
The bulk of that was money accumulated during the marriage. It is not on you or anyone else but the standing law to determine the "worth" of her contribution to the legally binding and mutual partnership known as marriage. This is so straightforward I don't see how anyone could be feeling sorry for Kobe or lashing out at Vanessa.
Except that there is nothing moronic about it. People are willing to pay for it. No one is ripping money out of their bank account in the name of keeping societal values.
He cheated, and she knew that. It obviously wasn't that big of a deal and she knew exactly what she was getting into in the first place, especially if she was a music video girl. That being said she probably just didn't enjoy being with him any more. They were together a long time and people can easily drift apart, especially people with the means and celebrity they have. So I say good luck to her on the ending of their relationship.
With that being said, she probably doesn't deserve the money she will likely get and spousal support should be outlawed. I just wonder besides whatever she will get outright what kind of ridiculous child support she will get. Child support is a really broken system. Needs to be thrown out completely and replaced with some sort of saner situation.
Because during a period of time when women were under represented in jobs, it made sense. That is no longer the case. Society has changed, and so should the rules. Women are equal, if not more successful in our economy and academics, yet when it comes to divorce we should view them as if they are second class citizens who get special treatment?
I should also add the societal views of sports have changed as well. The recent lockouts have lowered the future earnings potential of many athletes. The heyday of free agency and obscene contracts are largely gone in the NBA and the NFL. Reality caught up to them. When will it catch up to family court?