At no point did I say anything about him being a "guardian" of anything. I'm simply stating that as a consumer, he is entitled not to spend his money to see something. Regardless of the fact that he's an Internet personality or not, he's still a consumer, first and foremost.
I also have no idea who the list of "usual suspects" are. People are on this forum referring to one specific person, I am addressing the criticism on one specific person.
I just find it a bit hypocritical that, in a thread about a journalist receiving death threats, we're sharing pics and name calling an Internet personality for a valid opinion/ point of view. And you wonder why both continue to persist?
Your repeated attempts to defend him on the basis of his rights as a consumer show that you fundamentally misunderstand why people are annoyed at him in the first place.
He has every right not to see the movie, and, full disclosure, I'm not likely to see the movie either, because I don't think the trailer looks very good. However, I'm not attempting to make any statement about the movie to a wider audience, I'm just not planning to see it.
So, why does anyone care whether or not AVGN reviews the movie? Because prior to his video there had already been a year of backlash against the film because of the decision to cast women in the lead roles. In answer to your earlier question, the "usual suspects" are gamergaters, sad puppies, and every other angry person who makes a pastime of blaming everything they don't like in popular culture and politics on feminists and "SJWs". So when AVGN comes along in this already very hostile environment and says that he's not going to review
this remake because of a laundry list of excuses a lot of people don't buy it. They wonder why he had to make a statement at all, and they see a lot of people who were already shitting on the movie for its casting take him up as a figurehead, and they assume that he is making common cause with the Gaters and the Puppies and every other flavor of reactionary that has come seeping out of fandom and geek culture in the last three years. You were asserting that his reasons were valid, and I was saying that I don't necessarily believe that the reasons he states are his actual reasons for refusing to the see the movie and more importantly for making a widely shared and influential video about
why he is refusing to see it.
You continue to assert that he, as a consumer, is under no obligation to view the movie. And you're right! Absolutely, but you're also misunderstanding why people are criticizing him in the first place. Hopefully that provides a bit of context, and I'm sorry for being dismissive of you upthread, I assumed you were simply being tone-deaf and I should have given you the benefit of the doubt.
And with that being said, you make a good point about how we are all too ready to accept bullying when we don't like the target. I don't agree that ridicule and disagreement, or even questioning of his motives, rises to the level of death threats such as those that were the original subject of the thread, but we certainly can let ourselves get carried away when we perceive that someone is on the other "side."