Did you just call the PS5 a POS5? And of course 8-9TF rears it's ugly head again and the FUD about NVIDIA flops......At least try to hide it.....
So you heard about PS5 being about GTX 1070 level, when Leadbetter was saying XBONEX is around GTX 1070 level in 2017, nobody had any problem when he said that, but now, Sony is only going to deliver 1070 ballpark performance in 2020 after spending millions in R&D and engineering with AMD on a 7nm node? Just genius stuff from you as usual.....
You guys are as about transparent as the reflections in RTX'd BFV.........with lots of noise in the image, perhaps a noise fllter is required......
PS5 cannot be a between Vega 56 and 64......Navi will offer much better performance than that in 2019 at lower thermals and power consumption.......PS5 is going for 4k and also 8k resolution, with raytracing, to power PSVR2 at high rez and frames and next gen AAA games, so there's no way all they're going to do is to simply offer mid-way Vega Performance.......Everybody and their grandmother's are anlayzing Navi based on prior GCN renditions......The Navi arch has lots of optimizations and features that prior AMD offerings even on GCN never had, it's all about efficiency, getting more frames, less latency, better memory and bandwidth management, much higher IPC/instructions per CU etc......People have no info on the details of Navi, but are enamoured to call it's doom.........Every vendor has issues during development, nobody denies that, AMD particularly, they're certainly not oblivious, but there's no way an old arch which was just shooehorned to 7nm in Vega VII is the best AMD can offer on that node in 2019......Navi did not just start development, it's been in the pipeline for a bit and there has been very positive reports about it from AMD....
Everybody want to be the guy/s who has the scoop......The media said there was going to be no Vega 7, AMD announced it at CES....The media said Ryzen was going to be shown and announced at CES? No show.......The media said Navi is only going to be midrange??????? When Lisa Su constantly says that they will be competing on the high-end.....I mean who in their right mind would think that a new/refined arch is being worked on all these years and all they have to offer from it is a mid range product? It may be that AMD launches the lower end or midrange products first, but that's where their most successful cards are anyway.....rx 570 and 580's are the best bang for the buck in their price range.........Yet here, AMD is going to offer RX 580 perf at 75 watts and further kill the dead horse that is the 1650, they will offer RX 3070 that crushes the 1070/1070t/1660ti and 2060.........They will offer 3070XT that beats the GTX1080/2070 all at a lower power draw and better efficiencies, so what's all this hoopla about......
People want to talk about Turing being on shelves for 8 months already, but Turing only offered the same performance of pascal cards at a higher pricepoint and to date all we have are 4 RTX games, with very subpar delivery and performance.....1080ti had 11 Gb's, it competes with a new card with only 8Gb and that card is more expensive too....People said AMD needs to offer lower power consumption......AMD looks to offer cards with much lower power consumption at significantly lower prices than NV and they still want to complain..........Yes Jensen Huang and NV fans are really feeling the pinch right now.....It seems the 27th of May is rubbing them all the wrong way.......Stay tuned till then......