I don't understand this in response to my post.
You were pessimisric so you consider it something bad, As others I suppose
but looking at my portables and thinking about the different play styles o the Switch I am not that worried (nor thrilled )
I don't understand this in response to my post.
If this is true, it baffles me.
It's 2016. Decades ago we put men on the Moon and now a robot is driving around on Mars, but we still don't have good enough (small) batteries to last more than a few hours in a smartphone or handheld? Or is it just a matter of cost/pricing and we have the technology?
I can't believe they would be dumb enough not to let you power it though your car (or battery pack) in some fashion but... its nintendo.
Pessimism doesn't necessarily mean they think it is bad. He's just being realistic. And he's right, you shouldn't see/expect a huge improvement because the reasons you listed. 3DS and Vita. Battery technology has still not evolved drastically.You were pessimisric so you consider it something bad, As others I suppose
but looking at my portables and thinking about the different play styles o the Switch I am not that worried (nor thrilled )
You were pessimisric so you consider it something bad, As others I suppose
but looking at my portables and thinking about the different play styles o the Switch I am not that worried (nor thrilled )
I will be happy for my pessimism to be proven wrong, but I think you really need to brace yourself for the fact that the retail unit might not fare much better. I get it. As a sanity check I absolutely do think it's worthwhile to note that this is based on dev units and that things may be changed before the retail hardware is finalized. But one Tweet you are citing right now flat out says that the Ubi dev doesn't expect much improvement in the retail unit.
I suspect it will charge in the docking station via induction.
Nintendo is in a no-win situation.
Make the hardware powerful...folks complain about battery life.
Make the hardware battery efficient...folks complain about it's power.
I think the main reason you don't launch with a TV box is that up 'til now not a single one has proven overly successful. I don't think a single Apple TV or Android box has gone over very well. Shield TV hasn't. Vita TV certainly didn't make any noise. The Switch may very well not go over well either, but I think there's enough data out there now to support that a low end console isn't going to fly on its own.
"but...its nintendo." says the youth Flo Evans, who ignores that every single handheld allows you to charge on the go including the 3DS.
Nintendo is in a no-win situation.
Make the hardware powerful...folks complain about battery life.
Make the hardware battery efficient...folks complain about it's power.
It "lasts forever" cause you are surfing GAF and checking email, not playing Skyrim for 3 hours straight.
And Apple TV has sold 25 million units which isn't too shabby.
yes, the nintendo that didn't include an AC adapter with the n3DS and doesn't sell an official car charge kit. That nintendo.
Also I am nearly 40... buying this for my kids (maybe) lol.
It's less silly than expectations based on hopes and dreams though. Really, it's the least silly form of speculation.To both of you, extrapolating a company's moves in detail based on their past is a rather silly endavor.
Battery technology (and energy storage in general) has pretty much lagged most other fields.
Of course it is improving, but nowhere near at the same rate as everything else.
Nintendo is in a no-win situation.
Make the hardware powerful...folks complain about battery life.
Make the hardware battery efficient...folks complain about it's power.
yes, the nintendo that didn't include an AC adapter with the n3DS and doesn't sell an official car charge kit. That nintendo.
Also I am nearly 40... buying this for my kids (maybe) lol.
It's less silly than expectations based on hopes and dreams though. Really, it's the least silly form of speculation.
I get confused by brandings, but there was a different Apple TV product prior to that device that launched in... what 2014 or 2015? Like they had a set top box before they released the iOS box that connected to a TV to compete with Roku and Amazon Fire boxes right?
Could have reduced the screen size a little bit to around 5-6 inches, lower the resolution to 540p, and make it thicker(and more ergonomic) to allow a larger battery. People say there are no gimmicks this time with the Switch, but those detachable controllers are a gimmick and very few people are going to play with it like that, so I don't think it was worth the cost of better ergonomics and a good dpad.
The entire thread premise(or well the main topic) is based on one secondhand estimate based on one developer kit.
We are lacking context, details and the final consumer device.
Nintendo is in a no-win situation.
Make the hardware powerful...folks complain about battery life.
Make the hardware battery efficient...folks complain about it's power.
It's less silly than expectations based on hopes and dreams though. Really, it's the least silly form of speculation.
Exactly.
I'm shocked that a rumour is being taken as fact. It seems rumours only need to be treated as such when it suits someone.
Laura seems to be getting a free pass for some reason, when in the past regardless of someone's previous track record rumours were always treated as such.
At this stage we still don't know what the 3 hours battery life consisted of. Was it 3 hours of continuous gameplay? 3d game? Full brightness? Wi-fi enabled?
To me it reads as off the cuff remarks with no substance, "maximum battery life of three hours" "a mediocre battery life".
As I said earlier it's kinda like me throwing a random 20 mpg when talking about a car. It means nothing, what sort of driving get's 20mpg isn't that more important than the figure itself? Is that 20mpg cruising at 50mph on the highway?
Same principle applies here, would I really get 3 hours max if I was playing a game like downwell at minimum brightness with wi-fi off?
Or just keep portable and home separate.Nintendo is in a no-win situation.
Make the hardware powerful...folks complain about battery life.
Make the hardware battery efficient...folks complain about it's power.
Or just keep portable and home separate.
Wii U's problem is the tablet, and consumers ate the cost of that.
Nintendo's selling point is their exclusives, but they keep going for these gimmicks.
Or just keep portable and home separate.
Wii U's problem is the tablet, and consumers ate the cost of that.
Nintendo's selling point is their exclusives, but they keep going for these gimmicks.
Or just keep portable and home separate.
Wii U's problem is the tablet, and consumers ate the cost of that.
Nintendo's selling point is their exclusives, but they keep going for these gimmicks.
They had three generations of a closed-system Apple TV box that was still based on iOS under the hood, but was more limited. The new one added third-party apps + Siri + motion controller.
In the reveal trailer it really does look like the frame rate dropped when the guy switched from breath of the wild on the tv to the portable.
Nintendo has been d00md!1! for so long I'm pretty sure it's part of their DNA by now. Like, they were doomed all throughout my school years circa mid 90s.Don't forget Nintendo is perma-doomed, so it's not surprise they can't do anything right.
In the reveal trailer it really does look like the frame rate dropped when the guy switched from breath of the wild on the tv to the portable.
Do not worry about the framerate there. I'm surprised they showed it like that, but it is pretty obvious that all footage was just edited in after filming the scene.
.
Was it by choice or is it that big because that's the closest they can get of shrinking a home console to fit into your pocket?Could have reduced the screen size a little bit to around 5-6 inches, lower the resolution to 540p, and make it thicker(and more ergonomic) to allow a larger battery. People say there are no gimmicks this time with the Switch, but those detachable controllers are a gimmick and very few people are going to play with it like that, so I don't think it was worth the cost of better ergonomics and a good dpad.
Just out of curiosity, do you put any stock into the notion that a different version of the Tegra chipset might yield a significant boost? I don't know enough about mobile architecture myself to make heads or tails of this stuff. So I'm just anticipating the worst but hoping for the best.
These stuff are probably NDA'd to hell and back and for good reasons, I don't think the consumer product should be judged by the DevKit. Isn't Laura Dale trashing these NDA's, or is she doing this by proxy?