its just dark soul open word or it has something original ???
The plural of magnum opus is magna opera.The man is that good he has MULTIPLE Magnum Opus'
He didn't make DS2 tho. Better leave one stone for Elden Ringhow cud anyone doubt you
director for ds2?He didn't make DS2 tho. Better leave one stone for Elden Ring
director for ds2?
wiki says miyazaki did supervise ds2
Wiki is free by the way.
He was making Bloodborne and have nothing to do with piece of shit DS2
Yeah sure, i was merely talking about gameplay, the game is less replayable than other souls games.Sekiro is my least played from game. It is still a good game, but after i finished it I had no reason to replay it.
Supervising might just be giving OKs to designs. I remember Bloodborne leaking soon after the release of DS2, so I doubt he was heavily involved.wiki says miyazaki did supervise ds2
Has great combat, great exploration, great lore and great atmosphere. Also great designs in weapons, clothes, monsters, bosses... Great music and a great DLC.What's with people loving bloodborne? Game looked like an early PS3 game, runs like shit and seems like any generic rpg.
this is by far most retarded take I've seen on this forumWhat's with people loving bloodborne? Game looked like an early PS3 game, runs like shit and seems like any generic rpg.
Because it's a Sony Exclusive. Funny how these clowns also think Dark Souls is not as good as Bloodborne. LOL.What's with people loving bloodborne? Game looked like an early PS3 game, runs like shit and seems like any generic rpg.
What's with people loving bloodborne? Game looked like an early PS3 game, runs like shit and seems like any generic rpg.
What's with people loving bloodborne? Game looked like an early PS3 game, runs like shit and seems like any generic rpg.
This is a thread of joy and happiness. Get that console warring outta here pretty please.Because it's a Sony Exclusive. Funny how these clowns also think Dark Souls is not as good as Bloodborne. LOL.
Im hyped for this game but one thing disappointed me is the confirmation that there is no cities or npc, so its basically a game where you fight monsters and explore dead areas. When they said its going to be open world rpg, i thought it will have big city and villages and npcs to interact with and take quests and change the world..etc..etc. I also thought it will feature gameplay aspects other than just combat/fighting. But whatever im still hyped.
screw the consoles. this is a fromsoftware thread, and its fair to say Bloodborne isn't better than Dark Souls.This is a thread of joy and happiness. Get that console warring outta here pretty please.
noValhalla’s Yggdrasil was better *holds up purple flame shield*
I think they are both great, couldn't decide which one is better.screw the consoles. this is a fromsoftware thread, and its fair to say Bloodborne isn't better than Dark Souls.
wtfBecause it's a Sony Exclusive. Funny how these clowns also think Dark Souls is not as good as Bloodborne. LOL.
screw the consoles. this is a fromsoftware thread, and its fair to say Bloodborne isn't better than Dark Souls.
Oh i'm sorry i don't follow every sliver of info on a game that didn't show me anything to make interested in following it, IMO when you begin your announcement trailer with "a new world by Hidetaka Miyazaki and GRRM" you're basically telling the guy's involved in it's story.He did not write the story, he wrote the mythology of the world. Miyazaki literally stated in an interview that Martin's contribution was basically a Dungeon Master's Guide to the world of Elden Ring. Man, the people who have never read the interview make themselves really obvious.
Here's an article where it says Martin wrote the mythology, with Fromsoft doing the story, and says Martin basucally wrote a Dungeon Master's guide for the world: https://www.ign.com/articles/2019/0...volution-of-dark-souls-says-creator-a-e3-2019
So no, Martin's only infamously late because he puts side projects like Elden Ring over finishing Winds of Winter, becuase he no longer cares about A Song of Ice and Fire.
No, I simply said the video leaked was too blurry and like 10 seconds long that shows something or someone on a horses slashing something, my whole point is that i'm fascinated by the utter madness people have for a game that they have only truly seen one gameplay-less video of and a highly blurry leaked video that shows basically nothing and just lose their shit over it because it's made by From (who people actually think they've made nothing but gold all their existence IE 2009 to some) and is directed by Miyazaki.So you are saying the videos that are pretty much confirmed by those journos to be real gameplay are fake?
Okay..
how cud anyone doubt you
There will be no towns or settlements populated by non-enemy characters, Miyazaki never said anything about a lack of NPCs. I'm sure there will be more than enough of those with secrets and complex questlines, as always in his games but taken to the next level.Im hyped for this game but one thing disappointed me is the confirmation that there is no cities or npc, so its basically a game where you fight monsters and explore dead areas.
A leaked Elden Ring trailer is being circulated online | VGC
Leaked off-screen trailer footage shows the first gameplay of From Software’s Elden Ring…www.videogameschronicle.com
I prefer it that way. A highly populated world with lots of NPCs will go against the typical souls atmosphere of bleak and despair.There will be no towns or settlements populated by non-enemy characters, Miyazaki never said anything about a lack of NPCs. I'm sure there will be more than enough of those with secrets and complex questlines, as always in his games but taken to the next level.
Is this Elden Ring? Holy shit.