Vbrasa
Member
I'm not supporting or not supporting any sort of thing with this comment (I don't really know much about the podcast, cause I don't watch it), but I'm gonna blow your mind about something here. In our current era, whether or not she's playing a character or actually supports the views, whatever, but having a "Devil's Advocate" on a show for a debate churns views from multiple perspectives. It really shouldn't bother you as much as it is. Let people do what they want, as long as they aren't harming people.
If you have a debate show that is more of an echo chamber of thoughts, you're limiting your views, and by adding someone with a completely different mindset or viewpoint, you're drawing in more people to watch your show. It's called production, baybee.
It's why a lot of people stopped watching Game Grumps (not that I'm saying they're bad, I watch the odd episode every now and then) when Jon left, because Jon and Arin had differing points of view on games, where Dan didn't really play many games beyond the NES, so his views aren't really there. (Although, their views on life are very different, but that's offtopic)
If you have a debate show that is more of an echo chamber of thoughts, you're limiting your views, and by adding someone with a completely different mindset or viewpoint, you're drawing in more people to watch your show. It's called production, baybee.
It's why a lot of people stopped watching Game Grumps (not that I'm saying they're bad, I watch the odd episode every now and then) when Jon left, because Jon and Arin had differing points of view on games, where Dan didn't really play many games beyond the NES, so his views aren't really there. (Although, their views on life are very different, but that's offtopic)