I found your comment on exclusivity bumping up total sales interesting.
I recently gave up collecting vinyl as I was sick of getting excited for a release or finding out about a release after the fact only to realize I had no chance of securing one.
This culture of driving up profits by excluding others from enjoying a product is toxic and one I feel becomes even more counterintuitive as we move towards more media as service models. Movies, music and even games to some degree are lowering the barrier of entry so that the experience can be shared.
I wish you luck in your venture and this thread alone proves the demand is there I just don't wish to support it anymore.
Ok, we need to organize thoughts here and be a little blunt, frankly.
If you want convenience, the "move towards media as service" model, no stock limits, and no chance of a secondary market -- you DON'T want limited edition physical videogames, you don't want to collect vinyl. You want to download the immediately-available games and MP3s of said music.
And that's fine! But again, this is a boutique, limited business model by definition, and it needs to play off the risks of high print runs, with the demand generated by limited products, and if you want to play this game and get into this, you need to be aware of some basic economics of how this kind of thing works: When limited products sell out, there will be a secondary market for it at a higher price. It's COMPLETELY unfair to frame it as a "culture of driving up profits by excluding others". In the perfect world where demand is easy to estimate, it is the company's best interest to NOT limit at all, and produce precisely the number that will clear the market and generate zero scalpers, but also leave no leftover stock. That's nearly impossible to do.
They can certainly try and mitigate it, try to get the print run sizes right, limit to 1 per customer, change around how/when to print and order, but ultimately it's a tough problem to solve, and they can't possibly capitulate to everyone.
The purpose of their proposition, though, has been clear from the start right on their name.