If they had to really make a game about Yasuke (or a black person in feudal japan in general) more or less accurately it would be very offensive towards japanese culture/history since obviously how black people were perceived at the time, more like an attraction.
Something tells me it's not the road they're going to take. So in that sense yes it feels a little ridiculous as a choice because it probably serves very little purpose (not that the character will not have a specific background and all that).
I use "recent" in relative terms. As far as I know a lot of current tropes about samurai, ninjas, bushido and what else were "seeded" into Japanese popular culture in the late 1800s or so. With novels, theater productions, etc.
It's a bit like the myth of "karate" being the bread and butter of hand-to-hand combat in feudal Japan "for centuries", when in reality before the 1920 it was relegated as limited regional phenomenon in Hokkaido and then brought up to "national relevance" only because authorities in Japan fell in love with modern boxing and decided that they needed to have a national equivalent of it.
Well actually, it doesn't fit. None of the other assassins creed protagonists were real historical figures.But it does fit, Yasuke is real and fought and killed on the side of Oda Nobunaga, how can you say it doesn't fit when it happened and was recorded in history?
Moreover we're talking about a fictional historical setting where aliens exist, so it fits even more if Yasuke and his Portuguese master brought the Templars to isolated nation of Japan.
Yes, you've subverted expectations there.
If that's what you took from what I said, then, OK.
In practice, this might be cool.
On paper, it's like....
Aren't Japanese people a minority? It's 2023, and we're still taking the list of races recognized in the West as "black," "white," and "also white,"
Fun fact: the entire notion of “samurai” as depicted in dramas, modern literature, manga and anime (the often-honorable swordsman, entirely dedicated to swordsmanship and self-improvement) is an artifact, a recent invention. A romantic embellishment.
Most “historical” samurai were paper pushers of questionable military competence and dubious martial prowess.
Yeah kinda hard as a 6-foot-plus black man to hide in a crowd of Japanese people.Aren't you supposed to be blending in with the crowd?🕵
Sure. Except, people who have a genuine problem with the “wokeness” (god I hate that word, regardless of who uses it) of a game tend to express the nature of their dissatisfaction. When that dissatisfaction stems from “Oh no! A black man!” or whatever, they will tend to hide behind their “Boo! Woke!” rallying cry.
Diversity is great, for a whole range of reasons. Representation, obviously, but also increased market share, more easily distinguishable characters and factions, variety of aesthetic, the provision of visual cues for setting / enemy capabilities / story progression, etc., etc. None of these is the “agenda pushing” that these chumpos tend to whine about, unless that agenda is the capitalist agenda of “selling more games and making more money.”
Now, if someone has a problem with, say, the skin colour of a character, they can talk about issues of historical accuracy, or… uh… I really can’t think of any other problem someone could have with skin colour in a game, but whatever — and they can balance those issues against the myriad gameplay and target demographic and aesthetic and economic reason for making that choice and, by all means, try to have an intelligent conversation. Or, they can tie their racial fragility to that one word because they have no actual argument to make because - yep - they’re racist.
Is there an option i’m missing here?
- Oh my god, Assassin's Creed in Japan. Finally I can be a Japanese ninja or samurai.
Ubisoft: here's the only black samurai we can find specially just for you.
Well actually, it doesn't fit. None of the other assassins creed protagonists were real historical figures.
Jesus Christ some of you need to get a grip and touch some grass with the "woke" nonsense with this news. There was a whole ass Tom Cruise movie about a white samurai called "The Last Samurai" in 2003 long before "woke" allegedly took over modern culture. This is not a new storyline. If anything this is a lazy copy of an old theme.
There are MANY games to go after when it comes to historical accuracy or people being in the right place at the right time, but AssCreed is not even REMOTELY one of them. They had a whole DLC about King George Washington.
Yet now everyone wants to shit their little britches because there is a black samurai? Something that has been prevalent in Japans own media for decades? For example a manga written by a Japanese artist by the name of Takashi Okazaki in 1998?
Afro Samurai - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Oh and there was an ACTUAL black warrior in the documented history of Japan?
Yasuke - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Get out of here people. There is more than enough actual culture and history behind this for it to be a thing in a random video game rather than it just be labeled some kind of "woke" nonsense by people who don't know what they are talking about.
At least pretend to do research before you throw a titty fit lol
You also have Rise of the Ronin coming out as well. If this is indeed true, I'm looking forward to their take on it.We already have that with Ghost of Tsushima. Could very well be Ubisoft is looking to differentiate their game from GoT which borrows many gameplay elements from AC already. Nothing wrong if you would rather the game be about Japanese samurais, but I don't understand how anyone can assume the choice to base the story on Yasuke has to be because of identity politics. To me, there has to be more to it than what we know before we can throw out the "woke" card.
Yeah, there are gamers that dont want to play with a woman as caracter, and now there will be gamers that dont want to play as a black samurai, you can wait for "meeeh this is woke as Hell", you can wait for the racial remarksand a remarks that a black samurai is not possible in Japan. But there was a black samurai in Japan. whatever decission a developer makes there are always people that dont like that...it is what it is.....If that is supposed to be Yasuke, I think we can narrow down the setting to 16th Century. Oda Nobunaga's time. I think it's pretty cool, but I can already see the "controvery" surrounding this miles and miles away.
Blending in the crowd is so 2010. You're a Medjay, Spartan and Viking, why do you need to blend? Just go Raaahhhhh!Aren't you supposed to be blending in with the crowd?🕵
Man, as cool as Yasuke is, they took 17 years to make a mainline AC in Asia to just put a non-native protagonist?
Don’t like that.
I would prefer a ninja to a samurai, as I've said before in this thread. I'm just pointing out that, while yes Yasuke is a real black historical figure during the period that the game is rumored to take place, he doesn't fit with the other protagonists of assassins creed games.So you would totally be fine with him being black if he wasn't a historical figure but a made-up one like the rest of the protagonists?
Yeah, but he'll look like this after Ubisoft artists decide he needs to look less aggressive and more like Lenny Kravitz...He looks absolutely badass (unless that's just AI art in which case he still looks absolutely badass).
Ubisoft actually cares about representation only gaming company actually has tons of middle East playable characters in gaming
It could be that their goal was to differentiate themselves from the likes of Ghost of Tsushima and (perhaps more importantly) the unreleased Rise of the Ronin, and after checking the history books they managed to find a black dude who was actually there (let's not pretend Ubisoft cares about "representation" I really don't think they do).
lol.....this isn't "woke" anything.
So just because there was one famous African samurai in history, this can't be woke?
Wrong. It's still woke. Its part of Ubisofts very obvious agenda. What percentage of samurais were black?
Indeed.As a half japanese person born and raise in america, people need to stop comparing this to nioh, because yeah the main character in nioh made me roll my eyes pretty hard. You know the only reason they used that main character was to try to get more sales. Even in Japanese games and anime, there aren't a ton of asian protagonists even though it can work well, something like samurai champloo was amazing. Japanese devs were surprised they used jin in ghost of tsushima and he was great.
THAT BEING SAID, peoples arguments have convinced me that yeah, ubisoft probably needs to get out of the way of ghost of tsushima 1/2 and rise of the ronin and do something different. The idea is solid, but uh, let's see about the execution.
Honestly, I think that’s a game that should be made in Japan,
That's some mighty big expectations. Let alone coming from Ubisoft.Some thoughts...
1. I think this could turn out really cool and am intriqued by the prospect of the fish out of water story.
2. Considering how long Ive been waiting for this I would have prefered the traditional japanese Ninja approach.
3. Looking at the casting trend in film and Games as of late mixed with what Ive read of these companies "mission statements" and of what I know about the ESG score requirements mixed with Ubisoft's finacial situation lately I find it curious that so many are so quick to swat away claims of idenity politics playing a role? Like its a reasonable assumption. You dont have to be crazy or some die hard anti-wokester to have questions here.
4. Even if this decision is driven by an agenda it may very well turn out to be the one time when wokeism leads to something interesting.
True true. Every since 2009+ my attitude toward Ubisoft in general has been never forgive never forget. I def dont expect much from AC thats for sure.That's some mighty big expectations. Let alone coming from Ubisoft.
Nice post, as i know nothing about ancient Japan or how you call that period, i wonder how the world would look like, is it something alike the GoT world? like many open areas with lot of flowers and such and only tiny settlements or are we going to have cities or something like that, very interesting to see.The Sengoku period is very apart from the Kamakura period. The protagonist of GoT acted like some shinobi, Yasuke was pure samurai. Also guns were very used, making Japan the largest place with guns in the world at the time.
Villain is British. Just my guess.I don't care if the protagonist is black or white or Asian
I just hope the main villain will not be a non binary shogun
Will we get to pick or will it be like syndicate, and we have to use both? If we can pick, yes problem solved. If it's more like syndicate I'm out, as I hated the thug story missions.I mean, when they announced the game, the first art piece was of the female ninja protagonist. And we knew about the black Samurai and her way before the reveal. So...? What's the shock? If you don't want to play as him, you don't have to. Pick the shinobi girl, problem solved.