They don't need it but are constantly hounded with questions about game length, as if that is the priority. So tired of hearing and seeing "how long is this game??". It's a fair question, but I don't like the idea of dev's prioritizing game length on account of fan feedback.I can relate to people who feel some narrative driven games beeing to long. Personally speaking GoW Reboot was 3 hours to long and Part 2 was about 5 hours to long.
Developers have this approach of filling their games with unnecessary content to justify the price. They don't need it.
Literally every single review complained about how long the last AC was.No it doesnt. Learn to recognize and appreciate greatness when you see it. Its polished to perfection.
Where are these complaints for bland repetitive open world drivel like Ass Creed?
Why?I highly doubt you actually know how the game ends.
Brainless? You’ve absolutely just made pure shit up about some playtesters and their opinions and how it supposedly has the developers changing and twisting scenes from the first. Did they? Did theyyyy? Well I’ve found no info, no article talking about this. So you just lied? So you want to talk about people will “soon be in here defending it” - well same goes for people like you who are straight in here with the basically absolute weird nonsense. Yes it’s abundant Abby has her haters - but from what you say, if players still hated her, whys she in the game still? Sounds like an idea a developer would move on from, no?The playtesters still hated her so they kept twisting what happened in TLOU1 to make it fit, changing scenes and adding stuff.
Big awful mess but it worked on some brainless twits and they will be here soon defending it (if they are not here already).
Let’s be real - you’d all be absolutely whining how it should have been part of the main game. And you’ll have your “I’m not paying Sony again for practically Last of Us 2.5 - this is miles morales all over again!”Abby's campaign should've been an expansion like Lost Legacy.
Thankfully the rest of the game is not a bunch of mini open world areas.I didn’t really like the Seattle section either. I wish modern games would stop trying to make EVERYTHING more open. The gameplay should fit the narrative here. Linear.
Worst than UC4. In fact, UC4 pacing totally destroyed the game inself.
Lost Legacy on the other hand is so much better with the pacing.
Let’s be real - you’d all be absolutely whining how it should have been part of the main game. And you’ll have your “I’m not paying Sony again for practically Last of Us 2.5 - this is miles morales all over again!”
Tell me that wouldn’t happen
Lost Legacy had it - it was abundantly clear that game started as DLC but became a really great expansion - still had daft people exclaiming it’s just “more of Uncharted 4”
This is why we can’t have nice things
Anyone else remember how FUCKING AWESOME this scene was
I hated the flashbacks, especially the museum one.cool parts where the museum flashback (which is peak movie game, but it was cool) and one encounter in a residential area against dudes and doggos.
Well they have almost no gameplay, but for me that one was nice cause ot reminded me of the first one.I hated the flashbacks, especially the museum one.
Literally every thread regarding open world games, Ass Creed is probably the most commonly used nickname for a franchise for a reason.No it doesnt. Learn to recognize and appreciate greatness when you see it. Its polished to perfection.
Where are these complaints for bland repetitive open world drivel like Ass Creed?
The constant return to Seattle, as if the hike was a 15 minute affair... it made no sense (they also apparently never met any of the new factions over the 5 years).Well they have almost no gameplay, but for me that one was nice cause ot reminded me of the first one.
They don't need it but are constantly hounded with questions about game length, as if that is the priority
Brainless? You’ve absolutely just made pure shit up about some playtesters and their opinions and how it supposedly has the developers changing and twisting scenes from the first. Did they? Did theyyyy? Well I’ve found no info, no article talking about this. So you just lied? So you want to talk about people will “soon be in here defending it” - well same goes for people like you who are straight in here with the basically absolute weird nonsense. Yes it’s abundant Abby has her haters - but from what you say, if players still hated her, whys she in the game still? Sounds like an idea a developer would move on from, no?
Doesn't the game have like a 70% completion rate?
Brainless? You’ve absolutely just made pure shit up about some playtesters and their opinions and how it supposedly has the developers changing and twisting scenes from the first. Did they? Did theyyyy? Well I’ve found no info, no article talking about this. So you just lied? So you want to talk about people will “soon be in here defending it” - well same goes for people like you who are straight in here with the basically absolute weird nonsense. Yes it’s abundant Abby has her haters - but from what you say, if players still hated her, whys she in the game still? Sounds like an idea a developer would move on from, no?