• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Marathon approaching 15k CCU low (sponsored by coachmcguirk91 - still having a blast)

f4c51e4707a146c0e257fc45f5382fd0.jpg

eZWRm6MYJ49PQwiYKG7Wzj.jpg


The skins / Runners in Marathon are great. The game isn't failing because of its art style.
I bite.
Marathon is in the #omega genre and it has great gameplay.
The artstyle is great too and "real" pvp gamers don't care about "looks" anyway.

Why is Marathon failing exactly? In your opinion.
 
Why is Marathon failing exactly? In your opinion.
Hars to really say considering how big and ambitious the genre is. I think Marathon is too difficult to surf the wave.

- Skill gap too high
- Squad fill is awful
- Cryo Archive not compelling enough

Marathons ceiling will innately be limmited due to it's arena shooter DNA but it's floor is higher than what we saw from S1. Marathon is great if you're a higher skill than the average and can consistently play with friends. It's much choppier for everyone else.
 
Last edited:
Hars to really say considering how big and ambitious the genre is. I think Marathon is too difficult to surf the wave.

- Skill gap too gay
- players are elitist assholes
- Cryo Archive was made for butt plug wearing bitches

Marathons ceiling will innately be limmited due to it's arena shooter DNA but it's floor is higher than what we saw from S1. Marathon is great if you're higher skill than the average player and can consistently play with friends. It's much choppier for everyone else.

Fixed

335OrXF0.gif
 
Last edited:
Cart before the horse.

Nobody buys or plays a PvP game because it has cool skins.

You buy cool skins because you play the PvP game.

The PvE mind is a rigid one.

But to sell people on the game and gameplay you have to get them in the door. How many people have to tell you they think Marathon looks like crap before you believe them?

I don't think it looks like shit personally, but enough people have told me that they do that I believe they feel that way subjectively. The sales numbers back up their statements about the game being unappealing.
 
Game is simply too good for players.

That's how different the OmegaGenre is, a game without players.
WG98FWeqYy3IdWc6.png
LOL. Division 2 came out so long ago, PS5 and SX werent even out yet. Apex Legends just released. Lebron James hadnt even finished his first year on Lakers yet. And covid wouldnt happen for another year!

And it was first sold on PC in the Epic store and UBI launcher for years. It didnt come to Steam until 2023. Yet even leftover Steam sales have higher CCU than Marathon.
 
Last edited:
How many people have to tell you they think Marathon looks like crap before you believe them?
If I'm at a flat earth society convention, I don't start believing in a flat earth after the 100th person tells me it's flat.

The types of people who say the art style limited Marathons success almost always fall into one of two categories...

1. Weird parasocial relationship with Bungie.
2. Not a PvP player.

I've never heard anyone on Marathon say they're thinking of quitting the game, or they can't get their friends to play, because of the art style. Y'all just don't get PvP culture.
 
Top sellers list. An ARC Raiders costume set is selling more $$$ than all of Marathon. On the plus side, at least Marathon is selling more than a 9 year old hunting game.

Ap4MUfQQDyyOGTwb.jpg
 
Last edited:
If something that minor goosed the numbers, imagine the goosing that will happen for S2 launch...

203ef2e4c44fee83e65d0b34a89dff1b.gif
Not Bad Kind Of GIF by MOODMAN

If I'm at a flat earth society convention, I don't start believing in a flat earth after the 100th person tells me it's flat.

The types of people who say the art style limited Marathons success almost always fall into one of two categories...

1. Weird parasocial relationship with Bungie.
2. Not a PvP player.

I've never heard anyone on Marathon say they're thinking of quitting the game, or they can't get their friends to play, because of the art style. Y'all just don't get PvP culture.
I've always thought the artstyle was chosen as a way to differentiate the game from Destiny 2.

They have a lot of biomes in that game and its running on the same engine. The decking out in neon gives Marathon a super distinct look vs D2 and allows them to avoid comments like "this is just a mode from D2."

It appears so ostentatious because anything else would have drawn those comparisons to D2. They couldn't really give Marathon the graphics bump over D2 they needed but they could mess with the colors. Personally I don't think it matters as a turnoff reason, but I do think a mil-sim artstyle would have potentially brought in an additional audience. I just don't think they could pull that off in this engine nor was it ever really considered. Bungie have never been a mil-sim style dev it's always sci-fi with Bungie.
 
Last edited:
If I'm at a flat earth society convention, I don't start believing in a flat earth after the 100th person tells me it's flat.

The types of people who say the art style limited Marathons success almost always fall into one of two categories...

1. Weird parasocial relationship with Bungie.
2. Not a PvP player.

I've never heard anyone on Marathon say they're thinking of quitting the game, or they can't get their friends to play, because of the art style. Y'all just don't get PvP culture.

Ok let's try the opposite line of thought then, why didn't Marathon sell better? Not just to the people in this thread, but gamers as a whole.

- Is there a grand conspiracy where all gamers just actually hate good games?
- Did this Neogaf thread and a few youtubers single handledly dethrone the next Fortnite?
- Is the entire world composed entirely of bitter Ex-Destiny players like me?
- Is there a grand conspiracy against extraction shooters that somehow skipped Arc Raiders?

I have seen a ton of people (Not all to be fair) say "Hey the art style isn't working for me.", maybe expressing it a little less eloquently but the sentiment is the same. I can't prove this 100% but it's the feedback I'm seeing from people about a subjective opinion they hold. Short of mind reading I don't have any information that would counter that theory... If I had evidence that these people all received $1000 deposits from the Anti-Bungie Foundation, I'd take them less seriously but that doesn't seem to be the case.

I love a lot of niche stuff and am super used to people not caring about the things I love dearly. It does not surprise me in the slightest that Marathon doesn't click with a lot of people.
 
Last edited:
I've never heard anyone on Marathon say they're thinking of quitting the game, or they can't get their friends to play, because of the art style. Y'all just don't get PvP culture.

I showed the game to one of my Hunt playing friends, he looked at it for about 15 seconds and said "Nah, I ain't playing that".

He clearly didn't make that decision because he ain't into the genre, or even much due to the gameplay, what can you really tell of it in 15 seconds other than what it looks like. LEGO puke.
 
The reason I feel the art style is a huge portion is because most people aren't online getting into the minutiae of bungie and how they're all just a bunch of lgbtq1iafages and steal art and all that, most people I don't feel knows about that tbh.

But what they do know is they see a new game and it's ugly ass Characters and ugly fucking ui, ugly guns, ugly everything and then hear what kind of game it is and say nah, fuck that. That is imo the hierarchy of how this goes.
 
Ok let's try the opposite line of thought then, why didn't Marathon sell better? Not just to the people in this thread, but gamers as a whole.

- Is there a grand conspiracy where all gamers just actually hate good games?
- Did this Neogaf thread and a few youtubers single handledly dethrone the next Fortnite?
- Is the entire world composed entirely of bitter Ex-Destiny players like me?
- Is there a grand conspiracy against extraction shooters that somehow skipped Arc Raiders?

I have seen a ton of people (Not all to be fair) say "Hey the art style isn't working for me.", maybe expressing it a little less eloquently but the sentiment is the same. I can't prove this 100% but it's the feedback I'm seeing from people about a subjective opinion they hold. Short of mind reading I don't have any information that would counter that theory... If I had evidence that these people all received $1000 deposits from the Anti-Bungie Foundation, I'd take them less seriously but that doesn't seem to be the case.

I love a lot of niche stuff and am super used to people not caring about the things I love dearly. It does not surprise me in the slightest that Marathon doesn't click with a lot of people.
It's a game which manages to be divisive on many fronts, which creates a multilayered filter:

- GAAS is divisive
- High difficulty is divisive
- The art style is divisive
- Dense, unintuitive UI and systems are divisive
- The genre is divisive
- Priced live-service is divisive
- Even FPS is a bit divisive in 2026

Even if each of these issues splits gaming audiences 50/50 it won't be the same 50/50 every time. Your audience has to be people who like intensely sweaty, paid-for, live-service, FPS extraction shooters with a distinct neon art-style, a steep learning curve and a sci-fi setting. It's a very specific audience. Bungie haven't made an extraction shooter that would to appeal to pretty much anyone who likes extraction shooters (small audience though it already is), they've made something which likely only appeals to a small number of that already small number.

Compare this to ARC Raiders: it's a more chill, third-person shooter, with a fairly run of the mill art style and post-apocalyptic setting, friendlier onboarding and fewer high-pressure systems that demand continued engagement. Most ordinary people can jump into ARC and have a few hours fun without much trouble, Marathon feels designed to actively filter all but the most specific niche of players.
 
Last edited:
The game was hated and that is the reason the server slam was so small.

However, the reason so many left between the server slam and launch and between launch and now is probably the gameplay loop.
 
The game was hated and that is the reason the server slam was so small.

However, the reason so many left between the server slam and launch and between launch and now is probably the gameplay loop.
Game looks like ass
Gameplay/Gunplay is a reskinned D2 with heavy iron boots on(recycled enemies)
Maps are pathetic
Art is rainbow trash
ARC is much better graphically and gameplay
$40 is outrageous when you could just but better games in the genre
 
I honestly don't even know which game you're referring to here? Rainbow Six Siege? Rust? Marathon? Your post here could be addressing any of them.
I assumed the inclusion of the quote in which you are talking specifically about Marathon and refer to Marathon by name would be enough of a clue even for you.

Was your launch prediction so far out with those other games too?
 
It's a game which manages to be divisive on many fronts, which creates a multilayered filter:

- GAAS is divisive
- High difficulty is divisive
- The art style is divisive
- Dense, unintuitive UI and systems are divisive
- The genre is divisive
- Priced live-service is divisive
- Even FPS is a bit divisive in 2026

Even if each of these issues splits gaming audiences 50/50 it won't be the same 50/50 every time. Your audience has to be people who like intensely sweaty, paid-for, live-service, FPS extraction shooters with a distinct neon art-style, a steep learning curve and a sci-fi setting. It's a very specific audience. Bungie haven't made an extraction shooter that would to appeal to pretty much anyone who likes extraction shooters (small audience though it already is), they've made something which likely only appeals to a small number of that already small number.

Compare this to ARC Raiders: it's a more chill, third-person shooter, with a fairly run of the mill art style and post-apocalyptic setting, friendlier onboarding and fewer high-pressure systems that demand continued engagement. Most ordinary people can jump into ARC and have a few hours fun without much trouble, Marathon feels designed to actively filter all but the most specific niche of players.

I agree with this assessment largely. I'd even add a few reasons to it like a lack of trust with Bungie specifically.

I more so just wanted to know what Mr Boxes thinks directly because he's rejected the art argument and compared us to flat earthers. He's gone from this will be the biggest game ever at launch to backtracking about how actually the game has issues right now but it'll actually peak at the launch of season 2, trust. The problem with this line of thought is that you need to play the game first to know all those problems exist. I'm just trying to understand why he thinks the launch went so poorly or who he thinks the enemy is. It can't possibly be this thread because this thread didn't exist until launch day.
 
Last edited:
The types of people who say the art style limited Marathons success almost always fall into one of two categories...

1. Weird parasocial relationship with Bungie.
2. Not a PvP player.

You are deluding yourself if you really believe that. The types of people who dislike Marathon's artstyle is much broader and wider than you listed.
 
You are deluding yourself if you really believe that. The types of people who dislike Marathon's artstyle is much broader and wider than you listed.
You either fall into slot 1 or 2.

You avoid answering my question about why the art styles of Fortnite, Valorant, Rust, League of Legends, and PUBG didn't hold those games back...but Marathon, which launched looking better than all of them, somehow hurt its chances?
 
Honestly, Steam doesn't tell you the whole picture of Division 2 because of how it used to be sold on PC for so long.

That game actually has way more players than even Destiny 2 and Marathon combined, honestly.

They are working on cross-play, but even Countdown, which is a big group thing you can queue for always had/has instantaneous queues at all hours of the day when I've played and thats PS4/PS5 population only. And very, very rarely would you see the same name in your group.

Very popular game.
 
I agree with this assessment largely. I'd even ad a few reasons to it like a lack of trust with Bungie specifically.

I more so just wanted to know what Mr Boxes thinks directly because he's rejected the art argument and compared us to flat earthers. He's gone from this will be the biggest game ever at launch to backtracking about how actually the game has issues right now but it'll actually peak at the launch of season 2, trust. The problem with this line of thought is that you need to play the game first to know all those problems exist. I'm just trying to understand why he thinks the launch went so poorly or who he thinks the enemy is. It can't possibly be this thread because this thread didn't exist until launch day.
He thinks other people are flat-earthers? Holy projection, Batman.
 
On Sunday/Monday I expect a slightly larger dropoff that we originally expected as people who came back from the new queue leave again.

It's been hovering around 1.5k and 2k less WoW all day, so the uptick in the new queue plus Cryo isn't been doing much to begin with.

Edit: Ofcourse, we need to see how it peaks today to see the definitive WoW change.

Edit 2: It's out of the top 200 best sellers list on Steam.
 
Last edited:
The art style is for sure a part of that initial rejection by the market I was talking about, and has the added disadvantage of making it difficult for themselves to sell cosmetic mtx.

People were not weighing whether to buy the game or not at launch and deciding not to because of some obscure mechanical detail. Retention and word of mouth post-launch may be able to be coped away with such trivialities; the initial rejection by the market cannot be.
 
As I always say, you can only have one first impression.
That is Marathon's biggest problem. It stumbled a bit out of the gate and there are some people that just won't come back.
I mean just scanning at the extraction games, arc is the only one with a respectable number I'm seeing. The rest are shit, just going by steam.
Most escape from tarkov players use the bsg launcher instead of steam, so it is really big outside of steam.
 
Last edited:
You avoid answering my question about why the art styles of Fortnite, Valorant, Rust, League of Legends, and PUBG didn't hold those games back...but Marathon, which launched looking better than all of them, somehow hurt its chances?

That is your very subjective opinion. I would wager the majority of gamers do not agree with you on that. 😎
 
Top Bottom