Mario and friends make an ace return in Mario Tennis Ultra Smash for the Wii U! Download the game from the Nintendo e-Shop now to receive a free download of Mario Tennis for the Nintendo 64!
Select Mario Tennis for the Nintendo 64 from the Wii U menu to access the rest of the modes in the game. You can play the exhibition mode in HD by selecting Mario Tennis Ultra Smash from the same menu. However, please note that some of the characters and courts will not be available in this mode.
I believe online you can't play with friends whatsoever.
What a fucking joke.
Even with no content, if they managed to deliver a somewhat competent online mode I would be all over this as all I really ever wanted since Power Tennis was an exact copy of that game with online play.
But I can't even match up with friends? The fuck is this shit, Nintendo?
So how barebones is the online play?
Private matches with friends? Can I play with a friend and take on other doubles teams? How comprehensive are the stats and ranking system?
Footage of all the unlockable courts in the game and 27mins of pure gameplay. Should give you a good idea of what to expect: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5fSGP6tDkY
Thanks for sharing. It looks good, colorful, smooth, etc. Probably plays really well too. Just a shame about the half-assed content. If I ever see it for around $20 I might scoop it up.
So, Nintendo sucked this year. Must have moved everything good to NX
- I wonder if they're releasing an incomplete game, and then will add modes later like Splatoon.
- Or if it's just to get the game out and forget about it.
I guess I'm hoping for the latter, so other stuff can be worked on...
But still, if enough was added, I could buy the game later at around 20-30 bucks.
So, Nintendo sucked this year. Must have moved everything good to NX
So, Nintendo sucked this year. Must have moved everything good to NX
Wii U
Kirby and the Rainbow Curse
Splatoon
Yoshi's Woolly World
Super Mario Maker
Xenoblade Chronicles X
3DS
Legend of Zelda Major's mask 3D
Xenoblade Chronicles 3D
Pokemon Super Mystery Dungeon
Yo-Kai watch
Animal Crossing Happy home designer
Those are just the nintendo published games there was some great 3rd party 3ds games released this year also plenty to enjoy on nintendo hardware this year.
I'll add Affordable Space Adventures and Code Name STEAM.
I'll add Affordable Space Adventures and Code Name STEAM.
So, Nintendo sucked this year. Must have moved everything good to NX
Thought 3DS was pretty great.So, Nintendo sucked this year. Must have moved everything good to NX
i was hesitant to list that game despite me loving since it for some reason has a bad rep![]()
^^Yeah, pretty much. They just wanted a title that might sell a few units on name alone
In total, this year hasn't been that much worse than last year.
It only seems that way because Bayo2, Smash, and MK8 are all Game of the Generation level. Assuming you mean Wii U.
This year has had good entries in several franchises:
Mario Maker, Kirby, Yoshi, Xeno, Splatoon,
If it had star fox it would be closer to last year.
They released a fresh new MP Shooter IP, a worthy sequel to Yoshis Island and a competent Mario Editor. Xenoblade X is also coming in a two weeks (plus Paper Jam for Europe).
And BoxBoy!
I love Mario Maker and Yoshi, but 2014 was way better. MK8, Smash, Bayo, Donkey Kong, and Captain Toad were all bangers. I'm excited for Xenoblade, but I tend to fall on the side of "Kirby kind of sucks".
3DS also had a way better year last year. Pokemon and Bravely Default what's uuuuuup.
I was looking for an OT but there's only this and a negative impression thread. =D
Anyway transcribed the staff list (glad that wasn't cut as well =P) and it's essentially the same as for Mario Golf World Tour. So either Camelot is essentially fed up doing those tennis games (golf clearly surpassed tennis in creativity quite some time ago), or they got way too little time (though they used to be more efficient with it), or there will be a slight update in time for the later Japanese release in January (not holding my breath).
Been playing with a group of friends for almost 9 hours straight, even the ones that don't play video games are loving it, besides the lack of content, I'm enjoying this game A LOT, in no way it deserves anything below 6.
I miss power shots and the gimmick courts, but I prefer the new gimmicks, and the solid mechanics are very freekin satisfying, I can definitely recommend it, even the net code is rock solid.
It's a great party game, just like every other multiplayer Nintendo game. I don't think anyone is denying that. In that department it's as good as previous entries.
The lackluster modes, features, online, roster etc are legitimate concerns thus really low scores are completely justified.
I would understand why the game has general low scores, but rating it as low 3 or 4? IMO that is not justified unless the game is compleately boring or broken, the game doesn't deserve such low scores unless you bought the game for purely single player purposes.
This game is the equivalent of Mario Kart 8 (A game which has tight controls and great graphics) having one figure 8 circuit to race on with different material, a mode with only mega mushrooms, a mode with items and a mode without. Oh and you can play online but not with your friends, and the roster is smaller than Mario Kart 64. And it has no grand prix, just 1 v 1 racing until you lose.
Yes that is deserving of a 3/10. Unless it's a free to play game.
This game is the equivalent of Mario Kart 8 (A game which has tight controls and great graphics) having one figure 8 circuit to race on with different material, a mode with only mega mushrooms, a mode with items and a mode without. Oh and you can play online but not with your friends, and the roster is smaller than Mario Kart 64. And it has no grand prix, just 1 v 1 racing until you lose.
Yes that is deserving of a 3/10. Unless it's a free to play game.
Not only the first two, the Tahahashi brothers did all Shining games until after the three Shining Force 3 episodes.tfw when u learn the lead designer and producer of all the mario golf and tennis games was also the director of the first two shining forces
And shouldn't price be taken into account in a review?
Not for the final score. Mention it in the review, obviously, but if a 3/10 game can double its score just by waiting a year and being used for 15 dollars, then it hardly seems like a proper score.And shouldn't price be taken into account in a review? For what they are charging this is a 3/10 game in my book. So you're telling me if a game has one mode but it looks great and plays great and is charged at full price it's not deserving of a 3/10? Especially if it's lacking in content compared to the game that came out 15 years ago?
You can only be awarded so many points for not being fundamentally flawed. This game is as barebones as a game can get.
It's a great party game, just like every other multiplayer Nintendo game. I don't think anyone is denying that. In that department it's as good as previous entries.
The lackluster modes, features, online, roster etc are legitimate concerns thus really low scores are completely justified.
Price doesn't change how good or bad a game is. Prices fluctuate and what's expensive to one person may not be to another
Oh come on. This game would be reviewed higher if it was advertised and sold as a £20 game and you know it.
Using that logic how can a game worth 99p ever score higher than a full price game? If I've paid 99p for a game then if it has just one thing to do and that thing is perfect then it would score highly
Not for the final score. Mention it in the review, obviously, but if a 3/10 game can double its score just by waiting a year and being used for 15 dollars, then it hardly seems like a proper score.
The game didn't improve in that time at all, only the price did. And yet the score would change if we factored price in, despite nothing being different about the actual game.
Oh come on. This game would be reviewed higher if it was advertised and sold as a £20 game and you know it.
Using that logic how can a game worth 99p ever score higher than a full price game? If I've paid 99p for a game then if it has just one thing to do and that thing is perfect then it would score highly.
Whether or not that's true doesn't change my feelings on it.
And now you just explained why I don't play mobile games.