• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Marvel Vs. Capcom: Infinite Characters and Stages Roster |DT2| oh dear...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Old marvel heads - did we ever figure out who "We Got It Urley" was? I want them to do it again with this game -- which is really starting to come together.
 
captain america looks cool, I like his shield throw can bring opponent back to your combo range. I didn't play MvC3, but is that move from MvC3? a lot of these feel really fresh for me since I skip MvC3
 

IntelliHeath

As in "Heathcliff"
I'm considering to start a DLC poll for people to show their supports for future DLC so I'm going to let people know that you can vote:


3 Veterans Marvel
3 Veterans Capcom

3 Newcomers Marvel
3 Newcomers Capcom

12 characters in total

I think I'm going to make a new thread tomorrow so I just want people to start to think what they want to vote for upcoming downloadable contents.
 

Jawmuncher

Member
I'm considering to start a DLC poll for people to show their supports for future DLC so I'm going to let people know that you can vote:


Vote for Regina, that's it.

I think I'm going to make a new thread tomorrow so I just want people to start to think what they want to vote for upcoming downloadable contents.

If you take my suggestion. It should be a pretty good thread.
 
Wait a second, didn't somebody say the Gamescom trailer is actually coming out a day before the con? Is Capcom planning to dedicate GC fully to SF (character and DLC reveal, Anniversary Collection reveal)?

Only Capcpom would do this a month before launch.
 

Blueblur1

Member
Wait a second, didn't somebody say the Gamescom trailer is actually coming out a day before the con? Is Capcom planning to dedicate GC fully to SF (character and DLC reveal, Anniversary Collection reveal)?

Only Capcpom would do this a month before launch.

These put out that new Monster Hunter World footage ahead of the show. Real odd choices.

Edit:
X-Kira posted a Capcom stage show schedule so they are going to be dedicating time to MvCI. The Capcom Germany site mentions the MHW sessions.

http://www.capcom-germany.de/2017/0...dir-deine-exklusive-gamescom-anspiel-session/

Wednesday, August 23rd
13:30h - Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite Fight Contest (Sony Stage, Hall 7)
14:00h - Monster Hunter: World Hunter Training (stage gamez.de powered by MediaMarkt, Hall 5.1)
15:00h - Monster Hunter: World - Exclusive Developer Presentation (Sony Stage, Hall 7)
16:00h - Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite with Peter Rosas (stage gamez.de powered by MediaMarkt, Hall 5.1)
 

IntelliHeath

As in "Heathcliff"
Wait a second, didn't somebody say the Gamescom trailer is actually coming out a day before the con? Is Capcom planning to dedicate GC fully to SF (character and DLC reveal, Anniversary Collection reveal)?

Only Capcpom would do this a month before launch.

Well, we haven't got gameplay trailer did we? So it's plausible that we could get gameplay trailer next week.
 

FSLink

Banned
That seems a bit more fair than a straight resurrection. Wonder how it works with a full team though?

Will the surge just be a life drain?

Maybe if your partner is still alive, it can be a life drain but only red life/gray life. So if you tag them back in they could get a gigantic chunk of damage taken off of them instantly if they get hit, or if they turtle for awhile they could heal it back up.
 
I still can't believe Capcom fucking juked us with that Venom (and technically BP) cover.

Is it possible Venom and Huntress were planned for launch but had to be pushed back?
 

JayEH

Junior Member
who knows, some dlc characters clearly should have been in the base game *cough Sigma *cough but I wouldn't take those covers to mean anything.
 

Rhaknar

The Steam equivalent of the drunk friend who keeps offering to pay your tab all night.
I still can't believe Capcom fucking juked us with that Venom (and technically BP) cover.

Is it possible Venom and Huntress were planned for launch but had to be pushed back?

anything is possible, but we knew the season pass was 6 characters, we saw the zip leak, they were probably DLC all along.

In fact, I think that the roster plus the DLC (aka the zip leak, with the mysterious 3rd capcom character) is all they have worked on in any capacity at all, and probably will wait and see how the game does to see if they do more.

Everyone is assuming there will be more dlc for sure but I really dont think anything is set in stone right now. You can argue they have a "DLC roadmap" planned, but thats probably just a list of characters. We'll see by this time next year what happened I guess.
 
anything is possible, but we knew the season pass was 6 characters, we saw the zip leak, they were probably DLC all along.

In fact, I think that the roster plus the DLC (aka the zip leak, with the mysterious 3rd capcom character) is all they have worked on in any capacity at all, and probably will wait and see how the game does to see if they do more.

Everyone is assuming there will be more dlc for sure but I really dont think anything is set in stone right now. You can argue they have a "DLC roadmap" planned, but thats probably just a list of characters. We'll see by this time next year what happened I guess.
You really think they're going to leave an entire financial quarter (Q4 2017, ends March 31) without any DLC? We're talking about the same company that released an entire year of original characters for a game that had underperformed greatly in sales. If what I've been told behind the scenes is correct, 24 characters were complete when SFV was launched. The game launched with 16 of them.

There's no question we're getting support until at least 2019 regardless of how the game performs (unless it sells literally 6 copies, then the plans change).
 
thatsmyfetish.jpg

it actually is >_<
Some porn for Rhaknar (NSFW):

Max said "the Soul stone is what everyone predicted, and much more"

HE then posted a bunch of MvC 1 (as in the first one) teases from that shit where you had every character on screen.

So consensus seems to be that maybe, you ressurect your fallen partner and then control both at the same time.
I really don't want to have to manage two characters. Almost all of the stones are unappealing to me because they bring on stuff like custom combos or new setups. I hate labbing that stuff. Just give me something that helps my general gameplay.
 

Rhaknar

The Steam equivalent of the drunk friend who keeps offering to pay your tab all night.
You really think they're going to leave an entire financial quarter (Q4 2017, ends March 31) without any DLC? We're talking about the same company that released an entire year of original characters for a game that had underperformed greatly in sales. If what I've been told behind the scenes is correct, 24 characters were complete when SFV was launched. The game launched with 16 of them.

There's no question we're getting support until at least 2019 regardless of how the game performs (unless it sells literally 6 copies, then the plans change).

im assuming it sells 6 copies, and I bought one of them, so...yeah.

We got the 12 leaked (on disc) characters in SF X Tekken and nothing else and that game didnt even bomb IIRC. Except it bombed in the community so they quickly moved on from it.

But hey, gimme all the dlc, I hope Im wrong.
 

Neoxon

Junior Member
im assuming it sells 6 copies, and I bought one of them, so...yeah.

We got the 12 leaked (on disc) characters in SF X Tekken and nothing else and that game didnt even bomb IIRC. Except it bombed in the community so they quickly moved on from it.

But hey, gimme all the dlc, I hope Im wrong.
It didn't help that SFIV was alive & well when SFxT came out, so the FGC had that to fall back on.
 

Jawmuncher

Member
Currently playing Injustice 2 (Was waiting for a friend to finish with it so I could borrow it). I gotta say after playing it for a bit. I'm very curious what a big budget MvC game would look like. I doubt we'll ever know but it's an interesting thing to think about.
 
Currently playing Injustice 2 (Was waiting for a friend to finish with it so I could borrow it). I gotta say after playing it for a bit. I'm very curious what a big budget MvC game would look like. I doubt we'll ever know but it's an interesting thing to think about.

It would look ugly if it follows the current artstyle.
 

enzo_gt

tagged by Blackace
One Month Away: An MvCi Demo Combo Showcase by KillerKai.

It's the story mode demo but it's got a lot of cool combos I hadn't seen before.

(god bless the patience of anyone willing to replay that demo enough times to come up with these)
giphy.gif


Dat Cap combo gotta be my favourite.
 
Currently playing Injustice 2 (Was waiting for a friend to finish with it so I could borrow it). I gotta say after playing it for a bit. I'm very curious what a big budget MvC game would look like. I doubt we'll ever know but it's an interesting thing to think about.

You don't need NRS for that. Disney should keep capcom license and give all creative/development rights to Arcsys. Then for a low budget you will have a game that will look and play better than all FGs out there. To save even more money they can just fire capcom and hire arcsys for Mavel vs Arcsys.
 
I mean if they're pushing for this kinda realism stuff anyway i'm sure more budget would've helped. Injustice 2 looks pretty good.

Definitely, I just think the current artstyle is a byproduct of trying to have the characters look like their MCU counterparts and the fact that IJ2 is selling like hotcakes. I prefer the anime style or hell UMVC3 should've been the foundation for greater things, the comic aesthetic was awesome (yet ppl hated initially like they do with anything capcom related)
 

Lulubop

Member
You don't need NRS for that. Disney should keep capcom license and give all creative/development rights to Arcsys. Then for a low budget you will have a game that will look and play better than all FGs out there. To save even more money they can just fire capcom and hire arcsys for Mavel vs Arcsys.

Like I said before, you think Marvel didn't dictate this realistic art style? They wouldn't let ASW use that, also this is just a really dumb suggestion overall. Not surprising, from you.
 
I'm considering to start a DLC poll for people to show their supports for future DLC so I'm going to let people know that you can vote:


3 Veterans Marvel
3 Veterans Capcom

3 Newcomers Marvel
3 Newcomers Capcom

12 characters in total

I think I'm going to make a new thread tomorrow so I just want people to start to think what they want to vote for upcoming downloadable contents.

Awesome. Can't wait to see how things have changed, if they have at all from the UMVC3 polls.
I wonder if just saying 6 Marvel and 6 Capcom would be better...I like the idea, but at the same time it might be needlessly restrictive
 

vg260

Member
They could have still had a "realistic" style for this game that looked better. There's plenty of room to work under that general concept.
 

Lulubop

Member
They could have still had a "realistic" style for this game that looked better. There's plenty of room to work under that general concept.

I mean obviously, IJ2 looks great and proves that. It doesn't change the fact that Marvel likely dictated the look and Capcom just can't pull it off, maybe due budget, time constants or just being bad at it.
 

Jawmuncher

Member
Awesome. Can't wait to see how things have changed, if they have at all from the UMVC3 polls.
I wonder if just saying 6 Marvel and 6 Capcom would be better...I like the idea, but at the same time it might be needlessly restrictive

IMO 6 characters per side seems like a lot. Especially when it comes to veterans.
Since someone like Wesker isn't really comparable to say Ruby Heart. A veteran that was in MVC3 has a hell of an easier time than a veteran in MVC2.

I'd say it should just be 3 per side. That way people are voting their absolutely must-have top 3 per side regardless of tag.
 
3 & 3 seems too small. Maybe back when 3 was out but Marvel has grown so much bigger and this game has left out a lot of characters. Its not enough. .

I'd say higher than 6 & 6 would be better (maybe 8 & 8?), but 6 & 6 should be fine. It gives the Ruby Hearts and Songbirds and Reginas a better chance to appear
 

IntelliHeath

As in "Heathcliff"
IMO 6 characters per side seems like a lot. Especially when it comes to veterans.
Since someone like Wesker isn't really comparable to say Ruby Heart. A veteran that was in MVC3 has a hell of an easier time than a veteran in MVC2.

I'd say it should just be 3 per side. That way people are voting their absolutely must-have top 3 per side regardless of tag.

I agreed. At same time, I feel like we have a huge pool of veterans not being in current game from their respectful games such as MVC2 and MVC3. Also we have many characters that haven't got their chance being included in Marvel vs. Capcom.
 

Zero-ELEC

Banned
I mean obviously, IJ2 looks great and proves that. It doesn't change the fact that Marvel likely dictated the look and Capcom just can't pull it off, maybe due budget, time constants or just being bad at it.
I don't think it's that Capcom couldn't "pull it off" and more that the art style is actively super bad.

Contest of Champions had the same type of art and it looks horrendous there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom