• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Mass Effect 4 Main Character called Ryder, FemRy confirmed default. Spring 2017

I think Hale did a much better job in ME1, Hale was the better Paragon and Meer was the better Renegade in ME2, and then Meer crushed it in ME3. Can't help but feel like Meer nails the comedic lines also, and as was just mentioned, he is awesome playing the Vorcha and the fucking Biotic God.

His, "Because it's a big stupid jelly fish!" delivery is also much better and that's all that matters really.
 
Source for this? I have not read that anywhere, and I pay attention to Mass Effect.

It's known that a segment of the Edmonton studio is working on the new IP, but the majority of the studio is currently working on Andromeda, similar to how Montreal was working on Inquisition when it was getting finished up.

Also, it's always been known that Montreal was taking the lead on Andromeda, and not Edmonton.
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/mass-effect-andromeda-dev-on-studio-tensions-femal/1100-6440814/
 

I also heard that some gameplay features are now being stripped out to meet the release date.

Oh I haven't heard about any of that. We've had a couple of modest changes, but nothing radical. All of the emphasis to move towards the free-form exploration, all that's still in there and very grounded in the mechanics.

"Modest changes" doesn't really translate into cutting a few features though.

Also, in the same interview:

Now that we have some years of distance from it, how did you feel about the Mass Effect 3 ending? The backlash, the alternate ending, bowing to fan pressure; how do you feel about all of it?

Well, I was there when the Mass Effect 3 ending happened, so I have a lot of therapy bills.

Seriously?

Oh yeah, I mean [releasing the alternate ending] was an incredibly cathartic moment for the studio. There we were, desperate to pay off a decade of work, and to have that negativity come back we thought, god, what are we doing here?

Heads were hanging like this [puts heads in hands between his knees]. It was a deeply introspective and challenging time for all of us. We carry a lot of scars from that time, and took a lot of lessons.

We all grew though it. I think everyone who went through that is a better developer because of it, and I think a lot of those people are determined to make a better Mass Effect game in a different setting. A lot of the motivation for me personally comes from that Mass Effect 3 ending.

Lol poor devs, so much pressure & negativity must have been hard for them.
 
49545322361674384.jpg



I'm sorry
 
Will be interesting to compare and contrast statistics of female vs male playable options. Having main character as female default means people will have to actively change character to default male.

In Mass Effect 2 and Mass Effect 3, despite the FemShep love and hype, only 18% ever played as her in the campaign and a whopping 82 percent always picked ManShep.
 
It's funny because it's a play on words. It has absolutely nothing to do with what happened in Orlando, obviously.

I don't know how else to delicately point out that it doesn't have to be gay.

Dick Ryder for a male doesn't mean gay? How many straight guys do you know that ride dicks?

It's not funny and casual homophobia is the reason LGBTQ+ people seek out safe spaces where they then get shot and killed.
 
"Modest changes" doesn't really translate into cutting a few features though.

Also, in the same interview:



Lol poor devs, so much pressure & negativity must have been hard for them.

Yeah, everyone came out of that with scars, devs and fans. Those were dark, ugly, soul-reaving times.
 
Lol poor devs, so much pressure & negativity must have been hard for them.

This may be hard for you to grasp, but it takes a lot of hard work to even make a bad game and it's common for developers to lose objectivity on the end result of their work.

The studio put a lot of effort into the game and took the reactions personally, even without the personal attacks in which some people on the internet engaged.
 
Lol poor devs, so much pressure & negativity must have been hard for them.

They deserved all the crap they got for that ending.

Dick Ryder for a male doesn't mean gay? How many straight guys do you know that ride dicks?

It's not funny and casual homophobia is the reason LGBTQ+ people seek out safe spaces where they then get shot and killed.

Dude, it's such a light-hearted joke, I really doubt the poster intended to disparage any gay person when he/she posted that. Lighten up a little. I would like to assume that gay people are not as brittle as you think they are.
 
They deserved all the crap they got for that ending.
.

Still was too much of an overreaction for what is basically just a video game ending. Poorly done sure, but still. Some of their better efforts in the game were completely ignored because people were too focused on raging at the ending.

Still, part of me think that, thanks to all that, we got the excellent Citadel DLC, with all the love & attention that's in it.
 
Still was too much of an overreaction for what is basically just a video game ending. Poorly done sure, but still. Some of their better efforts in the game were completely ignored because people were too focused on raging at the ending.

Still, part of me think that, thanks to all that, we got the excellent Citadel DLC, with all the love & attention that's in it.

It's pretty obvious the conclusion of the Mass Effect trilogy meant something more than just any other videogame ending - maybe not to media commentators and casual players but the level of investment longterm fans had in the climax was markedly different from other titles. There really hasn't been anything comparable before or after.

I'll grant that the ending backlash did overshadow discussion of the games stronger elements (multiplayer, tine-tuned combat mechanics, Tuchanka, some of the quieter character moments) but even apart from the final act, there are some questionable design decisions (railroaded opening, drive-by questgivers, war readiness with real-time decay, off-screen Citadel massacre, everything Kai Leng, Cerberus' villainy of infinite armies etc.)

But you're right, Citadel DLC was definitely an acknowledgement of fan investment and a fun thing in its own right.
 
Still was too much of an overreaction for what is basically just a video game ending. Poorly done sure, but still. Some of their better efforts in the game were completely ignored because people were too focused on raging at the ending.

Still, part of me think that, thanks to all that, we got the excellent Citadel DLC, with all the love & attention that's in it.

It's not "just" a video game ending. For a fan like me that poured hundreds upon hundreds upon hundreds of hours on the trilogy and bought all the DLCs and invested so many emotionally in the games, that ending felt like my head got hit by an anvil the size of a schoolbus. I didn't just feel disappointed, I felt betrayed.
 
It's not "just" a video game ending. For a fan like me that poured hundreds upon hundreds upon hundreds of hours on the trilogy and bought all the DLCs and invested so many emotionally in the games, that ending felt like my head got hit by an anvil the size of a schoolbus. I didn't just feel disappointed, I felt betrayed.

I'm a big fan who replayed the trilogy like 10 times and I didn't overreact as much as some people.

Maybe it's because I started playing ME1 & ME2 in 2011 rather than when they were released, so I didn't have to wait years to see the trilogy ends, but who knows. It sure didn't "destroyed" the whole trilogy for me, preventing me to enjoy the games as I did before, didn't feel like vomiting when the ending happened, didn't want the devs to lose their job, or whatever hyperbole I saw back in the day.


Anyway... if the devs all learned from this to make a better game in ME:A, well... I guess there is nothing to worry about this happening again.
 
This is an insulting assumption to all guys actually named Dick Ryder.

Yeah I'm sure he was referencing all the people named Dick Ryder and how it should be the only choice for a male character on their behalf.

Well dick is just short for Richard sooo


Why not just say Richard Ryder then?

Ctrl + F "dick" 0 results on that page.

There are plenty of other names he could have picked, but no Dick was the only one he said because of the connotation. Trying to defend him by spinning it any which way but, means you are part of the problem.
 
Imagine all the jokes they must have gotten lobbed at them, and now you make an assumption on someone based purely on their name? Disgraceful!

Well, it's silly to make an assumption like that about someone based solely on their name, I agree, but it's not insulting. In fact, you saying it's insulting is kind of homophobic because it implies that being gay or being seen as gay (or as a bottom) is a negative thing when, in fact, assuming that someone is gay based on their name would be no different than assuming that someone has brown hair based on their name or assuming that their favourite colour is blue or that they enjoy rollercoasters. Silly and non-sensical, sure, but insulting? No, not at all.
 
I dont understand this obsession with the gender of mass effects marketed character? Its an rpg for christ sake. You can select sex, or race. No one ever said you have to play as male or fem shep.
 
I dont understand this obsession with the gender of mass effects marketed character? Its an rpg for christ sake. You can select sex, or race. No one ever said you have to play as male or fem shep.

I mean, if they use a female protagonist in their marketing material, that does make a bit of a statement as far as marketability of female protagonists in AAA video games goes so I can see why it's important to some people.
 
Well, it's silly to make an assumption like that about someone based solely on their name, I agree, but it's not insulting. In fact, you saying it's insulting is kind of homophobic because it implies that being gay or being seen as gay (or as a bottom) is a negative thing when, in fact, assuming that someone is gay based on their name would be no different than assuming that someone has brown hair based on their name or assuming that their favourite colour is blue or that they enjoy rollercoasters. Silly and non-sensical, sure, but insulting? No, not at all.

It is insulting BECAUSE of the negative connotations. He was making a joke about Dick Riding for the male character, what other way is it meant to be taken?

How is a statement of fact that gay people have anal intercourse funny other than being negative?
 
I dont understand this obsession with the gender of mass effects marketed character? Its an rpg for christ sake. You can select sex, or race. No one ever said you have to play as male or fem shep.

It's nice to see yourself represented
Marketing and default choices influence who players will choose to play as
It's good for non-dominant narratives/experiences to be disseminated
Female characters, especially protagonists, are usually marginalized and made invisible in the games industry and entertainment in general
 
Thats what I'm trying to say. As a statement of fact it's not funny. He only meant it in the negative way.

I'm sorry, I don't see it. I find it funny because it's a sexual innuendo and that has got nothing to do with homophobia or bottom shaming (if that's how I'd read it, I certainly wouldn't be laughing at it). Of course, I don't know how the person who posted it meant it but I definitely don't think that the only possible interpretation of the joke is to say it's homophobic.
 
Yeah I'm sure he was referencing all the people named Dick Ryder and how it should be the only choice for a male character on their behalf.





Why not just say Richard Ryder then?

Ctrl + F "dick" 0 results on that page.

There are plenty of other names he could have picked, but no Dick was the only one he said because of the connotation. Trying to defend him by spinning it any which way but, means you are part of the problem.

Dick has been used in England as a short term for Richard since the 12th century.
 
I'm a big fan who replayed the trilogy like 10 times and I didn't overreact as much as some people.

Maybe it's because I started playing ME1 & ME2 in 2011 rather than when they were released, so I didn't have to wait years to see the trilogy ends, but who knows. It sure didn't "destroyed" the whole trilogy for me, preventing me to enjoy the games as I did before, didn't feel like vomiting when the ending happened, didn't want the devs to lose their job, or whatever hyperbole I saw back in the day.


Anyway... if the devs all learned from this to make a better game in ME:A, well... I guess there is nothing to worry about this happening again.

Man, I can understand the way you feel but for ME3 was the biggest gut-punch I've ever experienced in a game. I bought and played ME1 on Day 1. I've played a LOT of games in my time and I've never come close to experiencing that distaste for anything.
 
The ending of 3 was a wet fart for a few reasons: catalyst kid (???), synthesis/control options (???), no epilogue.

Say what you will about Dragon Age but Origins and Inquisition offer a full rundown of what happens to your characters and how they develop after the game as a result of your choices including what happens to the world. A simple text slideshow like Origins/Inquisition wouls have led to far less if any vitriol from fans.

The overreaction was legit hilarious though.
 
Default means all the box art is FemRyder. Excellent! If it's the same girl from the trailer then I'm all for it.
 
They got death threats.

I'm pretty sure (or at least hope) that they were including that -Obviously they didn't deserve threats of any kind.

That doesn't mean they're exempt from the underlying communication/criticism about the ending's various issues (or purportedly just Casey and Mac, if that one post by a certain someone is to be believed).
 
I'm still bitter at no playable Turians or Krogan.

But it is what it is. I thought it would be the best time to let you pick species now that we moved on from Shepard, but alas.
 
Top Bottom