OptimistPrime
Member
5 nm is booked out for 2020 and 2021....He was being funny.
I don’t believe that is a complete list, but you’re right about it being booked.
5 nm is booked out for 2020 and 2021....He was being funny.
That is what they are doing. Lockharts SoC will be the same as the XSX' one with fewer CU's and less RAM.I suppose the question is whether they have been able to get the 7nm chip Zen2 based chip and then essentially port it over to 5nm, make it so that it'll run everything the other chip will (at lower settings) without any issues (and in a way that doesn't irritate developers who have to work towards one more piece of target hardware) and have it all ready to release at the same time. Seems like a lot of work to do.
Maybe someone with an engineering background can shed some light on this.
absolutely hilarious lolYou accidently posted your report here, did you send mods you view on lockhart
People might also want to toss aside his PS5 defensive Tweets that's being thrown around as fact.instantly destroyed credibility.
Well did the Wii, Wii-U and Switch hold anything back. There's a bit more work in trying to test and optimize for another platform. But people forget how configurable devs make their games. You can reduce the performance required by simply cutting the frame rate or resolution. Disable certain affects or reduce the intensity of them. It's up to the developers. Even if you had more power, it doesn't mean they have to use it.I highly doubt lower specs won’t hold a nextgen game back unless ps5 is the lead platform and that’s bad news for other platforms so if the want a game to work on S it’ll be scaled down dramatically
People might also want to toss aside his PS5 defensive Tweets that's being thrown around as fact.
I called it out and doing so here again with a this subject, were you not a supporter of the above?
That is what they are doing. Lockharts SoC will be the same as the XSX' one with fewer CU's and less RAM.
Devkits have profiles for XSX and Lockhart, so that makes it easier for devs to optimize for each box.
Would be smart. Just like a PSP 3 would be smart at this point.
And for the people who keep mentioning Vita, that was when the game studios had to make separate games for both PS3/PS4
and VIta... Just like when Nintendo had to separate their studios to 3DS games and Wii / Wii U games.
We’re not in the same place.
Doubt Nintendo, Xbox or PlayStation would separate there projects/studios for Home console and Portable if they stick/ decide to go portable games..... so don't mention the Vita to why it wont work lol.
But if they do what Nintendo did with the Switch does and have the same games but downscaled.... then both Xbox and Playstation would have all the 1st party exclusives portable but also all there 3rd party games that have been on PS4 and Xbox
People might not think they wont want it or it wont sell, but it would. It saved Nintendo from the Wii U failure and both Playstation and Xbox have better 3rd party games for sure.
Only Nintendo would wouldn’t like it
Microsoft may not have experience with handheld gaming machines, but they've been in the portable computing world longer than virtually anyone else in the game. Palm pilots, phones, tablets - Microsoft has been there since the start. Does that translate to handheld gaming? Who knows. If Microsoft want to compete in the Asian territories, a portable next-gen Xbox is going to do better than the Series X and Series S combined. It's not a risk from a pure "would people want this" point of view - the answer to "would you want a hand-held machine capable of playing every major third party game in addition to the entire Xbox library - including all backwards compatible titles" is always going to the "shut up and take my money".Yeah but Nintendo is the only one with loads of experience with handhelds. Sony has some experience (they've only realised two handheld platforms, 3 if you count PSPGo) whereas Nintendo has released close to 20 devices if you count all the bits and bobs (different Gameboys, different DSs, different 3DSs and 2DS) and then Switch. Microsoft has zero experience with handhelds and given that they lost this generation (at least in terms of market share and certainly mindshare if the instagram/twitter/youtube stats are anything to go by), I can't see them taking that sort of risk.
You didnt read my other post? Everything is decided by yields. And when you are on a new node like 5nm, the yields will be much lover than 7nm (at this point)That would mean AMD has a viable 5nm chip ready to ship in 2020 but that they haven't got one ready for their own CPU/APU lineups. Sounds unlikely. Especially since we're expecting 5nm Zen 4 next year.
I can understand the difficulty keeping your narrative afloat when the only number you have to cling to is "4"T the end of the day, 4 TF is 4TF. The reasoning for this to exist being to satisfy 720p gamers is borderline sabotage. Unless it's a handheld.
I hope it's not true. Microsoft seem to have acknowledged that Nintendo owns the portable space. That's why Microsoft is supporting Switch with software, it's not a competitior.
Also reads more like speculation rather than inside information.
Yeah but Nintendo is the only one with loads of experience with handhelds. Sony has some experience (they've only realised two handheld platforms, 3 if you count PSPGo) whereas Nintendo has released close to 20 devices if you count all the bits and bobs (different Gameboys, different DSs, different 3DSs and 2DS) and then Switch. Microsoft has zero experience with handhelds and given that they lost this generation (at least in terms of market share and certainly mindshare if the instagram/twitter/youtube stats are anything to go by), I can't see them taking that sort of risk.
How could it be high end and low cost at the same time?????????????Why not? It makes 100% sense after the success of the Switch. Release a low-cost portable console that can play the entire Xbox library. Really shocking Sony didn’t do the same.
Think of the Nintendo Gamecube.wut you say?
Think of the Nintendo Gamecube.
People have been saying this since the original Xbox. There were “leaks” and rumors of a handheld xbox during the 360 lifespan.I think a dedicated portable xbox device will happen. Maybe not now but in the future. Plays all games for series x in 1080 p or lower all old xbox games. Streaming for x cloud all digital. Perfect for a lot of markets. Even if it does 80 millions units like the psp that is still a success. Do i think its happening now? no but I really hope it does happen.
I have a switch. I love it but lets not lie the system is built like a piece of garbage. Why should nintendo care? they are the only handheld console around. Everyone will buy it. If there is another competitor there will be more pressure on nintendo to make better hardware have more sales on games etc. WE all win in this. Competition is good
Would buy a portable Xbox and i think the other 3 people i play X with would also.
Battery life will be 30 minutes.
I would be surprised if Sony or Microsoft ever tried to horn in on Nintendo's handheld territory ever again. I mean on one hand the Switch has shown that there is definitely a market for hybrid-type consoles, but on the other it's a lose-lose situation for whoever goes for it - they'd have to compete against both Nintendo, who's ruled that space for decades (though the PSP did put up an admirable fight) and the other platform maker, who wouldn't be "held back" by having to take a handheld SKU into account.
I dunno. The Vita is a nice piece of hardware, if Sony had done some things differently (MEMORY CARDS) it could have had a much longer lifespan. Who can say.
PSP sold more than 3DS and Gameboy Advance.
Only the DS and also classic gameboy combined with the Gameboy colour have sold more than PSP. And they are Nintendo’s biggest selling machines.
People forget Nintendo failed plenty of times but come back from the ashes lol.
All Sony has to do is have decent memory cards and downscale there console games (PS4 and PS5 ) a decent price, and they will have a winner. Same with Xbox. All your gaming library on the go on day 1 is a big sale.
They might not get close to outselling the Switch but they will do well for both PlayStation and Xbox.
110 million plus PS4 owners aren't gonna say nah, I dont want my games on the go. All your current library on the go... Day 1 for me lol
The PSP wasn’t competing with the 3DS, it was competing with the DS, which sold around 60 million units more than it did. Fewer people in general were buying dedicated handhelds when the 3DS and Vita arrived..
Never said anything about Nintendo never failing, just that they’ve always owned the handheld space...which is true.
Microsoft may not have experience with handheld gaming machines, but they've been in the portable computing world longer than virtually anyone else in the game. Palm pilots, phones, tablets - Microsoft has been there since the start. Does that translate to handheld gaming? Who knows. If Microsoft want to compete in the Asian territories, a portable next-gen Xbox is going to do better than the Series X and Series S combined. It's not a risk from a pure "would people want this" point of view - the answer to "would you want a hand-held machine capable of playing every major third party game in addition to the entire Xbox library - including all backwards compatible titles" is always going to the "shut up and take my money".
The risk is: is it physically possible to make a usable hand-held gaming machine packing next-gen power? I have a basic understanding of some of the hardware at play, so while I certainly love the concept and would pay a premium for it, I just don't see how it is physically possible. I could be wrong - my limited understanding is limited. And if I am, I'll buying one a portable Xbox on day one. But... I just don't see it happening.
You didnt read my other post? Everything is decided by yields. And when you are on a new node like 5nm, the yields will be much lover than 7nm (at this point)
The more transistors you use, the lower the yield. (more defects on the chip) That's why XSX and PS5 and all PC GPU's, wich usually uses al lot of transistors, isn't viable for 5nm yet. What you need is a sweetspot where the size of the chip (# transistors) gives you the best yields, and I guess an APU with 20CU's were the prefered size for MS. (cost/performance) (yield = cost)