pokemon stadium games are pointless these days
Maybe I am misunderstanding but Smash being in development for 3DS+Wii U was announced by Iwata at e3 2011. That was the 3DS panic mode phase not the Wii U panic mode phase.
So they have Ubi, EA and others on board but it won't be interesting for PS4 gamers? So what does that mean for multiplatform titles on NX? Vastly inferior? It's a bit odd.
I really don't like the "within 6 months" part, these really need to be at launch. Nintendo needs to be running out the gate, day one, hitting hard with their big franchises. If they can get big sales at the start, that's what will bring in the third party support - that's what both 3DS and Wii U were missing, and really is why 3DS flopped so damn hard for its first year.
Admittedly, this is a rumor, and maybe there's something super secret in the works that we don't know about - like a new Mario Kart for day 1 or something. Or the Final Fantasy VII Remake has suddenly become NX exclusive.
Most of those gamers have already a ps4 and/or 3ds. I don't think that they really want that kind of gamers.
Also Nintendo seems not to be interested in those gamers:
http://www.polygon.com/2014/8/27/6074865/miyamoto-signals-nintendo-desire-to-focus-on-hardcore
Or they have changed their mind.
I'm setting my expectations to "Sun/Moon ports". I know Game Freak has never done it before, but that doesn't mean they won't.Getting hopes up for a new Pokemon game... But will probably leave disappointed.
Will be the difference between if I buy one or not.
There's no reason to say "within 6 months" if you mean "launch day".
Activision bring the Skylanders and Warners bring the Legos I assume... ugh... I expect third party support for this thing to be garbage.
EA doesn't really make any console based family or children's titles anymore, so if that's actually the pitch Nintendo has been going to Western third parties with instead of just the conclusion some of them have come to, then EA would be a harder fit. Ubisoft has a wide variety (Just Dance, Just Sing, Hasbro, Rabbids), Warner has LEGO, Activision has Skylanders and sometimes licensed titles. EA's closest fit is sports games, which was what they were rumored to be negotiating over.
Don't most smartphones have NFC capabilities now? That would likely be the simplest way to do that, no? Otherwise I would think syncing your Pokemon GO account and your My Nintendo/NNID would be another way to do it.
Well yeah. The difference there is that Mario and Sonic games are hot garbage enough that even IGN wouldn't review it and Stadium games are well beloved spinoff parts of the Pokemon series by fans.You hope that Mario isn't Mario and Sonic at the Olympic games, but you want Pokemon to be a Stadium game instead of Sun and Moon?
![]()
Please give me a Monster Hunter on the TV again. I'm tired of trying to make out tiny details on a small screen. The MH games have such beautiful backdrops and it made me especially sad to see MH3U stuff in Gen.Well, these franchises seem kind of guaranteed to come to NX:
Monster Hunter
Yokai Watch
Dragon Quest
Final Fantasy something
Sonic
Rune Factory
Rayman something
Bravely Default sequel
Something Shin Megami Tensei/Persona
just dance
Professor Layton sequel
Phoenix wright sequel
I also kind of expect something platinum (bayo 3 even?), something Omega Force and a lot of collabs with third parties like they did on wii u.
I feel that the "PS4 gamers" they were referring to are the ones that wouldn't want to play the same games that is already available to them with downgraded graphics to some extent. I guess you can argue that Sony tried that with the PSVisa and ultimately failed, but that system had other marketing issues.So they have Ubi, EA and others on board but it won't be interesting for PS4 gamers? So what does that mean for multiplatform titles on NX? Vastly inferior? It's a bit odd.
What clear is that Nintendo is not fixing what's not broken. They're continuing their handheld legacy but now they're adding all of their home console support to it. Right now they are unrivaled in handheld area, not even by smartphones, as they're still unable to provide core gaming experience. They know the difference of two markets and are working to get the best out of them both.
EA could still do the PvZ games too, assuming they think Frostbite is a good fit for that hardware.
EA doesn't really make any console based family or children's titles anymore, so if that's actually the pitch Nintendo has been going to Western third parties with instead of just the conclusion some of them have come to, then EA would be a harder fit. Ubisoft has a wide variety (Just Dance, Just Sing, Hasbro, Rabbids), Warner has LEGO, Activision has Skylanders and sometimes licensed titles. EA's closest fit is sports games, which was what they were rumored to be negotiating over.
Yes, it makes all the sense in the world. A killer launch lineup is what is needed, they tried to spread things out for the 3DS, it flopped, they tried to spread things out for Wii U, it flopped. 3DS even had some pretty darn great third-parties at launch (Super Street Fighter IV was an amazing port), but sales didn't take off until it had Zelda, Mario Kart, and 3D Land, and because of that all the third party support that was promised before launch just dried up. I worked for a company making handheld games for publishers at the time, and it was terrible seeing all of our contracts disappear almost overnight (and then my company was sold to a mobile developer).does it really make sense to launch with a bunch of huge first party titles all at the same time?
resources aren't unlimited. nintendo doesn't have the luxury of... third party support, so they kinda need to stretch their software in order to avoid droughts.
I don't think it would kill them to have zelda at launch, then this pokemon title 2 months later, and then mario 2 months after that.
Yes, it makes all the sense in the world. A killer launch lineup is what is needed, they tried to spread things out for the 3DS, it flopped, they tried to spread things out for Wii U, it flopped. 3DS even had some pretty darn great third-parties at launch (Super Street Fighter IV was an amazing port), but sales didn't take off until it had Zelda, Mario Kart, and 3D Land, and because of that all the third party support that was promised before launch just dried up. I worked for a company making handheld games for publishers at the time, and it was terrible seeing all of our contracts disappear almost overnight (and then my company was sold to a mobile developer).
NX needs to launch with their biggest titles, make a big splash, and then the "drought" can be held off with smaller titles - it won't need a constant stream of AAA hits if it launches with them, that'll keep new people buying the console for a while.
Would it be a true Sun/Moon port? I think a third version ('Dusk' Version? Haha) or even Sun2/Moon2 make more sense.
Please give me a Monster Hunter on the TV again. I'm tired of trying to make out tiny details on a small screen. The MH games have such beautiful backdrops and it made me especially sad to see MH3U stuff in Gen.
I would prefer much more a schedule where there is a constant stream of games than a blowout at launch and then drought.
A new Mario game (a true 3D Mario hopefully) would be amazing, but likely will be Mario Maker port.
Better than massive third-party droughts. Do you know how many huge publishers announced 3DS support before launch, who then canceled their games after? A ton. 3DS launched with crap from Nintendo, no huge franchises - Steel Diver, Nintendogs, Pilotwings. Many people blame the price of the system for its initial flop, but when they dropped the price, sales didn't pick up. Not until it had Zelda, 3D Land, and Mario Kart did sales recover. Nintendo's big mistake in recent times has been to hold off on their big franchises, to keep droughts away and to give third-party launch titles a chance to shine. It obviously hasn't been working.What you're proposing is horrible. It would have been an awful idea to launch 3DS with Zelda, 3D Land, Mario Kart 7, and Star Fox 64 3D. You're cannibalizing sales and setting the system up for massive droughts in the future.
Better than massive third-party droughts. Do you know how many huge publishers announced 3DS support before launch, who then canceled their games after? A ton. 3DS launched with crap from Nintendo, no huge franchises - Steel Diver, Nintendogs, Pilotwings. Many people blame the price of the system for its initial flop, but when they dropped the price, sales didn't pick up. Not until it had Zelda, 3D Land, and Mario Kart did sales recover.
Based on Albertos and Emilys statements, nope. What is your source?
According to an exec quoted by MCV, the NX is A nice bit of kit, a bit of a novelty, but a good one. They also suggest its being aimed at a middle ground between casual smartphone users and hardcore gamers: It wont appeal to PS4 fans. Nintendo seems set on trying to upgrade smartphone gamers. Thats going to be a big job for the marketing department.
Yoinks...
Iwata said:We have come to the stage where we can say that we will be able to develop and operate software which, in the end, will not hurt the value of Nintendo IP but, rather, will become an opportunity for the great number of people around the world who own smart devices—but do not have interest in dedicated video game hardware—to be interested in Nintendo IP and eventually to become fans of our dedicated game systems.
This really shouldn't be surprising to anyone paying attention, but Nintendo really won't gain anything but competing exclusively with Sony and MS. They're much better served trying to create their own market, which is what this report is suggesting when they say targeting "an audience that sits between smartphone gamers and the more hardcore users of PS4 and Xbox One."
EA doesn't really make any console based family or children's titles anymore, so if that's actually the pitch Nintendo has been going to Western third parties with instead of just the conclusion some of them have come to, then EA would be a harder fit. Ubisoft has a wide variety (Just Dance, Just Sing, Hasbro, Rabbids), Warner has LEGO, Activision has Skylanders and sometimes licensed titles. EA's closest fit is sports games, which was what they were rumored to be negotiating over.
But dont you think "wont appeal to PS4 fans" is a bit of a red light...
But dont you think "wont appeal to PS4 fans" is a bit of a red light...
But dont you think "wont appeal to PS4 fans" is a bit of a red light...
You honestly don't believe Nintendo is interested in the type of consumer who plays on smartphones? Really?
Nintendo's entire mobile initiative revolves around attempting to convince those players to purchase their dedicated hardware. So, the idea that NX will be aimed at that audience makes complete sense. That doesn't mean it's going to lack traditional Nintendo software.
But dont you think "wont appeal to PS4 fans" is a bit of a red light...
The red light is on since years and it's called AAA 3rd parties support.
Yeah, you aren't getting a new game or gen, 5 months after SM launch.
They have also told before that their mobile games purpose is to let smartphone gamers experience Nintendo their IP's. They ones that becomes a real gamer, that are the people Nintendo wants.
They don't want to focus on the smartphone owners that plays candy crush or angry birds. The ones that play only 1 time/week, because they know they wouldn't want to pay 40$ for a game.
Nintendo wouldn't only target that public but also the ones that own a ps4 or xbox one and wants to have second a console.
That makes more sense.
So i wouldn't expect many casual crap games like we did experience on the wii.
From that Metro article
That list isnt necessarily the departure it sounds like though, as it doesnt really imply anything other than the sort of family friendly titles that already appeared on the Wii U. Especially as theres no EA, 2K Games, Rockstar, or Bethesda.
Can still happen but I'm not holding my breath.
The 3DS had a rough launch, but releasing a bunch of AAA first party titles on day one wouldn't have been the ideal solution, when you're setting up your platform for a massive lull for an entire year afterwards. The price was absolutely a huge factor as well. You can't really discount that.
And Zelda released two months before the price drop.