Is this coming to next gen consoles?
xbox 360, ps3.
Is this coming to next gen consoles?
How about some actual advanced graphics options this time.
How comparable is one Titan to SLI 670's?
so high system requirements for a console port.
Recommended System Requirements
Windows: Vista, 7 or 8
CPU: 2.6 GHz Quad Core, e.g. Intel Core i5
RAM: 4GB
Direct X: 11
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GTX 580 / 660 Ti or higher
Optimum System Requirements
Windows: Vista, 7 or 8
CPU: 3.4 GHz Multi-Core, e.g. Intel Core i7
RAM: 8GB
Direct X: 11
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GTX 680 SLI / NVIDIA GTX 690 / NVIDIA Titan
Last Light optimization is miles better than 2033. I saw the alpha at GamesCom in 2011, and they had it running at that time on a 590.
The TITAN Optimum spec is every single thing on max at something like 2560x1440/1600. Oh and the specs come from Deep Silver, not us, per the suggestion above
Where did the specs in the OP come from? The Recommended and Optimum specs talk about Quad Cores and up:
You can verify this by looking at the Deep Silver press release version on http://www.gamespress.com/release.asp?c=}%050k4
Sounds like they didn't bother optimizing.
And Nvidia will not mention competitors on their site. Hence the absence of 'equivalent' AMD cards. A 7870 is our 'recommended' AMD card, as confirmed in the Deep Silver release. I'm sure you can figure out the rest!
I never really saw a problem with 2033's performance, other than a couple of settings that cripple frame rate (The DX11 options, and the light ray stuff, which looked just as good on the lower setting and ran great still).
Titan recommendation is probably just a tits crazy full blown max whack thing not a YOU NEED THIS.
Is the game even 64 bit? You arent going to be using 8gb on a 32 bit system it doesnt work that way.
BTW they claim high res textures AGAIN (like in metro 2033) but it will be the same assets as the console version. If the console versions are the same size as the PC version I dont see where the magical higher res textures are coming from.
it only took a year and a half and my 6870 is already a piece of shit
No worries, I'd own a card that is Titan powerful eventually, anyone want to tell me when its at $199 ;P
Console port indeed.
2033 was a hot mess of a game system spec wise, the sequel will also be a hot mess. I don't even understand why, the graphics for 2033 were not crysis level of amazing to justify the power you needed to run it.
By the time it'll be $199 there will probably be better GPUs to buy for that money (because they'll be based on newer architectures)
Five bucks says 1080p with a GTX 580, post process AA, and 1 setting down from the very highest at 40-60 FPS is a shoe in. Quote me on this if you want.
You realize that metro runs all of its effects at screen resoultion right?
Unlike other games with half or quarter rez buffers, metro brute forces them to screen res so that they look good no matter which resolution you run at.
The deal is that they do not compromise.
The engine is actually great at scaling from what you can see even in the first game. People giving a stink about the "optimal" recommendations need to get a grip.
That most likely is referring to 2560X1440 with high levels of AA (supersampled, MSAA, etc...)
Hence why the 3Dvision requirements for that spec are the same due to 3Dvision monitors typically being 1080p and not 1440p.
I am not surprised at all by these specs.
Five bucks says 1080p with a GTX 580, post process AA, and 1 setting down from the very highest at 40-60 FPS is a shoe in. Quote me on this if you want.
I said gat damn. I'm sure this game will look amazing though.Optimum System Requirements
Windows: Vista, 7 or 8
CPU: 3.4 GHz Multi-Core, e.g. Intel Core i7
RAM: 8GB
Direct X: 11
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GTX 680 SLI / NVIDIA GTX 690 / NVIDIA Titan
I said gat damn. I'm sure this game will look amazing though.
Anybody know how much a Titan will be?
I said gat damn. I'm sure this game will look amazing though.
Anybody know how much a Titan will be?
that's great and all but how does that make the game look better when it's running poorly for majority of users?
It will probably be the 2015 releases as Titan is a dual GPU card,
Its the exact same assets as the console version most likely.Isn't it generally said that you should have a decent amount more power than the recommended settings say? My PC just got way fuckin outclassed.
Also, I don't know jack about this, but 7.5 gigs seems incredibly modest. Bioshock Infinite on PC was like 15 gigs, and that was mostly due to high res textures wasn't it? What's the difference here, if you know? Is it because it's a shorter game, or smaller in scale?
Great looking games on PC like BF3 run flawlessly.People complain about graphics not being good.
Good graphics come out.
People complain their old PCs can't run it at max settings.
People complain about graphics not being good.
Good graphics come out.
People complain their old PCs can't run it at max settings.
It will probably be the 2015 releases as Titan is a dual GPU card,
I thought the whole thing about the Titan was that it was single GPU.
With AMD equivalents
I'm sure it was said before, but I don't remember where... What's nVidia's equivalent (or similar) to AMD 7970 so I can see my PC on this?
I'm sure it was said before, but I don't remember where... What's nVidia's equivalent (or similar) to AMD 7970 so I can see my PC on this?
Optimum is talking about 2560x, max DirectX 11 game settings with full-res fullscreen effects, DirectX 11 object and environment tessellation, 2048x2048 textures, and hardware PhysX effects.
The game is highly optimized, allowing 4A to run all that stuff simultaneously at such a high resolution on one TITAN, two 670s, two 680s, or one 690. If it weren't optimized that would be impossible.