I think MS could really go somewhere with the Windows store and PC gaming if they really tried. They would of course have to make all their (MS) content exclusive. And try to persuade other companies to choose their store over Steam. MS definitely has more muscle when it comes to marketing and these sorts of deal than Valve, so they could secure a lot of exclusive content, and of course gamers go where the games are so things would go quite well for MS.
They probably won't do anything though.
In more general terms, I've been saying almost the same thing to anyone crazy enough to actually pay attention to anything I say at all.
Microsoft can and, dare I say it,
should work on a games client using the base they established with GFWL, but with obvious enhancements and improvements. I liked the general feature set it offered. I didn't, and still don't, like its execution.
And there's a bunch they can do that's so obvious it'd be practically copying Steam with the added caveat of cross-platform party chat and cross-play. Wouldn't that be fucking neat-o?
I mean, really, they should hire me for all the ideas I have:
--Games client with base featureset of GFWL, with several tweaks to increase usability and user friendliness
--Enable cross-platform party chat and cross-play for Gold members, but keep system online free for PC (i.e., if you want to play with Xbox players, you have to pay for Gold. If not, then you don't have to and can play with other PC players).
--Take what Steam does well and make the new software do it better.
--Start up more PC-specific games studios that aim to make PC-exclusive software, while keeping them separate from the console studios.
That's
literally all I ask of them. I, personally, still want Microsoft in the PC digital distribution arena. I'm one of the few that couldn't care less for Steam.
We already know how this story ended with GFWL. With many of those devs having to work to remove it and move to steamworks, I doubt many companies have the faith to go on board solely on an MS store or with integrated features attaching the game to a service of theirs. More so I doubt much of the PC crowd would entertain the notion so easily.
As far as valve goes - they don't do any deals with any devs. At least that is what Steam has been doing all this time
You're kidding, right? Valve's done deals with devs in the early days of Steam, and they might still be doing some now, for all we know.
Edit: this is a bit off-topic. Apologies, folks.