What topic did I miss?bishoptl said:yeah, roughly 22 in the past day or so
What topic did I miss?bishoptl said:yeah, roughly 22 in the past day or so
bishoptl said:yeah, roughly 22 in the past day or so
So you want to say those games you listed above are more impressive visually than the first gen PS3 titles?Outdoor Miner said:So Mass Effect, Lost Planet, Lost Odyssey, Blue Dragon, GoW, Forza 2, and Eternal Sonata only look generally just as good (or in jasper's case, not even as good) as PS3's launch-window titles?
Not trying to defend the PR moron that made the original comments, just pointing out that your statements seems equally silly.
oh God help us all, the lists. Always with the lists!kia said:So you want to say those games you listed above are more impressive visually than the first gen PS3 titles?
Then you may go and check MotorStorm, Resistance, Heavenly Sword, Virtua Fighter 5, Ridge Racer 7, Devil May Cry 4, Metal Gear Solid 4, F1, ...
IMO first gen PS3 games (which will be released in the next 12 months) are at least as impressive as second gen X360 games graphics wise.
:lol :lolbishoptl said:oh God help us all, the lists. Always with the lists!
Somebody post the Silent Hill old man and put me out of my misery already.
SnakeXs said:
GhaleonEB said:Nothing he said was too out there. But laugh on guys!
Morbid Angel said:I will never, ever understand why people care about PR talk.
Ghost said:I suddenly understand all those dilbert cartoons.
He has a good point about PS3 numbers in March though, We (Europe) already managed to get screwed with crappy shipments for the PSP, there were so few units it barely registered as a launch, despite being several months late.
Lately? I could write a book with all the stupid ms comments there have been.K_S said:what is it with ms saying stuff that makes them sound retarded lately?
Roders5 said:Lately? I could write a book with all the stupid ms comments there have been.
segasonic said:on the other hand, he admits that 360 will eventually be overtaken by PS3...
Srider said:I should say this...
1. This statement admits that 360 graphics are subpar.
2. Does MS think PS3 graphics is not going to get even better in 2 to 3 years time?
3. So adding these two up means that 360 graphics will always be subpar compared to PS3.
Srider said:I should say this...
1. This statement admits that 360 graphics are subpar.
2. Does MS think PS3 graphics is not going to get even better in 2 to 3 years time?
3. So adding these two up means that 360 graphics will always be subpar compared to PS3.
TheOMan said:I'll be quite upset if Microsoft cuts this gen short again. As for this comment, yeah, it's stupid...but, uh, why do we care again?
C4Lukins said:I doubt they will cut it short. I think 4 and half years after launch they will announce the new system which will arrive 6 years after the 360 launch. Pretty reasonable. The reasons for cutting the XBOX's life short are many. Did they ever even make the system itself profitable? 5 to 6 years is perfect for me. The current gen systems have been pretty much treading water technically for the last year and a half. Sure you will get a RE4 or an Escape from Butcher Bay out of the batch, but when only two or three developers can actually still push your system, it is time for a change. The PS3 and 360 may have a seven to ten year lifespan, but we will be seeing the new thing well before that.
Jax said:
um. is that really what he wears in the game?
m0dus said:*white is coming pic*
m0dus said:
m0dus said:The issue wasn't one of it being successful. The issue is: everybody has ****ed up marketing. singling one company out for being "bad" is idiotic. They both do it right, and both do it wrong (see: MS Japan, HD, "Hi-Vision", etc)
m0dus said:http://digitalbattle.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/07/white-psp-europe.jpg
m0dus said:The issue is: everybody has ****ed up marketing.